46 |
ESC Guidelines |
(2)If you suspect acute PE, institute anticoagulation therapy as soon as possible, while the diagnostic workup is ongoing, unless the patient is bleeding or has absolute contraindications to this therapy.
(3)Use recommended, validated diagnostic algorithms for PE, including standardized assessment of (pre-test) clinical probability and D-dimer testing. They help to avoid unnecessary, expensive, and potentially harmful imaging tests and exposure to ionizing radiation.
(4)If the CTPA report suggests single subsegmental PE, consider the possibility of a false-positive finding. Discuss the findings again with the radiologist and/or seek a second opinion to avoid misdiagnosis, and unnecessary, potentially harmful anticoagulation treatment.
(5)Confirmation of PE in a patient, without haemodynamic instability, must be followed by further risk assessment involving clinical findings, evaluation of the size and/or function of the RV, and laboratory biomarkers as appropriate. This information will help you to decide on the need for reperfusion treatment or monitoring for patients at elevated risk, or consider the option of early discharge and continuation of anticoagulation on an ambulatory basis for patients at low risk.
(6)As soon as you diagnose (or strongly suspect) high-risk PE, select the best reperfusion option (systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, or catheter-directed treatment) considering the patient’s risk profile, and the resources and expertise available at your hospital. For patients with intermediate-high-risk PE, reperfusion is not first-line treatment, but you should prospectively plan the management strategy with your team to have a contingency plan ready if the situation deteriorates.
(7)Prefer anticoagulation with a NOAC over the ‘traditional’ LMWH-VKA regimen unless the patient has contraindication(s) to this type of drug.
(8)Always remember that, with the exception of acute PE provoked by a strong transient/reversible risk factor, there is a lifelong risk of VTE recurrence after a first episode of PE. Consequently, reexamine the patient after the first 3 - 6 months of anticoagulation, weigh the benefits vs. risks of continuing treatment, and decide on the extension and dose of anticoagulant therapy, also considering the patient’s preference. Remember to recommend regular follow-up examinations, e.g. at yearly intervals.
(9)If you suspect PE in a pregnant patient, consider diagnostic pathways and algorithms including CTPA or V/Q lung scan, which can be used safely during pregnancy.
(10)After acute PE, patients should not be lost to follow-up. Apart from checking for possible signs of VTE recurrence, cancer, or bleeding complications of anticoagulation, ask the patient if there is persisting or new-onset dyspnoea or functional limitation. If yes, implement a staged diagnostic workup to exclude CTEPH or chronic thromboembolic disease, and to detect/treat comorbidity or ‘simple’ deconditioning. Follow-up imaging is not routinely recommended in an asymptomatic patient, but it may be considered in patients with risk factors for development of CTEPH.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
13 Gaps in the evidence
Diagnosis
•The optimal method to adjust (based on the patient’s age or in combination with clinical probability) the D-dimer threshold, permitting the exclusion of PE while reducing the number of unnecessary imaging tests to a minimum, remains to be determined.
•The diagnostic value and clinical significance of isolated subsegmental contrast-filling defects in the modern CTPA era remain controversial.
•No robust data exist to guide the decision on whether to treat incidental PE with anticoagulants compared with a strategy of watchful waiting.
•For patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain, the benefits vs. risks of ‘triple rule-out’ (for coronary artery disease, PE, and aortic dissection) CT angiography need further evaluation before such an approach can be routinely recommended.
Assessment of pulmonary embolism severity and the risk of early death
•The optimal, clinically most relevant combination (and cut-off levels) of clinical and biochemical predictors of early PE-related death remain to be determined, particularly with regard to identifying possible candidates for reperfusion treatment among patients with intermediate-risk PE.
•The need for assessment of the RV status in addition to clinical parameters, to classify a patient with acute symptomatic PE as being at low vs. intermediate risk, needs to be confirmed by further prospective management (cohort) studies.
Treatment in the acute phase
•The clinical benefits vs. risks of reduced-dose thrombolysis and catheter-based reperfusion modalities in patients with intermedia- te-high-risk PE should be evaluated in prospective randomized trials.
•The place of ECMO in the management of acute high-risk PE awaits support by additional evidence from prospective management (cohort) studies.
