|
Section 3. |
|
BRIDGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
3.1 |
Ref. |
Navigation and Bridge Organization |
Yes |
|
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
|||||||
|
3.1.15 |
|
Specialized charts relative to the trading area of the vessel are |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
|
|
|
available onboard and appropriately used in passage planning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
3.1.15 |
|
Specialized charts include Maritime Security Charts and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Passage Planning Charts. These charts are not normally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
incorporated into ECDIS; thus paper charts should be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
available onboard and in use. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
3.1.16 |
|
ECDIS is installed on-board the vessel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS |
SI |
||
|
|
|
If Yes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Res MSC.232 |
There is evidence that the ECDIS and the software is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
||
|
|
(82) |
approved by flag administration. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
3.1.17 |
ISM 6.3 |
Officers must have familiarization training for the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
||
|
|
STCW |
equipment installed on-board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
regulation I/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.17 |
|
If ECDIS is installed onboard, the officers must have |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
appropriate training, whether it is used as the primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
means of navigation or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
3.1.18 |
STCW |
Officers have attended a manufacturer type-specific |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R |
I |
||
|
|
regulation I/14 |
course or computer based training for the equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
installed on-board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.18 |
|
If the officers have attended a manufacture type-specific |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
course or computer based training for the equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
installed on-board, they have also met the requirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Coppola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for familiarization training, and both questions should be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
reported as "Yes". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.19 |
|
The company has a procedure addressing the use of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
||
|
|
|
ECDIS/ECS and the correction process for the system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
board system. |
|
Massimiliano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.19 |
ISM 7 |
The procedure/guidance/manual should include but is not limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
to following items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Guidance on benefits and limitations of ECDIS/ECS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
- Guidance on what vector system means and what layering of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
information is and when and why to switch on and off certain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
layers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Guidance on official and unofficial chart data for use on the on- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Clear policy regarding Company training requirement on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECDIS, and minimum acceptable parameters on alarm settings for use with ECDIS/ECS. (Example safety contour safety depth, shallow contour, deep contour etc.).
- The familiarisation check list listing critical parameters to be assessed for newly appointed deck officers.
- Correctionsguidance on T&Ps management.
- Information on what mode is ECDIS/ECS use approved and does vessel flag state allow use of RCDS (Raster Chart Display System) and under what conditions.
3.1.20
3.1.20ISM 7
3.1.21STCW 2010 A - VIII/2 22.1
The company has a clear policy regarding minimum |
S |
I |
acceptable parameters on alarm settings and layers for |
|
|
use with ECDIS/ECS. |
|
|
- Examples include safety contour safety depth, shallow |
|
|
contour, deep contour etc.. |
|
|
The Master has established standing orders in alignment |
S |
I |
with the above, and they are being complied with. |
|
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 41 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 3. |
|
BRIDGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
Ref. |
Navigation and Bridge Organization |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
|
3.1.22 |
Form E |
ECDIS is not the primary means of navigation |
|
|
|
NS SI |
|
|
attached to Safety Equipment Certificate
3.1.22
3.1.23
3.1.24
3.1.25
3.1.26BPG
3.1.27Res MSC 232(82)
3.1.28
3.1.29STCW 2010 A-VIII/2.5
3.1.30
3.1.30BPG
3.1.31
3.1.31STCW Section A VIII/2 Part 2
If Yes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any ECDIS or ECS on the bridge is available for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
navigation support, and should thus be considered as a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
means of navigation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It should never be reported as 'for training purpose' or for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'reference only'. All charts for such equipment should also |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be kept updated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The vessel must have paper charts onboard as the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
primary system of navigation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridge watchkeeping officers are aware that the ECDIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
R |
I |
|
and/or ECS cannot be used as the primary means for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
navigation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ECDIS charts must be the official approved charts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The full passage must be planned in the ECDIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
The full passage plan must be available in the ECDIS utilizing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
all necessary charts of the appropriate scale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
The ENC license are valid for all passage charts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A procedure that is based upon a risk assessment that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
provides for continued safe navigation (even if only to reach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The frequency of position fixing should beCoppolasuch that the vessel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
safe waters) in the event of complete ECDIS failure is available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
onboard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriate intervals of position fixing are clearly defined within |
|
|
|
|
|
|
R |
I |
|
the passage plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massimiliano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cannot run into danger during the interval between the fixes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maximum position fixing interval should be defined in the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
passage plan. Where the navigational circumstances may |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
change on a particular leg, i.e. proximity to obstructions or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shoals, then the position fixing interval should be amended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accordingly. For new build only, N/A may be used. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navigation warnings and T&P notices are taken into account in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
passage planning and duringby |
the voyage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
navigationalPurchasedwarnings are being included in the electronic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
There must be evidence that navigation warnings are made |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use of with details being noted on the relevant charts. There |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
must be a system in place for the filing and updating of all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
navigation warnings. |
Where ECDIS is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used, there must be evidence that T&P notices and charts.
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 42 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 3. |
|
BRIDGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
Ref. |
Navigation and Bridge Organization |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
3.1.32
3.1.32STCW Section A VIII/1 Part 4- 1 Sub Section 25
3.1.33
3.1.33STCW Section A VIII/1 Part 4- 1 Sub Section 51
STCW 7/Circ 14
3.1.34
3.1.34STCW: BridgeTeam manage - ment
3.1.35
3.1.35STCW Section A VIII/1 Part 4- 1 Sub Section 47
The position is fixed at sufficiently frequent intervals to ensure that the ship follows the planned course
The frequency of position fixing must be such that the vessel cannot run into danger during the interval between the fixes. The frequency of position fixing must be in compliance with the passage plan, and must ensure that the ship’s position is effectively monitored in relation to the proximity of navigation hazards when the speed and draft of the ship are taken into
account.
