СавиныхНП, Мальцева ТА 2008. Модуль у растений как структура и категория. Вест. Тверск. гос. ун-та. Сер. «Биологияи экология». Вып. 9. С. 227-233.
Савиных НП, Черемушкина ВА 2015. Биоморфология: современное состояние и перспективы. Сибирский экологический журн. Т. 22, № 5. С. 659-670. https://doi.org/10.15372/ SEJ20150501.
Серебряков И. Г. 1962. Экологическая морфология растений. М.: Высш. школа. 380 с.
Смирнова О.В, Бобровский М.В. 2004. Дуб-кочевник. Природа. № 12. С. 26-30.
Стаменов М.Н. 2016. Структурно-функциональное разнообразие и количественные признаки двухлетних побеговых систем у прегенеративных особей Quercus robur L. (Fagaceae) в различных условиях освещения в центре Европейской России. Вест. СПбГУ. Сер. 3. Биология. Вып. 1. С. 49-61.
Шаровкина ММ, Антонова И. С. 2011. Некоторые особенности строения кроны молодых генеративных деревьев Tiliaplatyphyllos Scop. в разных экологических условиях. Весник СПбГУ. Сер. 3. Биология. Вып. 3. С. 26-36.
Царев АП, Погиба СП, Тренин В.В.2003. Селекция и репродукция лесных древесных пород: Учебник. М.: Логос. 520 с.
Шитт ПГ 1952. Биологические основы агротехники плодоводства. М.: Гос. изд-во сельскохоз. литературы. 360 с.
BarthйlemyD, Caraglio Y. 2007. Plant architecture: a dy- 113. (In Russ.).
Grudzlnskaya IA 1960. Summer shoot formation in trees and its classification. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 43 (7): 968-978. (In Russ.).
Hallйj F, Oldeman RA, Tomlinson P.B. 1978. Tropical trees and architectural analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag. 445 p.
Ivanova AV, Mazurenko M.T. 2013. Variants of realization of ontogenetic trajectories of Quercus robur (Fagaceae) in Samara region. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 98 (8): 1014-1030. (In Russ.).
Kaplina N.F, SelochnikNN2009. Morphology of crowns and Quercus robur state in middle-aged forest-steppe plantations. Russian journal of forest science 3: 33-42. (In Russ.).
Kawamura K2010. A conceptual framework for the study of modular responses to local environmental heterogeneity within the plant crown and a review of related concepts. Ecological Research 25: 733-744.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-009-0688-0.
Kazakova NL, Antonova IS. 2015. The crown shape of Araucaria araucana (Molina) K Koch under the different age stages and ecological conditions in natural habitats. Herald of TVGU. Series: Biology and Ecology 3: 135-153. (In Russ.).
Korona VV2002. On similarities and differences between morphological concepts of Linnaeus and Goethe. Biology Bulletin Reviews6 (3): 227-235. (In Russ.).
Kostina M.V, Barabanshchikova NS, Bityugova G.V., Yasinskaya O.I, Dubakh AM2015. Structural modifications of birch (Betula pendula Roth.) in relation to environmental conditions. Contemporary problems of ecology 22 (5): 710-724. https://doi.org/10.15372 / SEJ20150505. (In Russ.).
Marfenin NN. 1999. The development of modular organization conception. Biology Bulletin Reviews 60 (1): 617. (In Russ.).
Millet J, Bouchard A, Йdelin C. 1999. Relationship between architecture and successional status of trees in the temperate deciduous forest. Йcoscience 6 (2): 187203.
Morozov G.F. 1930. Doctrine of the forest. 5th edition. Moscow, Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoye izdatel'stvo. 440 p. (In Russ.).
Novosel'tsev V.D, Bugayev VA 1985. Oakeries. Moscow: Agropromizdat. 214 p.
O'Connell BM, Kelty MJ 1994. Crown architecture of understory and open-grown white pine (Pinus strobus L.) saplings. Tree Physiology14: 89-102.
Nukhimovsky EE. 1997. Fundamentals of biomorphology of spermous plants. T. 1. Theory of biomorph organization. Moscow: Nedra. 630 p.
