23. Kotchen M. J., Boyle K. J., Leiserowitz A. A. (2013). Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States. Energy Policy, 55, 617-625.

24. Leary R., Minton E., Mittelstaedt J. (2016). Thou Shall Not? The Influence of Religion on Beliefs of Stewardship and Dominion, Sustainable Behaviors, and Marketing Systems. Journal of Macromarketing. 36.

25. Miller, J.D., & Inglehart, R. (2012). Public Attitudes toward Science and Technology. Leadership in science and technology: a reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE, 298-307

26. Minton E.A. (2013) Religion and religiosity's influence on sustainable consumption behaviors/ L.R. Kahle, E. Gurel-Atay (Eds.), Communicating sustainability for the green economy, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 73-87

27. Mumpower J.L., Liu X., Vedlitz A. (2016) Predictors of the perceived risk of climate change and preferred resource levels for climate change management programs. Journal of Risk Research, 19 (6), 798-809.

28. Muсoz-Garcнa A. (2014). Religion and Environmental Concern in Europe. Archive for the Psychology of Religion. 36. 323-343.

29. Newman T.P., Fernandes R. (2016) A re-assessment of factors associated with environmental concern and behavior using the 2010 General Social Survey. Environmental Education Research, 22 (2), 153-175.

30. Pammet J.H. (2015). Faith that science will solve environmental problems: does it hurt or help? Environmental Politics, 24(4), 553-574

31. Pammett J.H. (1997). Environmental concern, religious belief and faith in science: Complementary or antagonistic values? In: I.A. Frizzell and J.H. Pammett, eds. Shades of green: environmental attitudes in Canada and around the world. Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 129-146

32. Rivas F., Ergun S. (2019). The effect of social roles, religiosity, and values on climate change concern: An empirical analysis for Turkey. Sustainable Development

33. Shao S., Zhihua T., Meiting F. (2018). Do the rich have stronger willingness to pay for environmental protection? New evidence from a survey in China. World Development, 105, 83-94.

34. Sun C., Yuan X., & Xu M. (2016). The public perceptions and willingness to pay: From the perspective of the smog crisis in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1635-1644.

35. Sun C., Yuan X., Yao X. (2016). Social acceptance towards the air pollution in China: Evidence from public's willingness to pay for smog mitigation. Energy Policy, 92, 313-324.

36. Taniguchi H., Marshall G. (2018). Trust, political orientation, and environmental behavior. Environmental Politics, 27, 1-26.

37. Vaidyanathan B. Khalsa S., Ecklund E. (2018). Naturally Ambivalent: Religion's Role in Shaping Environmental Action. Sociology of Religion. 79.

38. Vainio, A., Paloniemi, R.(2014). The complex role of attitudes toward science in pro-environmental consumption in the Nordic countries. Ecological Economics. 108. 18-27. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.026.

39. Vianello M., Moore G. (2004). Women and Men in Political and Business Elites: A Comparative Study in the Industrialized World. London: SAGE.

40. White L. The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203-1207.

41. Xiao C. (2013). Public attitudes toward science and technology and concern for the environment: testing a model of indirect feedback effects. Environment and Behavior, 45 (1), 113-137

42. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy - YCELP - Yale University, Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University, World Economic Forum - WEF, and Joint Research Centre - JRC - European Commission. 2012. 2012 Environmental Performance Index and Pilot Trend Environmental Performance Index. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H48913SG.

43. Zelezny L.C., Chua P., Aldrich C. (2000). Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443-457.

44. МГЭИК (2014). Изменение климата, 2014 г.: Обобщающий доклад. Вклад Рабочих групп I, II и III в Пятый оценочный доклад Межправительственной группы экспертов по изменению климата [основная группа авторов, Р.К. Пачаури и Л.А. Мейер (ред.)]. МГЭИК, Женева, Швейцария, 163 стр.

Приложение

Вариация свободного члена в итоговых моделях по странам

Рисунок 5 Вариация когнитивного компонента экологической обеспокоенности по странам

Рисунок 6 Вариация конативного компонента экологической обеспокоенности по странам

Рисунок 7 Вариация когнитивного(материального) компонента экологической обеспокоенности по странам

Рисунок 8 Случайные эффекты отношения к науке в связи с переменной когнитивный компонент

Рисунок 9 Случайные эффекты отношения к науке в связи с переменной конативный (материальный) компонент