Denying death: An interdisciplinary approach to terror management theory / Ed. by Lindsey Harvell, Gwendelyn S. Nisbett. N.Y.: Routledge, 2016.
Doherty K.L., Webler T.N. Social norms and efficacy beliefs drive the Alarmed segment's public-sphere climate actions // Nature Climate Change. 2016. № 6. Pp. 879-884. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3025.
Doty R.M., Peterson B.E., Winter D.G. Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987 // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991. № 61. Pp. 629.
Dunning A., Pownall M. Dispositional and situational attribution of COVID-19 risk: A content analysis of response typology // Psyarchiv. 2020. 7 April. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/czskd (дата обращения 11.04.2020).
Garfin D.R., Silver R.C., Holman E.A. The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure // Health Psychology. 2020. № 39(5). Pp. 355-357.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000875.
Granovetter M.S. The Strength of Weak Ties // The American Journal of Sociology. 1973. 78 (6). Pp. 1360-1380. doi:10.1086/225469.
Greenberg J. Understanding the Vital Human Quest for Self-Esteem // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008. V. 3. № 1. P. 48-55.
Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T., Solomon Sh. The causes and consequences of the need for self-esteem: A terror management theory // Public and private self. Ed. by R.F. Baumeister. N.Y.: Springer-Verlag, 1986. P. 189-212.
Harper C. A., Satchell L., Fido D., Latzman R. Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic // Psyarchiv. 2020. 1 April. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jkfu3 (дата доступа 5.04.2020).
Hirsch A. If coronavirus doesn't discriminate, how come black people are bearing the brunt? // Guardian. 8 April 2020. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/08/coronavirus-black- people-ethnic-minority-deaths-pandemic-inequality-afua-hirsch (дата доступа
11.04.2020) .
Hogg M.A., van Knippenberg D. Social identity and leadership processes in groups // Advances in experimental social psychology. V. 35. Pp. 1-52. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01001-3.
Hong S., Collins A. Societal responses to familiar versus unfamiliar risk: Comparisons of influenza and SARS in Korea // Risk Analysis. 2006. 26. Pp. 1247-1257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00812.x.
Karwowski M., Kowal M., Groyecka A., Bialek M., Lebuda I., Sorokowska A., Sorokowski P. When in Danger, Turn Right: Covid-19 Threat Promotes Social Conservatism and Right-Wing Presidential Candidates // Psyarchiv. 2020. 31 March. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pjfhs (дата доступа 5.04.2020).
Kerr N.L., Tindale R.S. Group performance and decision making // Annual Review of Psychology. 2004. V. 55. P. 623-655.
King D., Kamble Sh., DeLongis A. Coping with influenza A/H1N1 in India: empathy is associated with increased vaccination and health precautions // International Journal of Health Promotion and Education. 2016. Pp. 1-12. 10.1080/14635240.2016.1174950.
Kivikangas J.M., Lцnnqvist J.-E., Ravaja N. Relationship of moral foundations to political liberalism-conservatism and left-right orientation in a Finnish representative sample // Social Psychology. 2017. V. 48 (4). P. 246-251.
Kusano K., Kemmelmeier M. Multi-level modelling of time-series cross-sectional data reveals the dynamic interaction between ecological threats and democratic development // Royal Society Open Science. 2020. V. 7. № 3: 7191804. URL: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.191804 (дата доступа 20.04.2020) .
Li J., Yang A., Dou K., Wang L., Zhang M., Lin X. Chinese public's knowledge, perceived severity, and perceived controllability of the COVID-19 and their associations with emotional and behavioural reactions, social participation, and precautionary behaviour: A national survey // Psyarchiv. 2020. 28 February. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5tmsh (дата доступа 5.04.2020).
Lieder F., Griffiths T.L., Hsu M. Overrepresentation of extreme events in decision making reflects rational use of cognitive resources // Psychological review. 2018. 125(1): 1-32. doi: 10.1037/rev0000074. Epub 2017 Oct 16 (дата доступа 5.04.2020) .
McCann S.J.H. Threatening times, «strong» presidential popular vote winners, and the victory margin, 1824-1964 // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997. 73(1). Pp. 160-170.
McDonnell, W.M., Nelson, D.S., Schunk, J.E. Should we fear “flu fear” itself? Effects of H1N1 influenza fear on ED use // The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2012. 30. Pp. 275282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2010.11.027.
Moser D.A., Glaus J., Frangou S., Schechter D.S. Years of life lost due to the psychosocial consequences of COVID19 mitigation strategies based on Swiss data // medRxiv 2020.04.17.20069716; doi:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.20069716 (дата доступа 20.04.2020).
