43. Pravo i zakon v programmiruemom obshchestve [Law and Statute in the Programmed Society]. Moscow: The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law Under the Government of the Russian Federation.
44. Morkhat, PM. (2018) Pravosub”ektnost' iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfere prava intellektual'noy sobstvennosti: grazhdansko-pravovye problemy [Legal personality of artificial intelligence in the field of intellectual property law: civil law problems]. Law Dr. Diss. Moscow.
45. Larina, E.S. & Ovchinskiy, VS. (2019) Iskusstvennyy intellekt: etika ipravo [Artificial Intelligence: Ethics and law]. Moscow: Knizhnyy mir.
46. Starosel'tseva, Yu.M. (2020) [Can artificial intelligence replace the judge?] Suverennoe gosudarstvo i ego pravo: aktual'nye problemy yuridicheskoy nauki ipravoprimenitel'noypraktiki v sovremennoy Rossii (k 370-letiyu so vremeniprinyatiya Sobornogo Ulozheniya (1649goda) [The Sovereign State and Its Law: Actual Problems of Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice in Modern Russia (to the 370th anniversary of the adoption of the Cathedral Code (1649)]. Proceedings of the 16th All-Russian December Law Readings. Vol. 2. Kostroma. 12-13 December 2019. Kostroma: Kostroma State University. (In Russian).
47. TASS. (2019) V Verkhovnom sude schitayut, chto roboty nikogda ne smogut zamenit' sud'yu [The Supreme Court believes that robots will never be able to replace a judge]. TASS.
48. Klub “Valday” [Valdai Club]. (2017) Yurisprudentsiya i iskusstvennyy intellekt: nastupaet epokha bespretsedentnykh vyzovov [Law and Artificial Intelligence: An Era of Unprecedented Challenges is Coming]. [Online]
49. Kleandrov, M.I. (2018) Digital economy and problems of the mechanism of justice. Ekonomika. Pravo. Obshchestvo -- Economics. Law. Society. 1 (13). pp. 28-35. (In Russian).
50. Kucherena, A.G. (2017) Komp'yuter vynosit prigovory [The computer makes judgments]. Izvestiya. [Online]
51. Trapeznikov, A. (2018) V Permi razrabotali programmu, pomogayushchuyu sud'yam vynosit' prigovor [In Perm, a program has been developed to help judges pass sentence]. Rossiyskaya gazeta -- Russian Gazette. [Online]
52. Chistilina, D.O. (2017) Predsedatel'stvuyushchiy kak nositel' sudebnoy vlasti [The presiding judge as the bearer of the judiciary]. In: Ugolovno- protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskieproblemy bor 'by sprestupnost'yu [Criminal Procedure and Forensic Problems in the Fight against Crime]. Orel: [s.n.].
53. Zhilkin, V.A. (2018) Artificial intelligence and digital technologies in the legal activity in the conditions of digital reality (case-study of Finland). Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya -- Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 5 (72). (In Russian).
54. Gadzhiev, G.A. (2017) Budushchee robotov v yurisprudentsii [The future of robots in jurisprudence]. RIA Novosti. [Online]
55. Il'ya, K. (2019) Pravosudie po-estonski: sudey zamenyat komp'yuterom [Justice in Estonian: judges will be replaced by a computer]. Pravda -- TVru.
56. Katz, D., Bommarito, I.M. &Blackmann, J. (2017) A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. PLOS ONE. 4 (12). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174698
57. Johnston, C. et al. Artificial Intelligence `judge' developed by UCL computer scientists. The Guardian. [Online]
58. Taruffo, M. (1998) Judicial Decisions and Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2-4 (6). pp. 207-220.
59. Great Britain. Dept. for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2018) Industrial Strategy: Artificial Intelligence Sector Deal. [Online]
60. Robopravo. (2008) Zakon Yuzhnoy Korei o sodeystvii razvitiyu i rasprostraneniyu umnykh robotov ot 28 marta 2008 g. N° 9014 [Law of South Korea on promoting the development and dissemination of smart robots dated March 28, 2008 No. 9014].
61. Robopravo. Issledovatel'skiy tsentr problem regulirovaniya robototekhniki i iskusstvennogo intellekta [Robopravo. Research Centre for Problems of Regulation of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence]. [Online] Available from: robopravo.ru/zakon_iuzhnoi_koriei_2008 (Accessed: 11.06.2021).
62. Lee, K.-F. (2019) Sverkhderzhavy iskusstvennogo intellekta. Kitay, Kremnievaya dolina i novyy mirovoy poryadok[AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order]. Translated from English. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber.
63. Petrovskiy, S.V. (2021) Mozhet li iskusstvennyy intellekt zamenit' sud'yu [Can artificial intelligence replace a judge]. Nezavisimaya gazeta. [Online]
64. Ivanov, S. (2019) V Kitae otklyuchat iskusstvennyy intellekt Zero Trust - on slishkom uspeshno borolsya s korruptsiey chinovnikov v strane [In China, the artificial intelligence Zero Trust will be turned off - it fought too successfully against corruption of officials in the country]. Khaytek. [Online] Available from: (Accessed: 17.06.2021).
65. Sheremet'eva, N.V., Baturo I.V. & Shuan, U. (2020) Features of Electronic Justice in the PRC. Pravo i praktika -- The Law and Practice. 2. pp. 159-163. (In Russian).
66. Devlin, H. (2018) Software 'no more accurate than untrained humans' at judging reoffending risk. The Guardian. [Online]
67. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2019) European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
68. Andreev, V.K., Laptev, V.A. & Chucha, S.Yu. (2020) Artificial intelligence in the system of electronic justice by consideration of corporate disputes. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo -- Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law. 1 (11). (In Russian).