10. Viveiros de Castro E.B. Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology. Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing, 2014:229.
11. Barad K. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham. London: Duke University Press, 2007:524.
12. Baxi U. The Posthuman and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007:249. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprofoso/9780198061762.003.0006
13. Miah A.A. Critical History of Posthumanism. Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology. Vol 2. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008:71-94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8852-0_6
14. Fukuyama F. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2002:272.
15. Fukuyama F. Transhumanism: The World's Most Dangerous Ideas. Foreign Policy. 2004;(144):42-43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/4152980
16. Pepperell J. The Posthuman Condition. Bristol: Intellect Books, 2003:208.
17. Kalpokas I. Algorithmic Governance. Politics and Law in the Post-Human Era. London: Palgrave Pivot, Cham, 2019:120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-31922-9_5
18. Wolfe C. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009:392.
19. Ferrando F. Philosophical Posthumanism. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019:296.
20. Morton T. Being ecological. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2018:216.
21. Braverman I. Law's Underdog: A Call for More-than-Human Legalities. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2018;14:127-144. Available at: https://
doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030820
22. Capra F., Mattei U. The Ecology of Law. Toward a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2015:240.
23. Kapica S. “I don't feel like a copy”: posthuman legal personhood and Caprica. Griffith Law Review. 2014;23(4):612-633. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2014.1014454
24. Braman S. Posthuman Law: Information Policy and the Machinic World. First Monday. 2002;7(12). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i12.1011
25. Braidotti R. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity, 2019:210.
26. Kapitonova E.A. The concept of the legal modus of personality: the meaning and functions of a new scientific category. Gumanitarnye chteniya v Politekhnicheskom universi- tete: sb. tr. Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 16 maya 2020 g.): v 2 ch. = Humanitarian readings of Polytechnical University: proceedings of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference (Saint-Petersburg, May 16, 2020): in 2 parts. Saint Petersburg: POLITEKh-PRESS, 2020;2:164-169. (In Russ.)
27. Petruchenko O.A. Latinsko-russkiy slovar': v 2 ch. Ch. 1. Ot A do M. = Latin-Russian Dictionary: ib 2 parts. Part 1. From A to M. Moscow: Yurayt, 2019:410. (In Russ.). Available at: https://biblio-online.ru/bcode/441238 (accessed 23.08.2022).
28. Patyulin V.A. Gosudarstvo i lichnost' v SSSR (Pravovye aspekty vzaimootnosheniy) = State and personality in the USSR (Legal aspects of relations). Moscow: Nauka, 1974:246. (In Russ.)
29. Vitruk N.V. Legal modus of personality: content and types. Problemy gosudarstva i prava. Trudy nauchnykh sotrudnikov i aspirantov. Vyp. 9 = Problems of state and law. Proceedings of researchers and graduate students. Edition 9. Moscow: Institut gosu- darstva i prava AN SSSR, 1974:43-50. (In Russ.)
30. Rovnyy V.V. On the category of “legal modus” and its content. Gosudarstvo i parvo = State and law. 1998:(4):86-88. (In Russ.)