6. Kanashevsky VA. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik [Private international law: textbook]. 4th ed. Moscow: International Relations Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).
7. Kiskachi MA. Ispolzovanie printsipov unidrua v mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe v otsutstvie soglasheniya storon ob ikh primenenii [The use of the UNIDROIT Principles in international commercial arbitration in the absence of an agreement between the parties on their application]. Electronic Supplement to the Russian Juridical Journal. 2019;2. (In Russ.).
8. Kuznetsov MN. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo kak mezhsistemnaya sovokupnost pravovykh norm [Private international law as an intersystem set of legal norms]. In: Golubtsov VG, Kuznetsova OA (eds). 7th Perm Congress of Legal Scholars: Collection of Scientific Articles. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
9. Luntz LA, Marysheva NI. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: v 3 t [The course of private international law: in 3 volumes]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1976. (In Russ.).
10. Majorina MV. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo v usloviyakh globalizatsii: ot razgosudarstvleniya k fragmentatsii [International private law in the context of globalization: from denationalization to fragmentation]. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2018;1. (In Russ.).
11. Dmitrieva GK (ed). Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik [International private law: textbook]. 4th ed. Moscow: Prospect Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).
12. Mullerson RA. Sootnoshenie mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo, mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo i natsionalnogo prava [Correlation of international public, international private and national law]. The Soviet State and Law. 1982;2. (In Russ.).
13. Neshataeva TN. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnyy grazhdanskiy protsess: uchebnyy kurs: v 3 ch [Private international law and international civil process: training course: in 3 parts]. Moscow: Gorodets; 2004. (In Russ.).
14. Terentyeva LV. Razreshenie arbitrazhnymi tsentrami domennykh sporov po protsedure UDRp [Resolution of domain disputes by arbitration centers under the UDRP procedure]. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2014;4. (In Russ.).
15. Shakhnazarov BA. Kompleksnaya vzaimosvyaz blokcheyn-tekhnologii i obektov intellektualnoy sobstvennosti v transgranichnykh chastnopravovykh otnosheniyakh [Complex interconnection of blockchain technology and intellectual property in cross-border private law relations]. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2019;5. (In Russ.).
16. Cafaggi F. A analysis of transnational private comparative regulation: legitimacy, quality, effectiveness and enforcement. Available at: http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/acomparative-analysis-of- transnational-private-regulation-fcafaggi_12062014.pdf (Accessed: 01 Sept 2017).
17. Fernandez Arroyo DP, Mbengue MM. Public and private international law in international courts and tribunals: evidence of an inescapable interaction. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2018;56(4).
18. Goldmann M. A matter of perspective: Global governance and the distinction between public and private authority (and not law). Global Constitutionalism [March 2016].
19. Douglas MC, Bath V, Dickinson A, Keyes M. Commercial Issues in Private International Law: A Common Law Perspective (Studies in Private International Law). Hart Publishing; 2019.
20. Kulms R. Blockchains: Private Law Matters. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. Mar. 2020.
21. Marzorati OJ. Book Abstract. Commercial Issues in Private International Law: A Common Law Perspective (Studies in Private International Law). Business Law International. 2020;1.
22. Mills A. Private international law and EU external relations: think local act global, or think global act local? International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 2016;65(3).