10. Christen, M., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Herrmann, D., van den Hoven, J. “Beyond Informed Consent - Investigating Ethical Justifications for Disclosing, Donating or Sharing Personal Data in Research”, Philosophy and Computing. Essays in Epistemology, Philosophy of Mind, Logic, and Ethics, ed. T.M. Powers. Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 193-207.
11. Geneviиve, L.D., Martani, A., Wangmo, T., et al. “Participatory Disease Surveillance Systems: Ethical Framework”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2019, No. 21, Issue 5 [https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6660191/, accessed on 04.06.2020].
12. Gould, C.C. “How Democracy Can Inform Consent: Cases of the Internet and Bioethics”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2019, Vol. 36, Issue 2, pp. 173-191.
13. Harold, J. “The Ethics of Non-Realist Fiction: Morality's Catch-22”, Philosophia, 2007, Vol. 35, Issue 2, pp. 145-159.
14. Heller, J. Catch-22. N.Y.: Simon & Schuster, 1999. 416 pp.
15. Herschel, R., Miori, V.M. “Ethics & Big Data”, Technology in Society, 2017, No. 49, pp. 31-36.
16. Hofmann, B. “Broadening Consent: And Diluting Ethics?”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 2009, No. 35 (2), pp. 125-129.
17. Holm, S., Ploug, Th. “Big Data and Health Research - The Governance Challenges in a Mixed Data Economy”, Bioethical Inquiry, 2017, No. 14, pp. 515-525.
18. Kodeks ehtiki ispol'zovaniya dannykh [Data Ethics Code] [https://ac.gov.ru/projects/project/ kodeks-etiki-ispolzovania-dannyh-5, accessed on 02.06.2020]. (In Russian)
19. Lanzing, M. “`Strongly Recommended' Revisiting Decisional Privacy to Judge Hypernudg- ing in Self-Tracking Technologies”, Philosophy and Technology, 2019, No. 32, pp. 549-568.
20. Mittelstadt, B.D., Floridi, L. “The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 2016, Vol. 22, pp. 303-341.
21. Popova, O.V. “Eticheskie podkhody k normativnomu regulirovaniyu ispol'zovaniya gene- ticheski modifitsirovannykh organizmov: evropeiskii opyt” [Ethical Approaches to the Normative Regulation of the Use of Genetically Modified Organisms: European Experience], Mezhdunarod- noe pravo, 2019, No. 1, pp. 28-36. (In Russian)
22. The Precautionary Principle. CoMEST. Paris: UNESCO, 2005. 52 pp.
23. Prokofyev, A.V., Apressyan, R.G. Ekologicheskaya etika [Environmental Ethics]. Moscow: Ai Pi Er Media Publ., 2019. 96 pp. (In Russian)
24. Prokofyev, A.V. “Problema predostorozhnosti: normativnyi kontekst, istoki aktual'nosti, al'ternativnye resheniya” [The problem of precaution: normative context, grounds for urgency, alterative solutions], Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Filosofiya, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 291-300. (In Russian)
25. Ruotsalainen, P., Blobel, B. “Health Information Systems in the Digital Health Ecosystem - Problems and Solutions for Ethics, Trust and Privacy”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, No. 17 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246854/, accessed on 04.06.2020].
26. Savelyev, A.I. “Problemy primeneniya zakonodatel'stva o personal'nykh dannykh v epokhu «Bol'shikh dannykh» (Big Data)” [The Issues of Implementing Legislation on Personal Data in the Era of Big Data], Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2015, No. 1, pp. 43-66. (In Russian)
27. Sidorova, T.A., Zhichina, E.Yu. “Bioeticheskoe soderzhanie informirovannogo dobro- vol'nogo soglasiya” [Bioethical Contents Informed Consent], Meditsinskoe pravo: teoriya i praktika, 2016, Vol. 2, No. 1 (3), pp. 239-244. (In Russian)
28. Spector-Bagdadya, K., Jagsi, R. “Big Data, Ethics, and Regulations: Implications for Consent in the Learning Health System”, Medical Physics, 2018, Vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 845-847.
29. Sychev, A.A., Kurmaeva, K.K. “Evolyutsiya printsipa predostorozhnosti v ekologicheskoi etike” [Evolution of the precautionary principle in environmental ethics], Gumanitarnye nauki I obrazovanie, 2014, No. 1 (17), pp. 100-103. (In Russian)
30. Taylor, L. “The Ethics of Big Data as a Public Good: Which Public? Whose Good?”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2016, Vol. 374, Issue 2083 [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/ rsta.2016.0126, accessed on 02.06.2020].
31. Varley-Winter, O., Shah, H. “The Opportunities and Ethics of Big Data: Practical Priorities for a National Council of Data Ethics”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2016, Vol. 374, Issue 2083 [https:// royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.2016.0116, accessed on 02.06.2020].
32. Vayena, E., Blasimme, A. “Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance”, Bioethical Inquiry, 2017, No. 14, pp. 501-513.
33. Weichert, T. “Gesundheitsdatenschutz in vernetzten Zeiten”, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2018, Bd. 61, S. 285-290.
34. Wurtzburg, S.J., Simmons, S.J., Souza, E.A. Tuskegee Experiment”, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Pharmacology and Society, ed. S.E. Boslaugh. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2015, pp. 1448-1455.