Rambault P, Tanguy M 1993. La gestion des arbres d'ornement. 1re partie: Une mйthode d'analyse et de namic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Annals of botany 99: 375-407. https://doi.org/1Q.1093/aob/md260.
Charles-Dominique T, Йdelin C, Bouchard A 2010. Architectural strategies of Cornus sericea,a native but invasive shrub of Southern Quebec, Canada, under an open or a closed canopy. Annals of Botany 105: 205220. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp273.
Costes, E, Lauri P. Й, RegnardJ. L. 2006. Analyzing Fruit Tree Architecture: Implications for tree management and fruit production. Horticultural Reviews32. 61 p.
Йdelin C. 1991. Nouvelles donnйes sur l'architecture des arbres sympodiaux: le concept de plan d'organisation. In: L'Arbre: Biologie et Dйveloppement Proceedlings of the Naturalia Monspeliensia, 2nd International Tree Conference. Montpellier. Pp. 127-154.
Evstigneev O.I., Korotkov V.N. 2016. Ontogenetic stages of trees: an overview. Russian Journal of Ecosystem Ecology 1 (2): 1-31. https://doi.org/10.21685/2500- 0578-2016-2-1.
Hallйj F, Oldeman RA, Tomlinson P.B. 1978. Tropical trees and architectural analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag. 445 p.
Kawamura K2010. A conceptual framework for the study of modular responses to local environmental heterogeneity within the plant crown and a review of related concepts. Ecological Research 25: 733-744.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-009-0688-0.
Millet J, Bouchard A, Йdelin C. 1999. Relationship between architecture and successional status of trees in the temperate deciduous forest. Йcoscience 6 (2): 187-203.
O'Connell B.M., Kelty MJ 1994. Crown architecture of understory and open-grown white pine (Pinus strobus L.) saplings. Tree Physiology14: 89-102.
Raimbault, P, Tanguy M 1993. La gestion des arbres d'ornement. 1re partie: Une mйthode d'analyse et de diagnostic de la partie aйrienne. Revue forestiиre franзaise. 25(2): 97-117.
diagnostic de la partie aйrienne. Revue forestiиre franзaise. 25(2): 97-117.
Riabtsev I S, Tikhodeeva M. Iu, Riabtseva I M. 2009. Under shelterwood regeneration of woody plants in oak-dominated (QuercusroburL.) broadleaf stands of different age. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Series 3. Biology2: 11-21. (In Russ.).
Richards P. 1961. The tropical rain forest. An ecological study. Moscow: Izdatelstvo inostrannoy literatury. 448 p. (In Russ.).
Savinykh N.P., Maltseva ТА. 2008. Plant's modules as structure and category. Herald of TVGU Series: Biology and Ecology9: 227-233. (In Russ.).
Savinykh N.P.,Cheryomushkina VA 2015. Biomorphology: current status and prospects. Contemporary problems of ecology 22 (5): 659-670.
https://doi.org/10.15372/ SEJ20150501. (In Russ.).
Serebryakov I.G. 1962. Ecological morphology of plants. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 380 p. (In Russ.).
Sharovkina M.M., Antonova IS. 2011. Some structural features of the crown of young reproductive trees of Tilia platyphyllos Scop. in different ecological conditions. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Series 3. Biology3: 26-36. (In Russ.).
Shift P.G. 1952. Biological basis of agricultural machinery for fruit growing. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo selskokhozyaystvennoy literatury. 360 p.
Smirnova O.V., Bobrovsky M.V.2004. A nomadic oak. Priroda 12: 26-30. (In Russ.).
Stamenov M.N. 2016. Structural and functional diversity and quantitative parameters of two-year shoot systems of pregenerative individuals of Quercus robur L. (Fa- gaceae) in different light conditions in the central part of European Russia. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Series3 1: 49-61. (In Russ.).
Tsarev A. P, Pogiba S. P, Trenin V. V2003. Breeding and Reproduction of Forest Tree Species. The textbook for high schools. Moscow: Logos. 520 p.
Zhukova LA, Komarov AS. 1990. Polyvariance of ontogenesis and plant cenopopulation dynamics. Biology bulletin review51(4) : 450-461. (In Russ.).