•The optimal anticoagulant drug(s) and regimen in patients with renal insufficiency and CrCl <30 mL/min remain unclear.
•The criteria for selecting patients for early discharge and
outpatient treatment of PE, and particularly the need for assessment of the RV status with imaging methods and/or laboratory markers in addition to calculating a clinical score, need to be further validated in prospective cohort studies.
Chronic treatment and prevention of recurrence
•The clinical value and the possible therapeutic implications of models or scores assessing the risk of VTE recurrence, and the risk of bleeding under anticoagulation, need to be revisited in the NOAC era.
•The effectiveness of extended treatment with a reduced dose, or apixaban or rivaroxaban, should be confirmed in patients with a high risk of recurrent PE.
2019 September 13 on guest by 1093/eurheartj/ehz405/5556136.abstract/doi/10-article-com/eurheartj/advance.oup.https://academic from Downloaded
ESC Guidelines |
47 |
|
|
•The evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of NOACs for the treatment of PE in patients with cancer needs to be extended by further studies.
•In patients with cancer, the anticoagulant regimen and dose after the first 6 months should be clarified and prospectively tested.
•The optimal time for discontinuing anticoagulant treatment after an episode of acute PE in patients with cancer is yet to be determined.
Pulmonary embolism and pregnancy
•Diagnostic algorithms for PE in pregnancy, using modern radiological imaging techniques and low radiation doses, need to be prospectively tested in adequately powered cohort studies.
•Controversy persists on the optimal LMWH dose and regimen for the treatment of PE during pregnancy.
•NOACs are not allowed in pregnancy. However, if exposure to these drugs occurs during pregnancy despite this warning, any possible effects on the foetus should be recorded to provide
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
more precise information on the risks and complications of these drugs, and adapt the instructions to physicians in the future.
Long-term sequelae of pulmonary embolism
•The optimal follow-up strategy, including the spectrum of diagnostic tests that may be necessary, in patients with persisting symptoms and functional limitation after acute PE needs to be defined and prospectively validated.
•In the absence of persisting symptoms or functional limitation after acute PE, the criteria for identifying patients whose risk of developing CTEPH may be sufficiently high to justify further diagnostic workup require further elaboration and validation in prospective cohort studies.
14 ‘What to do’ and ‘what not to do’ messages from the Guidelines
|
Diagnosis |
Classa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In suspected high-risk PE, perform bedside echocardiography or emergency CTPA (depending on availability and clinical circumstan- |
I |
|
|
|
ces) for diagnosis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In suspected high-risk PE, initiate intravenous anticoagulation with UFH without delay, including a weight-adjusted bolus injection. |
I |
|
|
|
In suspected PE without haemodynamic instability, use validated diagnostic criteria. |
I |
|
|
|
In suspected PE without haemodynamic instability, initiate anticoagulation in case of high or intermediate clinical probability, while |
I |
|
|
|
diagnostic workup is in progress. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base the diagnostic strategy on clinical probability, using either clinical judgement or a validated prediction rule. |
I |
|
|
|
Measure D-dimers in plasma, preferably with a highly sensitive assay, in outpatients/emergency department patients with low or inter- |
I |
|
|
|
mediate clinical probability, or who are PE-unlikely. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reject the diagnosis of PE (without further testing) if CTPA is normal in a patient with low or intermediate clinical probability, or if |
I |
|
|
|
the patient is PE-unlikely. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reject the diagnosis of PE (without further testing) if the perfusion lung scan is normal. |
I |
|
|
|
Accept the diagnosis of PE if CTPA shows a segmental or more proximal filling defect in a patient with intermediate or high clinical |
I |
|
|
|
probability. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accept the diagnosis of VTE if CUS shows a proximal DVT in a patient with clinical suspicion of PE. |
I |
|
|
|
Do not measure D-dimers in patients with high clinical probability, as a normal result does not safely exclude PE. |
III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not perform CT venography as an adjunct to CTPA. |
III |
|
|
|
Do not perform MRA to rule out PE. |
III |
|
|
|
Risk assessment |
|
|
|
|
Stratify patients with suspected or confirmed PE, based on the presence of haemodynamic instability, to identify those at high risk of |
I |
|
|
|
early mortality. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In patients without haemodynamic instability, further stratify PE into intermediateand low-risk categories. |
I |
|
|
|
Treatment in the acute phase |
|
|
|
|
