Статья: Наречные ремарки и их функции в драматургическом дискурсе

Внимание! Если размещение файла нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам

17. Stoppard Tom. Arcadia. London: Faber & Faber, 1993. 144 p.

18. Stoppard Tom. Dirty Linen & New-Found-Land. New York: Grove Press, 1976. 55 p.

19. Stoppard Tom. Dog's Hamlet, Cahoot's Macbeth. London: Faber & Faber, 1980. 80 p.

20. Stoppard Tom. Every Good Boy Deserves Favor and Professional Foul. New York: Grove Press, 1994. 188 p.

21. Stoppard Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. New York: Grove Press, 2017. 128 p.

22. Stoppard Tom. The Real Inspector Hound and Other Plays. New York: Grove Press, 1998. 211 p.

23. Stoppard Tom. The Real Thing. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1984. 81 p.

References

1. Bochaver S. Yu. Sintaksis i semantika remarki. O nekotoryh osobennostyah metayazyka teatra [Syntax and semantics of the remark. On some features of the meta-language of theatre]. Pod znakom «meta». Yazyki i metayazyki v prostranstve kul'tury [Under 'meta'. Languages and metalanguages in the space of culture]. 2011, pp. 334-341. (In Russian).

2. Zhenett Zh. Posvyashcheniya. Per., vstup. st., primech. L. Semenovoj [Dedications. Translated, preface, note by L. Semyonova]. Antropologiya kul'tury [Anthropology of culture]. 2004, no. 2, pp. 187-218. (In Russian).

3. ZorinA.N. Poetika remarki russkoj dramaturgii XVIII-XIX vekov. Avtoreferat dissertacii... doktora filologicheskih nauk: 10.01.01 [The Poetics of Remarque in Russian Dramaturgy in the 18th and 19th Centuries. D. in Philology: 10.01.01]. Saratov, STU Publ., 2008, 38 p. (In Russian).

4. Kabykina Yu.V. Ramochnyj tekst v dramaticheskom proizvedenii (A.N. Ostrovskij i A.P. Chekhov). Dissertaciya... kandidata filologicheskih nauk: 10.01.08 [The Frame Text in a Dramatic Work (A.N. Ostrovsky and A.P. Chekhov). D. in Philology: 10.01.08]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 2009, 205 p. (In Russian).

5. Kozlova L.A. Funkcional'nyj diapazon anglijskih narechij i ih vklad v realizaciyu osnovnyh funkcij yazyka [The functional range of English adverbs and their contribution to the basic functions of language]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive language research]. 2016, no. 24, pp. 378-387. (In Russian).

6. Kubryakova E.S., Aleksandrova O.V. Dramaturgicheskie proizvedeniya kak osobyj ob"ekt diskursivnogo analiza (k postanovke problemy) [Dramaturgical works as a special object of discourse analysis (to the problem statement)]. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya «Literatura i yazyk» [Izvestia RAN. Literature and Language Series], 2008, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 4-10. (In Russian).

7. Limanovskaya I.B. Vzaimodejstvie angloyazychnogo dramaturgicheskogo diskursa s funkcional'nym potencialom avtorskoj remarki [The interaction of English-language dramaturgical discourse with the functional potential of the author's remark]. Vestnik Samarskogo gos. un-ta [Bulletin of the Samara State University], 2011, no. 1-1 (82), pp. 225-230. (In Russian)

8. Nikolina N.A. Remarki v tekste dramy. Filologicheskij analiz teksta. Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenij [Remarks in the drama text. The philological analysis of the text. A textbook for students of higher education institutions]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2003, 77 p. (In Russian).

9. Nosov S.O. Paratekst kak sredstvo konstruirovaniya hudozhestvennogo prostranstva v drame. Avtoreferat dissertacii... kandidata filologicheskih nauk: 10.01.08 [Paratext as a means of constructing artistic space in drama. D. in Philology: 10.01.08]. Tver, Tver State University Publ., 2010, 18 p. (In Russian).

10. Pavi P. Slovar' teatra [Theatre Dictionary]. Moscow. Progress Publ., 1991, 504 p. (In Russian).

11. Titova E.V. Dramaturgicheskij paratekst: k postanovke problem [Dramaturgical paratext: Towards a problem statement]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Literaturovedenie. Yazykoznanie. Kul'turologiya» [Bulletin of the Russian State University of Humanities. Literary Studies. Linguistics. Culturology], 2019, no. 2, pp. 30-40. (In Russian).

12. Tolcheeva K.V. Izuchenie dramaturgicheskogo parateksta v otechestvennoj nauke: problemy tipologii i vzaimodejstviya s dramaturgicheskim dialogom [The Study of Dramaturgical Paratext in Domestic Science: Problems of Typology and Interaction with Dramaturgical Dialogue]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya «Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikaciya» [Bulletin of Moscow State University. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication Series], 2014, no. 2, pp. 125-129. (In Russian).

13. Tolcheeva K.V. Semantiko-strukturnye i funkcional'nye osobennosti parateksta v modernistskoj i postmodernistskoj dramaturgii: na materiale francuzskogo yazyka. Avtoreferat dissertacii... kandidata filologicheskih nauk: 10.02.05 [Semantic-structural and functional features of paratext in modernist and postmodernist drama: based on the French language. D. in Philology: 10.02.05]. Voronezh, Voronezh State University Publ., 2007, 24 p. (In Russian).

14. HalizevE.V. Teoriya literatury [Literary theory]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2002, 438 p. (In Russian).

15. Shlyahova M.M. Koncept «obraz dejstviya» i sredstva ego yazykovoj reprezentacii v sovremennom anglijskom yazyke. Avtoreferat dissertacii... kandidata filologicheskih nauk: 10.02.04 [The concept "action image" and the means of its linguistic representation in modern English. D. in Philology: 10.02.04]. Barnaul, BGPU Publ., 2003, 19 p. (In Russian).

16. Stoppard Tom. After Magritte. London: Faber & Faber, 1971. 47 p.

17. Stoppard Tom. Arcadia. London: Faber & Faber, 1993. 144 p.

18. Stoppard Tom. Dirty Linen & New-Found-Land. New York: Grove Press, 1976. 55 p.

19. Stoppard Tom. Dog's Hamlet, Cahoot's Macbeth. London: Faber & Faber, 1980. 80 p.

20. Stoppard Tom. Every Good Boy Deserves Favor and Professional Foul. New York: Grove Press, 1994. 188 p.

21. Stoppard Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. New York: Grove Press, 2017. 128 p.

22. Stoppard Tom. The Real Inspector Hound and Other Plays. New York: Grove Press, 1998. 211 p.

23. Stoppard Tom. The Real Thing. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1984. 81 p.