Статья: Дискурсивная саморепрезентация личности в англоязычном межличностном общении: корпусный прагмасоциолингвистический анализ

Внимание! Если размещение файла нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам

14. Atai M., Sadr L., 2008. A cross-cultural genre study on hedging devices in discussion section of applied linguistics research articles. Teaching English Language and Literature Society of Iran, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 1-22. URL: http://www.sid.ir/En/ Journal/ViewPaper. aspx?ID= 162198. (accessed 24 May 2018).

15. Baker P., 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London; New York, Continuum. 198 p.

16. Boncea I.J., 2013. Hedging patterns used as mitigation and politeness strategies. Annals of the University of Craiova. Series: Philology. English, vol. 2, pp. 7-23. URL: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/ litere/activ_st/anale_engleza/Annals_vol2_ 2013_Limba.pdf. (accessed 23 May 2018).

17. Brezina V., 2018. Statistical choices in corpus-based discourse analysis. Taylor Ch., Marchi A., (eds.) Corpus Approaches to Discourse. Oxford, Routledge, pp. 259-280.

18. Downing A., 2015. English Grammar: a university course. New York, Routledge. 652 p.

19. Dubois B.L., Crouch I., 1975. The question of tag questions in women's speech: they don't really use more of them, do they? Language in Society, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 289-294.

20. Culpeper J.V., Kerswill P., Wodak R., McEnery T., Katamba F., (eds.), 2018. English language: description, variation and context. London, Palgrave Macmillan. 686 p.

21. Fox K., 2004. Watching the English. The hidden rules of English behavior. London, Hodder. 424 p.

22. Gabrielatos C., 2018. Keyness analysis: nature, metrics and techniques. Taylor Ch., Marchi A. (eds.) Corpus Approaches to Discourse. Oxford, Routledge, pp. 225-258.

23. Jovanovic V Z., Pavlovic V., 2014. The use of question tags with male and female speakers of English and Serbian. S. Guduric, M. Stefanovic. (eds.) Jezici i kulture u vremenu iprostoru III. Chapter: XLVI. Filozofski fakultet Univerzitet u Novom Sadu. pp. 491-504. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/298214908 (accessed 22 April 2018).

24. Ilyinova E.Yu., Kochetova L.A., 2016. Diachronic Perspective in Text and Discourse Studies: Review of Approaches. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2, Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.4.2.

25. Lakoff R., 1972. The Pragmatics of Modality. Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting. Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 229-246.

26. Lakoff R., 1975. Language and Woman'sPlace. New York, Harper and Row. 328 p.

27. McEnery T., Hardy A., 2011. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 301 p.

28. Partington A., 2010. Modern diachronic corpus- assisted discourse studies on UK newspapers: an overview of the project. Corpora, vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. 83-108.

29. Pearson J.C., West R., Turner L.H., 2005. Gender and Communication. New York, McGraw-Hill. 285 p.

30. Plotnikova S. N., 2013. Cognitive Scenario ofDiscourse of Deception // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 589-602.

31. Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J., et al., 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London, Longman. 1779 p.

32. Spencer-Oatey H., 2000. Rapport management: a framework for analysis. Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. London; New York, Continuum, pp. 11-46.

33. Stubbs M., 1983. Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language . Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. 279 p. Weiss S., 2015. 4 verbal habits of women that don't mean what you think they do, because the policing of women's language needs to stop. URL: https://www.bustle.com/articles/117516-4- verbalhabits-of-women-that-dont-mean-what- you-think-they-do-because-the-policing (accessed 7 March 2018).

34. Yang Y., 2013. Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 50 (1), pp. 23-36. DOI: 10.1016/ j.pragma.2013.01.008.

35. Yule G., 2006. The study of language: An introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 273 p.