32. Чернявская, В. Е. Интертекст и интердискурс как реализация текстовой открытости / В. Е. Чернявская // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2004. № 1 (001). С. 106-111.
33. Шабес, В. Я. Событие и текст / В. Я. Шабес. М., 1989. 175 с.
34. Шехтман, Н. А. От повествования к гипертексту и нарративу: монография / Н. А. Шехтман. Оренбург: Изд-во ОГПУ, 2014. 147 с.
35. Шмид, В. Нарратология / В. Шмид. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2003. 311 с.
36. Щербина, А. А. Сущность и искусство словесной остроты (каламбура). Киев: Изд-во академии наук украинской ССР, 1958. 68 с.
37. ABBYY Lingvo 6. Выпуск: 16.1.3.49. Аби продакшн, 2014.
38. Dickens, С. Bleak House I / С. Dickens. M.: T8RUGRAM / Original, 2018. 812 p.
39. Fairclough, N. Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language / N. Fairclough. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis group, 2013. 604 p.
40. Hoad, T. F. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology / T. F. Hoad. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. 552 p.
References
1. ABBYY Lingvo 6. Edition: 16.1.3.49. (2014). Abi prodakshn.
2. Archer, P. (1959). Angliiskayasudebnayasistema [English Judicial System]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury. 268 p.
3. Arhipov, I. K. (2008). Yazyk iyazykovaya lichnost' [Language and Linguistic Personality]. Saint Petersburg, Knizhnyi dom. 248 p.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (2012). Sobranie sochinenii [Collection of Works]. Vol. 3: Teoriya romana (1930-1961 gg.). Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur. 880 p.
5. Bremon, K. (1972). Logika povestvovatel'nykh vozmozhnostei [Logics of Narrative Capacities]. In Semiotika i iskusstvometriya. Moscow, Mir, pp. 108-135.
6. Budaev, E. V. (2020). Sopostavitel'nayapoliticheskaya metaforologiya [Contrastive Political Metaphorology]. Saint Petersburg, Naukoemkie tekhnologii. 464 p.
7. Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2004). Intertekst i interdiskurs kak realizatsiya tekstovoi otkrytosti [Intertext and Interdiscourse as Realization of Textual Openness]. In Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. No. 1 (001), pp. 106-111.
8. Deleuze, G., Gvattari, F. (1976). Rizoma [Rhizome]. Paris. 35 p.
9. Dickens, Ch. (1960). Sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [Collection of Works, in 30 vols.]. Vol. 17: Kholodnyi dom: Glavy I-XXX. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury. 564 p.
10. Dickens, Ch. (2018). Bleak House I. Moscow, T8RUGRAM / Original. 812 p.
11. Dyakov, A. V. (2012). Zhil' Delez. Filosofiya razlichiya [Gil Deleuze. Philosophy of Difference]. Saint Petersburg, Aleteiya. 504 p.
12. Dziuba, E. V., Ryabova, I. Yu. (2021). Transfer yuridicheskogo znaniya v narrativnoe prostranstvo khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya [Transfer of Legal Knowledge inti the Narrative Space of a Literary Text]. In Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya2: Gumanitarnye nauki. Vol. 23. No. 4, pp. 297-317.
13. Dziuba, E. V., Ryabova, I. Yu. (2022). Formal'no-soderzhatel'naya organizatsiya gibridnogo khudozhestvenno-pravovogo diskursa [Formal and Informative Organization of Hybrid Literary-Legal Discourse]. In Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriyayazyka. Semiotika. Semantika. Vol. 13. No. 2, pp. 433-454.
14. Dziuba, E. V., Ryabova, I. Yu. (2022). Kategoriya situativnosti v narrativnoi modeli khudozhestvenno-pravovogo diskursa [Category of Situativeness in Narrative Model of Literary-Legal Discourse]. In Nauchnyi dialog. Vol. 11. No. 5, pp. 69-98.
15. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study ofLanguage. London and New York, Routledge Taylor and Francis group. 604 p.
16. Genette, J. (1998). Figury:v2-kht. [Figures, in 2 vols.]. Vol. 1-2. Moscow, p. 944.
17. Hoad, T. F. (1996). The Concise Ohford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 552 p.
18. Hong, L. (2017). Osobennosti realizatsii politicheskogo diskursa v khudozhestvennom tekste: k postanovke problemy [Peculiarities of Realization of Political Discourse in a Literary Text: To the Statement of the Problem]. In Politicheskaya lingvistika. No. 3 (63), pp. 31-41.
19. Kibrik, A. A. (2003). Analizdiskursav kognitivnoiperspektive [Analysis of Discourse in the Cognitive Perspective]. Dis.... d-ra filol. nauk v forme nauchn. dokl. Moscow. 90 p.
20. Lotman, Yu. M. (1998). Obiskusstve [About Art]. Saint Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPB. 702 p.
21. Maslov, E. V. (2020). Chto takoenarrativ? [What is Narrative?]. Kazan, Izdatel'stvo Kazanskogo universiteta. 115 p.
22. Meshcherinov, P. Gendel' kak muzykant i chelovek. Lektsiya Igumena Petra (Meshcherinova) [Gendel as a Musician and a Person. Lecture by Father Superior Petr]. URL: https://shhshhshh.pravmir.ru/gendel-muzykant-i-chelovek.
23. Nabokov, V. V. (1998). Lektsii po zarubezhnoi literature [Lectures on Foreign Literature]. Moscow, Nezavisimaya Gazeta. 512 p.
24. Olizko, N. S. (2009). Semiotiko-sinergeticheskaya interpretatsiya osobennosti realizatsii intertekstual'nosti i interdiskursivnosti vpostmodernistskom khudozhestvennom diskurse [Semiotic-Synergetic Interpretation of Specific Characteristics of Realization of Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in post-modern literary discourse]. Dis.... d-ra filol. nauk. Chelyabinsk. 343 p.
25. Petrova, N. Yu. (2017). Printsipy i strategii perspektivizatsii v dramaticheskom tekste [Principles and Strategies of Perspectivization in a Dramatic Text]. dis.... d-ra filol. nauk. Moscow. 528 p.
26. Philips, L. J. (2004). Diskurs-analiz. Teoriyai metod [Discourse Analysis. Theory and Method]. Kharkov, Gumanitarnyi Tsentr. 336 p.
27. Popova, Z. D., Sternin, I. A. (2007). Semantiko-kognitivnyi analizyazyka [Semantic-Cognitive Analysis of a Text]. Voronezh, Izdatel'stvo «Istoki». 250 p.
28. Propp, V. Ya. (1976). Fol'klori deistvitel'nost' [Folklore and Reality]. Moscow. 325 p.
29. Repina, L. P. (Ed.). (2020). Proshloe dlya nastoyashchego: Istoriya-pamyat' i narrativy natsional'noi identichnosti [Past for Present: History-memory and Narratives of National Identity]. Moscow, Akvilon. 464 p.
30. Rudnev, V. P. (2000). Proch' ot real'nosti: issledovaniya po filosofii teksta [Away from Reality]. Moscow, Agraf. 428 p.
31. Serio, P. (1999). Kak chitayut teksty vo Frantsii [How Texts Are Read in France]. In Serio, P. (Ed.). Kvadratura smysla: Frantsuzskaya shkola analiza diskursa. Moscow, OAO IG «Progress».
32. Sevastyanova, A. L. (2018). Pragmalingvisticheskii analiz tsennostno-sobytiinogo diskursa [Pragmatic-Linguistic Analysis ofAxiological-eventful Discourse]. Dis.... kand. filol. nauk. Saint Petersburg. 202 p.
33. Shabes, V. Ya. (1989). Sobytie i tekst [Event and Text]. Moscow. 175 p.
34. Shcherbina, A. A. (1958). Sushchnost'iiskusstvoslovesnoiostroty (kalambura) [Essence and Art ofWord Witticism (Pun)]. Kiev, Izdatel'stvo akademii nauk ukrainskoi SSR. 68 p.
35. Shekhtman, N. A. (2014). Ot povestvovaniya kgipertekstu i narrativu [From Narration to Hypertext and Narrative]. Orenburg, Izdatel'stvo OGPU. 147 p.
36. Shmid, V. (2003). Narratologiya [Narratology]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury. 311 p.
37. Sinelnikova, L. N. (2017). Rizoma i diskurs intermedial'nosti [Rhizome in the Discourse of Intermediary]. In Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Lingvistika. Vol. 21. No. 4, pp. 805-821.
38. Tyupa, V. I. (2021). Gorizonty istoricheskoi narratologii [Horizons of Historic Narratology]. Saint Petersburg, Aleteiya. 270 p.
39. Walker, R. (1980). Angliiskayasudebnayasistema [English Judicial System]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura. 631 p.
40. Zavrumov, Z. A. (2015). Implikatsional khudozhestvennogo teksta: yazykovaya igra v ironicheskom moduse [Implicational of a Literary Text: Language Game in an Ironic Mode]. In Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. No. 4 (56), pp. 150-154.