Section 11. |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
Ref. |
Crew Knowledge and Proficiency |
|
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
||
|
|
The Inspector will interview various members of the crew to |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
seek evidence of knowledge and proficiency. The purpose of |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
the interview is to ensure that personnel can demonstrate |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
sufficient depth of knowledge and familiarity with the policies, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
procedures, and equipment on board, as laid down in their job |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
description. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.1 |
STCW 95 |
Personnel are familiar with their SOPEP/SMPEP and/or VRP |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
A-I/14 2.1.2 |
duties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.2 |
|
Officers are familiar with procedures for the disposal of tank |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
|
washing/ballast containing category X, Y, Z and OS residues |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
11.2.3 |
|
Officers are familiar with the discharge limitations in Special |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
|
Areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.4 |
|
Officers are familiar with the procedures for tank pre-wash |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
|
requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.5 |
|
Responsible personnel are familiar with the use of the stripping |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
|
system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.2-5 |
STCW 95 A- |
Responsible Officers (i.e. those responsible for a particular |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
I/14 2.1.2 |
requirement) should have detailed understanding of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
regulations and requirements. Other officers should have an |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
awareness of the limitations and requirements of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
regulations and company policies and procedures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
11.2.6 |
MARPOL V |
Personnel are aware of requirements for the collection and |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
Reg 9.2 |
disposal of garbage |
|
|
Coppola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.7 |
|
Personnel are familiar with other aspects of Environmental |
|
|
|
R |
I |
|||
|
|
Protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.7 |
|
Personnel should have a basic understanding of the limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
of the disposal of residues overboard. This question is also |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Massimiliano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
intended to cover any other area questioned by the inspector |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
not covered by the questions in this chapter. If answered No, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
the inspector should note the issues identified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Purchased |
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 136 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 12. |
|
SECURITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
Ref |
Security |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
12.1 |
ISPS Code |
There is a designated Ship Security Officer (SSO) on board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
12.2 |
Part A Sec 12 |
Is the SSO aware of his responsibilities as defined in the code. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2ISPS Part 12.2
12.3ISPS
12.4
12.4ISPS
12.5
12.6ISPS BMP
12.7ISPS
12.8
12.8ISPS
Responsibilities of the SSO, as defined in the ISPS Code, shall include but are not limited to:
- Undertaking regular security inspections of the ship to ensure that appropriate security measures are maintained;
- Maintaining and supervising the implementation of the Ship Security Plan (SSP), monitoring the continuing relevance and effectiveness of the Plan, including the undertaking of internal audits and any amendments to the Plan;
- Co-ordinating the security aspects of the handling of cargo and ship’s stores with other shipboard personnel and with the relevant Port Facility Security Officers (PFSO);
- Proposing modifications to the SSP;
- Reporting to the Company Security Officer (CSO) any deficiencies and non-conformities identified during internal audits, periodic reviews, security inspections and verifications of compliance, and implementing any corrective actions;
shipboard personnel, as appropriate; - Reporting all security incidents;
- Enhancing security awareness and vigilanceCoppolaon board; - Ensuring that adequate training has been provided to
- Co-ordinating implementation of the SSP with the CSO and the relevant PFSO;
- Ensuring that any security equipment is properly operated, tested, calibrated and maintained.
Officers and crew are aware of the security level on-board and the meaning of the security level
Massimiliano
A watch is maintained to prevent persons gaining unauthorized access to the ship by
from ashore is controlled.
This should be assessed on Inspector's own experience when boarding shipPurchasedand by observation during the inspection. There must be evidence that boarding of the ship by persons
Personnel assigned for access watch are not involved with cargo operations or other activities that may distract them from security responsibilities
Personnel are aware of steps to be taken to prevent unauthorized access to the vessel in port and at sea
There is a system in place to check visitors against recognised identification documents
A Visitors log is being maintained
The Visitors log should contain time in, name or signature of the visitor and time out.