While at anchor, the position of the vessel must be monitored and recorded at sufficiently frequent intervals
The frequency of monitoring and recording the position must be such that the vessel cannot be put in danger during the interval between the fixes and must ensure that the ship’s position is effectively monitored and recorded, by means such as bearing and distance or visual bearings.
More than one method of fixing position was used during deep sea passages
There must be evidence that at least two independent methods are used for fixing the ship’s position when in open sea. The evidence should consist of plotted positions on the chart together with identification of the position fixing system/method used (log book or work book entries). Where the vessel carries only one electronic position fixing aid suitable for deep sea navigation then evidence should be produced to show that celestial observations are carried out.
Where ECDIS is used as a primary means of navigation, efficient and effective cross-checking of positions should be implemented.
If celestial observations are not possible due to weather, this |
|
|
Coppola |
should be verified through entries in the log book and recorded |
|
as an observation. |
Massimiliano |
waters |
|
More than one method of fixing position was used in coastal
|
by |
There must be evidence that at least two independent |
|
Purchased |
|
methods are used for fixing the ship’s position in coastal waters.
Where ECDIS is used as a primary means of navigation, efficient and effective cross-checking of positions should be implemented. The watchkeeping officer should demonstrate the reporting of a radar position on the ECDIS; overlaying the radar screen on the ENC is not equivalent.
SI
SI
SI
SI
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 43 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 3. |
|
BRIDGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
Ref. |
Navigation and Bridge Organization |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
3.1.36 |
|
The watch officer has unrestricted access to navigation |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
systems |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.37 |
|
The watch officer has unrestricted access to communication |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
systems |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.38 |
|
The watch officer has unrestricted access to use of the engines |
|
|
|
S |
I |
3.1.36-38 SSTCW Section A
VIII/1 Part 4-1 Sub Sect 29TCW A-VIII/2 3-1.29
This should be stated in the Company Bridge Procedures or Master’s orders.
3.1.39
3.1.39STCW A-VIII/2 3-1.36, BPG 4.8
3.1.40
3.1.40SOLAS IV Reg 7 1.4
3.1.41
3.1.41SOLAS IV Reg 7 1.4
3.1.42
3.1.42MSC.1 Circ.1288/ Rev 1
The depth finder is operated when making a landfall and in coastal waters
To assess this question an examination should be made of the echo sounder recorder paper, the log book, or an electronic history log to ascertain when the depth finder was operated. In the absence of any objective evidence of operation, the question should be answered "No".
The Navtex is operating on the appropriate station(s) for the ship's location
The Navtex operating status should be examined to establish which stations are selected for current reception. The station
Navtex coverage, this question should beCoppolaanswered as a Yes, and a note entered in the remark section to this effect.
for the ships location must be included on this list.
Where the vessel is operating in an area where there is no
The Navtex is programmed to receive navigation warnings and weather forecasts
Recent Navtex printouts should be examined for navigational warnings and weather forecasts. In the absence of any
printouts the Navtex operating status should be examined to
Massimiliano
establish that the Navtex is programmed for the reception of |
|
navigational warnings and weather forecasts. |
|
Purchased |
by |
Where the vessel is operating in an area where there is no
Navtex coverage, this question should be answered as a Yes, and a note entered in the remark section to this effect.
Navtex navigation warnings are correctly managed and filed
In-force navigational warnings should be retained on-board for as long as the vessel remains within a particular area. All navigating officers must be able to demonstrate familiarity and operation of the system and management of the warnings.
RI
SI
SI
SI
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 44 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 3. |
|
BRIDGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
Ref. |
Navigation and Bridge Organization |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
|
3.1.43 |
|
There is evidence that the ship receives maritime weather |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
|
forecasts appropriate for the vessel and trading area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.43 |
Res A 528 |
There must be evidence of receipt of weather routing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13) |
information, weather faxes, or other weather information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retained on-board. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.44 |
|
Master / pilot information exchange procedures are in use |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
3.1.44 |
BPG A3. IMO |
The procedure should be identified within the Company Bridge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
res. A.601 (15) |
Procedures. There must be evidence of a formal Master / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pilot information exchange, including providing information in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
advance. This will normally take the form of a pilot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
information exchange card. Evidence should be found that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the system is used, i.e. copies of used exchange cards or log |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entries when the procedure has been completed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.45 |
|
Ship maintains full navigation procedures when the pilot is on- |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.45STCW Section The answer to this question will be determined with reference
A VIII/1 Part 4- to the bridge movement book and port entry charts.
1 Sub Sect
49,50
Exchange procedures for the Master to assume control from the duty officer are clearly defined and recorded
This procedure must be stated in the Company Bridge Procedures or as part of the Master’s orders
A magnetic compass deviation card / table is available on the |
|
bridge |
Coppola |
|
|
Magnetic and gyro compasses are compared at least each watch
This should be established from the log entries made by each Officer of the Watch.
Massimiliano
|
by |
Magnetic compass error is determined at least once per watch |
|
and, when possible, after any major alteration of course |
|
Purchased |
|
This refers to magnetic compass observations and not comparisons with the gyro. This should be established from entries in a compass error book or other suitable record. This record of compass errors should be complete and up to date. The observed error should not significantly differ from what is recorded on the deviation card. Due allowance must be made for the occasions on which a compass error cannot be ascertained (visibility, weather, traffic density), and should be verified through cross-checking of the deck log book or compass log book.
SI
SI
SI
SI
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 45 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |