24. Budberg, A.P. (1932) Sibirskie vospominaniya (1895-1904) [Siberian Memories (1895-1904)]. Vestnik Obshchestva russkikh veteranov Ve- likoy voyny. 68-69. From the funds of the Museum of Russian Culture in San Francisco.
25. Budberg, A.P. (2017) Sibirskie vospominaniya [Siberian memories]. Vladivostok: Obshchestvo izucheniya Amurskogo kraya - Primorskoe kraevoe otdelenie Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva.
26. Sukhomlinov, V.A. (2005) Vospominaniya. Memuary [Memories. Memoirs]. Minsk: Kharvest.
27. Voennaya tipografiya. (1888) Nastavlenie dlya mobilizatsii chastey deystvuyushchey i rezervnoy pekhoty. Svod ukazaniy i soobrazheniy po ispolneniyu mobilizatsionnykh rabot v chastyakh deystvuyushchey i rezervnoy pekhoty. Ispr. po 1 yanvarya 1888 g. [Manual for the mobilization of parts of the existing and reserve infantry. A set of instructions and considerations for the execution of mobilization work in divisions of the current and reserve infantry]. St. Petersburg: Voennaya tipografiya.
28. Vasilevskiy. (1910) Rukovodstvo dlya shtab-ofitserov i kapitanov, podvergayushchikhsya ispytaniyu pri zachislenii v kandidaty na dolzhnosti uezdnykh voinskikh nachal'nikov i spravochnaya kniga dlya uezdnykh voinskikh nachal'nikov. Ispr. i dop. (po 1 fevralya 1910g.) N. Khodorovich [A guide for headquarters officers and captains who are subject to probation when enrolling as candidates for the posts of district military commanders and a reference book for district military commanders. Correct and supplemented (as of February 1, 1910) by N. Khodorovich]. 7th ed. St. Petersburg: Izd. V. Berezovskogo.
29. Novitskiy, V.F. et al. (eds) (1914) Voennaya entsiklopediya [Military Encyclopedia]. Vol. 16. St. Petersburg: T-vo I.D. Sytina.
30. Anon. (1896) Prikaz voyskam Priamurskogo voennogo okruga № 368 ot 31 oktyabrya 1896 g. i prilozhennyy k nemu Svod glavneyshikh za- mechaniy iz otchetov komissiy, nablyudavshikh za proizvodstvom poverochnykh mobilizatsiy v 1896 g. [Order to the troops of the Pri-Amur Military District No. 368 of October 31, 1896, and the summary of the most important remarks from reports of the committees that monitored the mobilizations in 1896 attached to it]. In: Prikazy voyskam Priamurskogo voennogo okruga za 1898 g. [Orders to the Pri-Amur Military District for 1898]. Khabarovsk: [s.n.].
31. Budberg, A.P. (1931) Sibirskie vospominaniya (1895-1904) [Siberian Memories (1895-1904)]. Vestnik Obshchestva russkikh veteranov Ve- likoy voyny. 59-60. From the funds of the Museum of Russian Culture in San Francisco.
32. Avilov, R.S. (2016) The “test mobilizations” of troops in Priamurskiy Military District in 1896 as a way to appreciate the mobilization readiness of military forces. Oykumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya -- Ojkumena. Regional Researches. 1. (In Russian).
33. Anon. (1898) Prikaz voyskam Priamurskogo voennogo okruga № 221 ot 22 iyunya 1898 g. i prilozhennyy k nemu Svod glavneyshikh za- mechaniy po poverochnoy mobilizatsii nekotorykh chastey voysk i upravleniy Priamurskogo voennogo okruga v 1897 g. [Order to the troops of the Pri-Amur Military District No. 221 of June 22, 1898, and the remarks attached to it on the calibration mobilization of some parts of the troops and directorates of the Pri-Amur Military District in 1897]. In: Prikazy voyskam Priamurskogo voennogo okruga za 1898 g. [Orders to the Pri-Amur Military District for 1898]. Khabarovsk: [s.n.].
34. Anon. (1898) Prikaz voyskam Priamurskogo voennogo okruga № 245 ot 12 iyulya 1898 g. [Order to the troops of the Pri-Amur Military District No. 245 of July 12, 1898]. In: Prikazy voyskam Priamurskogo voennogo okruga za 1898 g. [Orders to the Pri-Amur Military District for 1898]. Khabarovsk: [s.n.].