SSI
SSI
SI
SI
RI
SI
SI
SI
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 137 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 12. |
|
SECURITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
Ref |
Security |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
12.9
12.9ISPS Code Part A 10.1
STCW 2010
Shipboard security training has been carried out for all |
S I |
personnel relevant to their duties on-board |
|
From 1-Jan-2014 under revisions to STCW 2010, mandatory |
|
training is required for all crew, as appropriate. |
|
12.10ISPS SOLAS XI-2 Reg 8.2
12.11
MSC-FAL.1/
Circ.3
GCSOS
(Version 2)
12.12MSC-FAL.1/ Circ.3
GCSOS (Version 2)
Security actions taken on-board are done in a way so as to not |
S |
I |
compromise safety |
|
|
The company provides guidance on cybersecurity |
R |
I |
The guidance may be incorporated in the SMS, and should |
|
|
include: |
|
|
- Identification of threats |
|
|
- Identification of vulnerabilities |
|
|
- A risk assessment completed by the company |
|
|
- Protection and protective measures |
|
|
- Contingency plans |
|
|
- Response and recovery from cybersecurity incidents |
|
|
The crew has been trained in company guidelines, policies or |
R |
I |
procedures on cybersecurity |
|
|
12.12 |
There should be evidence that training has been completed. |
||
|
The crew should be aware of threats/vulnerabilities, such as |
||
|
the use of USB sticks, private electronic equipment, and the |
||
|
need for viligence. Personnel should also be aware of and in |
||
|
compliance with any limitations on the use and/or location of |
||
|
use of equipment, and the actions to take if they identify a |
||
|
potential threat to onboard or private equipment.Coppola |
||
|
|
by |
Massimiliano |
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 138 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 13. |
|
HULL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
Ref |
Hull and Superstructure |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
|
|
The appearance and maintenance condition of the following |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appears satisfactory: |
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
Hull |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
13.2 |
Hull markings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
13.3 |
Deck areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
13.4 |
Cargo and manifold area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
13.5 |
Superstructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
13.6 |
Funnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
13.7 |
Weathertight doors, ports and hatches |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
|
|
|||||||||
13.8 |
Ballast tank and void space vents and marking |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
13.9 |
Ventilation and fire flaps and marking |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
13.10 |
Sea chest and overboard valves and other penetrations, |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
|
including service marking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.11 |
Catwalks, walkways, handrails, stairways |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
13.1-11 |
In assessing the appearance and condition of the hull and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
superstructure the age of the ship should be taken into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
consideration. However the following should not be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
considered satisfactory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Large areas of contact damage on hull from tugs or jetties. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Damage to fore part due to heavy weather. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Areas of paint work on boot topping or top sides damaged. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Areas of hull and decks showing signs of excessive rusting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Areas of hull showing excessive marine growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Areas of accommodation and funnel showing signs of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
rusting. |
|
Coppola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- General appearance of paint work poor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Outside accommodation decks showing signs of poor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
maintenance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Hull markings such as draught marks, bulbous bow warnings, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
bow thruster warnings, tug push points etc. not clearly marked. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Watertight doors, ports and hatches with rubber seals in poor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
condition or missing, securingMassimilianoarrangements damaged or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
missing. |
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Ballast tank and void space vents damaged or corroded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Ventilation and fire flaps, seized, damaged or lashed open. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Inspectors are encouraged to provide a general comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
regarding the overall impression of the appearance and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
condition of the vessel. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 139 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 14. |
|
ACCOMMODATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. |
Ref |
Accommodation |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
|
|
The appearance and housekeeping standard of the following |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(when fitted) meets applicable regulations and appears |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
satisfactory: |
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
ILO |
Bridge |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
ILO |
Communications room |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
ILO |
Accommodations |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
ILO |
Sanitary facilities |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.5 |
ILO |
Mess Rooms |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.6 |
ILO |
Lounges |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.7 |
ILO |
Galley |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
ILO |
Pantries |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.9 |
ILO |
Dry stores |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.10 |
ILO |
Refrigerated stores |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.11 |
ILO |
Laundry / drying room |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.12 |
ILO |
Cargo control rooms |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.13 |
ILO |
Offices |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.14 |
ILO |
Self-closing doors/fire doors inside the accomodation |
D |
I |
|
|
MLC |
The following should be recorded as observationsCoppola and |
|
|
|
14.1 - 14 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
discussed with the Master: |
|
|
|
|
|
- Decks in poor state of repair. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Decks showing a general lack of cleaning. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Toilet areas dirty or with fittings broken or missing. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Accommodation lighting poor or not operational. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Furniture and fittings broken or in a poor state of repair. |
|
|
|
|
|
Massimiliano |
|
|
|
|
|
- Poor hygiene standards in galley area. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Stores not tidy. Evidenceby |
of rotting food. Fridge |
|
|
|
|
operating temperatures too high (per the WHO Handbook |
|
|
|
|
|
for Inspection of Ships and Issuance of Ship Sanitation |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates Ch 14.10, frozen food to be maintained at or |
|
|
|
|
|
below -18°C and storage at or below +4 °C). Fridge lights |
|
|
|
|
|
and alarms not working. |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
- Public alleyways used as drying rooms. - Public spaces untidy or used for storage. - Incorrect use of storage spaces.
Inspectors are encouraged to provide a general comment regarding the overall impression of the appearance and condition of accommodation and internal spaces.
|
|
- No unauthorized holdback arrangements on fire doors |
|
|
|
- Self-closing devices on doors not properly operating |
|
|
|
and/or doors not sealing |
|
|
|
Inspectors are encouraged to provide a general comment |
|
|
|
regarding the overall impression of the appearance and |
|
|
|
condition of accommodation and internal spaces. |
|
14.15 |
ILO |
There is a system on-board for the regular inspection of |
D I |
|
MLC |
accommodation, storage and work spaces, including |
|
|
|
|
documentation of the inspection
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas
Rev. CDI 8/19