20. Мазюк Р.В. Процессуальные интересы участников уголовного судопроизводства // Сибирские уголовно-процессуальные и криминалистические чтения. 2017. № 4. С. 76-84.
21. Трубникова Т.В. Право на справедливое судебное разбирательство: правовые позиции европейского суда по правам человека и их реализация в уголовном процессе Российской Федерации. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2011. 296 с.
22. Курс уголовного процесса / под ред. Л.В. Головко. М.: Статут, 2016. 1278 с.
References
1. Meli, M. (2016) Trials in absentia: erosion of the rights of accused?: a comparative study. [Online] Available from: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/17510.
2. Kunitsyn, A. (1843) Istoricheskoe izobrazhenie drevnego sudoproizvodstva v Rossii [Historical depiction of ancient legal proceedings in Russia]. St. Petersburg: Tipografiya Vtorogo otdeleniya Sobstvennoy E.I.V. Kantselyarii.
3. Dukhovskoy, M.V. (1895) Iz lektsiy po ugolovnomu protsessu [From lectures on the criminal procedure]. Moscow: Tipografiya Obshchestva rasprostraneniya poleznykh knig.
4. Mazyuk, R.V. & Zadorozhnyy, V.D. (2016) Zashchita protsessual'nykh interesov obvinyaemogo pri zaochnom poryadke izbraniya mery presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu [Protection of procedural interests of the accused in absentia in order to select a preventive measure in the form of imprisonment]. Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal--Academical law journal. 2 (64). pp. 40-48.
5. Trofimova, E.V. (2009) Zaochnoe sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo ugolovnykh del: normativnoe regulirovanie ipraktikaprimeneniya [Trial in absentia in criminal cases: normative regulation and practice of application]. Abstract of Law Cand. Diss. Voronezh.
6. Karyakin, E.A. (2015) Problematika zaochnogo sudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu [The problem of trial in absentia in the criminal case]. Ugolovnyy protsess. 6. pp. 75-79.
7. Smirnova, I.G. (2011) Sotsial'naya tsennost' ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [The social value of criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Yurlitinform.
8. Wiley, P. (2014) Trials in absentia and the cuts to criminal legal aid. Journal of Criminal Law. 78:6. pp. 486-510. DOI: 10.1177/0022018314557412
9. Trubnikova, T.V. (2008) Rassmotrenie dela v otsutstvie podsudimogo (zaochnoe proizvodstvo) v sisteme uproshchennykh sudebnykh ugolovno-protsessual'nykh proizvodstv [Examination of the case in the absence of the defendant (proceedings in absentia) in the system of simplified criminal proceedings]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta -- Tomsk State University Journal. 315. pp. 127-133. (In Russian).
10. Sherman, L.W. (1993) Defiance, Deterrence, and irrelevance: a Theory of Criminal Sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 30:4. pp. 445-473.
11. McLean, K. & Wolfe, S.E. (2016) A Sence of Injustice Loosens the Moral Bind of Law. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 43:1. pp. 27-44. DOI: 10.1177/0093854815609655
12. Spohn, C. (2009) How do judges decide? The search for fairness and justice in punishment. Second edition. Sage Publications, Inc. [Online] Available from: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/how-do-judges-decide/book232267#.
13. Popova, I.P. (2016) Spravedlivoe pravosudie [Fair Justice]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo -- Criminal Judicial Proceeding. 2. pp. 7-13.
14. Borodinova, T.G. (2016) The review of court judgments passed in the absence of a defendant. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo -- Society: politics, economics, law. 4. pp. 80-82. (In Russian).
15. Andreeva, O.I. et al. (2016) The court of appeal's right to return a criminal case to the first-instance court: a possibility of power abuse. Vse- rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal -- Russian Journal of Criminology. 10:3. pp. 554-567. (In Russian).
16. Dikarev, I.S. (2014) Preyuditsial'nost' sudebnykh resheniy v ugolovnom protsesse [The prejudiciality of judicial decisions in the criminal procedure]. Zakonnost'. 10. pp. 51-53.
17. Burganov, B.R. (2016) Institut preyuditsii v sovremennom rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [The institution of prejudice in the modern Russian criminal trial]. Law Cand. Diss. Kazan.
18. Shakit'ko, R.V. & Fidel'skiy, S.V. (2014) Preyuditsiya v ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave: normativnoe zakreplenie i poryadok i realizatsii [Prejudice in the criminal procedure law: normative consolidation and implementation]. Krasnodar: Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
19. Smol'kova, I.V. & Mazyuk, R.V. (2016) Legal, illegal and procedural interests of the accused person in Russian criminal procedure. Kriminolog- icheskiy zhurnal Baykal 'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava -- Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law. 10:1. pp. 156-169. (In Russian).
20. Mazyuk, R.V. (2017) Procedural Interests of Criminal Proceedings Participants. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie cht- eniya -- Siberian Criminal Process and Criminalistic Readings. 4. pp. 76-84. (In Russian).
21. Trubnikova, T. V. (2011) Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel 'stvo: pravovye pozitsii evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka i ikh reali- zatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The right to a fair trial: the legal position of the European Court of Human Rights and their implementation in the criminal procedure of the Russian Federation]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University.
22. Golovko, L.V. (ed.) (2016) Kurs ugolovnogoprotsessa [The course of the criminal procedure]. Moscow: Statut.