20. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 578-588. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.578
21. Duncan, J., Ward, R., & Shapiro, K. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369(6478), 313-315.doi:10.1038/369313a0
22. Egeth, H. E., Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., Nakama, T., & Hendel, S. K. (2001). Attentional Capture in the Spatial and Temporal Domains. Advances in Psychology, 93-119.doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(01)80007-8
23. Gorbunova, E. S. (2017). Perceptual similarity in visual search for multiple targets. Acta Psychologica, 173, 46-54.doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.010
24. Hari, R., Valta, M., & Uutela, K. (1999). Prolonged attentional dwell time in dyslexic adults. Neuroscience Letters, 271(3), 202-204. doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00547-9
25. Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Neuropsychological analogies of inattentional blindness. Psyche, 6(16)
26. Fleck, M. S., Samei, E., & Mitroff, S. R. (2010). Generalized “satisfaction of search”: Adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(1), 60-71. doi:10.1037/a0018629
27. Jolicoeur, P. (1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26(5), 1014-1032.doi:10.3758/bf03201180
28. Sy, J. L., & Giesbrecht, B. (2009). Target-target similarity and the attentional blink: Task-relevance matters! Visual Cognition, 17(3), 307-317. doi:10.1080/13506280802349746
29. Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27(2), 117-143. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90016-3
30. Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 30-47.doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.30
31. Kwak, H. -W., Dagenbach, D., & Egeth, H. (1991). Further evidence for a time independent shift of the focus of attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 49(5), 473-480.
32. Lin, P.-H., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The influence of similarity on visual working memory representations. Visual Cognition, 17(3), 356-372.doi:10.1080/13506280701766313
33. Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., & Shapiro, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383(6601), 616-618. doi:10.1038/383616a0
34. McArthur, G., Budd, T., & Michie, P. (1999). The attentional blink and P300. NeuroReport, 10(17), 3691-3695.doi:10.1097/00001756-199911260-00042
35. Morris, A. L., Still, M. L., & Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2009). Repetition blindness: An emergent property of inter-item competition. Cognitive Psychology, 58(3), 338-375.doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.001
36. Nieuwenstein M. Memory and Attention. In A. Johnston & R.W. (2004) Proctor (Eds.) Attention Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 191-226.
37. Olivers, C. N. L. (2007). The Time Course of Attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 11-15. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00466.x
38. Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006). The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 364-379. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.364
39. Peterson, M. S., & Juola, J. F. (2000). Evidence for Distinct Attentional Bottlenecks in Attention Switching and Attentional Blink Tasks. The Journal of General Psychology, 127(1), 6-26.doi:10.1080/00221300009598568
40. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849-860. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849
41. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1995). Similarity determines the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 653-662. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.
42. Sy, J. L., & Giesbrecht, B. (2009). Target-target similarity and the attentional blink: Task-relevance matters! Visual Cognition, 17(3), 307-317. doi:10.1080/13506280802349746
43. Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1656-1674. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656
44. Weichselgartner E., Sperling G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238(4828), 778-780.
45. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (2005). Repetition Blindness in Rapid Lists: Activation and Inhibition Versus Construction and Attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 54-67.doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.54
46. Wierda, S. M., van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N. A., & Martens, S. (2012). Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(22), 8456-8460.doi:10.1073/pnas.1201858109
47. Wolfe, J. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention. London, UK: University College London Press.
48. Wolfe, J. M., Alaoui Soce, A., & Schill, H. M. (2017). How did I miss that? Developing mixed hybrid visual search as a “model system” for incidental finding errors in radiology. Cognitive Research, 2(1), 35. http://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0072-5
49. Yang, H., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets. Vision Research, 49(16), 2095-2103.doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.017
50. Zhuang, X., & Papathomas, T. V. (2011). Cue relevance effects in conjunctive visual search: Cueing for location, color, and orientation. Journal of Vision, 11(7), 6-6. doi:10.1167/11.7.6