35. Anon. (1900) Prikazanie voyskam Priamurskogo voennogo okruga № 29 ot 10 fevralya 1900 g. i prilozhennye k nemu Zamechaniya Koman- duyushchego voyskami Priamurskogo voennogo okruga, sdelannye vo vremya proizvodstva probnoy mobilizatsii, zimoyu 1899 g. [Order to the troops of the Pri-Amur Military District No. 29 dated February 10, 1900 and the comments of the Commander of the Pri-Amur Military District attached to it made during the test mobilization in winter 1899]. In: Prikazaniya voyskam Priamurskogo voennogo okruga za 1900 g. [Orders to the Pri- Amur Military District for 1900]. Khabarovsk: [s.n.].
36. Kalyuzhnaya, N.M. (1978) Vosstanie Ikhetuaney (1898-1901 gg.) [Yihetuan Movement (1898-1901)]. Moscow: Nauka.
37. Alekseev, M. (1998) Voennaya razvedka Rossii ot Ryurika do Nikolaya II [Military intelligence of Russia from Rurik to Nicholas I]. Book 1. Moscow: Izdatel'skiy dom “Russkaya razvedka”; IIA “Evraziya+”.
38. Dobychina, E.V. (2003) Vneshnyaya razvedka Rossii na Dal'nem Vostoke 1895-1904 gg. [Russian Foreign Intelligence in the Far East 18951904]. History Cand. Diss. Moscow.
Abstract
The Problem of the Military Defense Planning of the Russian Far East in 1896-1900. Part 2. The Eve of the Chinese Campaign of 1900-1901
Roman S. Avilov, Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography of the Peoples of the Far East of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Vladivostok, Russian Federation); Research Library of the Far Eastern Federal University (Vladivostok, Russian Federation).
Using the unknown sources from the State Archive of the Russian Federation, the Russian State Military Historical Archive and the Collection of Manuscripts of the Russian State Library, this article examines the history of creating the military defense plans of the Russian Far East in 1896-1900 and the discussions about this issue. The controversy between the commanders of the Pri-Amur Military District, the chief of the Main Staff of the War Ministry and War Minister Aleksey N. Kuropatkin himself was also investigated. The creation of the new defense plan of the Russian Far East and the plan of force concentration in case of an outbreak of hostilities in this region, as well as the elaboration of a new mobilization schedule were also studied. It was revealed that the commander of the forces of the Pri-Amur Military District, General Nikolay I. Grodekov, reported to the war minister about the Japanese menace back in 1899, and this information was reported to Russian Emperor Nicholas II. Moreover, it was found that after 1895 the commanders of the Pri-Amur Military District were absolutely sure in the inevitability of the war with the Empire of Japan (probably in alliance with the British Empire), so all war plans and plans of force concentration in this region were created according to this menace.
Because of it, by the start of the China Campaign of 1900-01 there were no plans of war only with China in the Russian Empire. The Military District Staff only had an old plan of force concentration, which had been prepared in the spring of 1895, a few months before the real mobilization of the Pri-Amur Military District. In fact, it was the plan used by the Russian Army in the first period of the China Campaign of 1900-01. The situation with the regional military planning in the new campaign was also complicated due to permanent changes in benchmark data. First, it was decided to build the Eastern Chinese Railway, which was strategically important to the Russian Army, in China. That raised the question of how to defend it in case of war. The Kwantung Territory with Port Arthur was occupied for 25 years, and there was a great problem of how to defend it too without enough troops in the region. A better situation was with the mobilization schedule. The renovated version of this document (Mobilization Schedule of the Pri-Amur Military District No 5) was finished and put in force on April 15, 1900, two months before the real mobilization of this military district. Another positive factor was the experience of a real mobilization of 1895, and the regular test mobilizations of separate troops, forces and military institutions, which took place in the Russian Far East in 1896-99.
Keywords: Russian Far East; Pri-Amur Military District; Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895; China Campaign of 1900-1901; Vladivostok Fortress; Nikolay I. Grodekov; Aleksey N. Kuropatkin; mobilization readiness.