Nelson W., Osman M. Sociological and psychological insights behind predicted changes as a result of COVID-19 // Psyarchiv. 2020. 5 April. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/s5jkh (дата обращения 10.04.2020).
Ng Y.J., Yang Z.J., Vishwanath A. To fear or not to fear? Applying the social amplification of risk framework on two environmental health risks in Singapore // Journal of Risk Research. 2018. 21. Pp. 1487-1501. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1313762.
Okruszek L., Aniszewska-Stahczuk A., Piejka A., Wisniewska M., Zurek K. Safe but lonely? Loneliness, mental health symptoms and COVID-19 // Psyarchiv.
2020. 10 April. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9njps (retrieved: 11.04.2020).
Pfattheicher S., Nockur L., Bцhm R., Sassenrath C., Petersen M. The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic // Psyarchiv. 2020. 23 March. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y2cg5 (дата доступа 6.04.2020).
Plohl N., Musil B. Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: The critical role of trust in science // Psyarchiv. 2020. 6 April.
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6a2cx (дата доступа 10.04.2020).
Rainie L., Perrin A. The state of Americans' trust in each other amid the COVID-19 pandemic // Pew Research Center. 2020. APRIL 6. URL:
https://pewrsr.ch/34ly9B9 (дата доступа 10.04.2020).
Rhee S.-E. Group emotions and group outcomes: the role of group-member interactions // Affect and Groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams. Ed. by E.A. Mannix, M.A. Neale, C.P. Anderson. V. 10. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd., 2007. P. 65-95.
Rime B., Paez D., Basabe N., Martinez F. Social sharing of emotion, post-traumatic growth, and emotional climate: Follow-up of Spanish citizen's response to the collective trauma of March 11th terrorist attacks in Madrid // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2010. V. 40. P. 1029-1045.
Russo S., Mirisola A., Roccato M. Facing natural disasters through the endorsement of authoritarian attitudes // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2020. Vol. 68: 101412 https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvp.2020.101412 (дата доступа 10.04.2020) .
Schultz P.W., Nolan J.M., Cialdini R.B., Goldstein N.J., Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms // Psychological Science. 2007. 18(5). Pp. 429-434. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2007.01917.x
Schumacher J.A., Coffey S.F., Norris F.H., Tracy M., Clements K., Galea S. Intimate partner violence and Hurricane Katrina: predictors and associated mental health outcomes // Violence Vict. 2010. 25(5). Pp. 588-603.
Snowden F.M. Epidemics and Society: From the Black Death to the Present. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2019.
Solomon S., Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T. A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self- esteem and cultural worldviews // Advances in Experimental Social psychology. 1991. V. 24 (C). P. 93-159. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60328-7.
Stark L., Ager A. A systematic review of prevalence studies of gender-based violence in complex emergencies // Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011.12(3). Pp. 127-134.
Sullivan D., Landau M.J., Rothschild Z.K. An existential function of enemyship: evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010. V. 98(3). P. 434-449. doi: 10.1037/a0017457.
The Governance for Happiness. Global Survey results. Conducted by George Ward & Schoen Consulting, October 2019. URL: https://yes-
ukraine.org/files/pdf/Happiness_report_2019.pdf (дата доступа 10.04.2020).
Thomson R., Yuki M., Talhelm T., Schug J., Kito M., Ayanian A.H., Becker J.C., et al. Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). 2018. 115 (29). Pp. 7521-7526. DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1713191115.
UNICEF. Social isolation and COVID-19. UNICEF, 2020. URL:
https://www.unicef.by/uploads/models/2020/03/covid19_stigma_guide_rus.pdf (дата доступа 10.04.2020).
Van Zomeren M., Spears R., Leach C.W. Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: Does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage? // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2008. V. 47. P. 353-372.
Vosoughi S., Roy D., Aral S. The spread of true and false news online // Science. 2018. V. 359. № 6380. Pp. 1146-1151.
Wang Y., McKee M., Torbica A., Stuckler D. Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-relaated Misinformation on Social Media // Social Science & Medicine. 2019. V. 240: 112552. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31561111/ (дата доступа 5.04.2020).
WHO. Building back better: sustainable mental health care after emergencies. WHO: Geneva, 2013.
Willer R. The effects of government-issued terror warnings on presidential approval ratings // Current Research in Social Psychology. 2004. 10. Pp. 1-12.
Yu S., Liu X. Strain of life under lockdown sparks divorce surge in China // Financial Times. 2020. APRIL 4. URL: https://www.ft.com/content/11990ff0-c8f5-4f60- 9b0a-be06324a4ddb (дата доступа 5.04.2020).