Administer systemic thrombolytic therapy to patients with high-risk PE. |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical pulmonary embolectomy for patients with high-risk PE, in whom recommended thrombolysis is contraindicated or has failed. |
I |
|
|
|
If anticoagulation is initiated parenterally in a patient without haemodynamic instability, prefer LMWH or fondaparinux over UFH. |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued
2019 September 13 on guest by 1093/eurheartj/ehz405/5556136.abstract/doi/10-article-com/eurheartj/advance.oup.https://academic from Downloaded
48 |
ESC Guidelines |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When oral anticoagulation is initiated in a patient with PE who is eligible for a NOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxa- |
|
I |
|
|
|
ban), prefer a NOAC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As an alternative to a NOAC, administer a VKA, overlapping with parenteral anticoagulation until an INR of 2.5 (range 2.0 3.0) has |
|
I |
|
|
|
been reached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administer rescue thrombolytic therapy to a patient with haemodynamic deterioration on anticoagulation treatment. |
|
I |
|
|
|
Do not use NOACs in patients with severe renal impairment or in those with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. |
|
III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not routinely administer systemic thrombolysis as primary treatment in patients with intermediateor low-risk PE. |
|
III |
|
|
|
Do not routinely use inferior vena cava filters. |
|
III |
|
|
|
Chronic treatment and prevention of recurrence |
|
|
|
|
|
Administer therapeutic anticoagulation for >3 months to all patients with PE. |
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinue therapeutic oral anticoagulation after 3 months in patients with first PE secondary to a major transient/reversible risk |
|
I |
|
|
|
factor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue oral anticoagulant treatment indefinitely in patients presenting with recurrent VTE (at least one previous episode of PE or |
|
I |
|
|
|
DVT) that is not related to a major transient or reversible risk factor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue oral anticoagulant treatment with a VKA indefinitely in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. |
|
I |
|
|
|
In patients who receive extended anticoagulation, reassess drug tolerance and adherence, hepatic and renal function, and the bleeding |
|
I |
|
|
|
risk at regular intervals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PE in pregnancy |
|
|
|
|
|
Perform formal diagnostic assessment with validated methods if PE is suspected during pregnancy or in the post-partum period. |
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administer therapeutic, fixed doses of LMWH, based on early pregnancy weight, in the majority of pregnant women without haemo- |
|
I |
|
|
|
dynamic instability. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not insert a spinal or epidural needle within 24 h since the last LMWH dose. |
|
III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not administer LMWH within 4 h of removal of an epidural catheter. |
|
III |
|
|
|
Do not use NOACs during pregnancy or lactation. |
|
III |
|
|
|
Post-PE care and long-term sequelae |
|
|
|
|
|
Routinely re-evaluate patients 3 6 months after acute PE. |
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement an integrated model of care after acute PE, in order to ensure optimal transition from hospital to ambulatory care. |
|
I |
|
|
|
Refer symptomatic patients with mismatched perfusion defects on V/Q lung scan beyond 3 months after acute PE to a pulmonary |
|
|
|
|
|
hypertension/CTEPH expert centre, taking into account the results of echocardiography, natriuretic peptide, and/or cardiopulmonary |
|
I |
|
|
|
exercise testing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CT = computed tomography; CTPA = computed tomographic pulmonary angiography/angiogram; CTEPH = Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; CUS = compression ultrasonography; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; INR = international normalized ratio; LMWH = low-molecular weight heparin; MRA = magnetic resonance angiography; NOAC(s) = non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant(s); PE = pulmonary embolism; UFH = unfractionated heparin; VKA = vitamin K antagonist; V/Q = ventilation/ perfusion (lung scintigraphy); VTE = venous thromboembolism.
aClass of recommendation.
15 Supplementary data
Supplementary Data with additional Web Supplementary Tables complementing the full text, as well as section 11 on non-thrombotic PE, are available on the European Heart Journal website and via the ESC website at www.escardio.org/guidelines.
16 Appendix
Author/Task Force Member Affiliations:
Cecilia Becattini, Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; He´ctor Bueno, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain; and Cardiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre & iþ12 Research Institute, Madrid, Spain; CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain; Geert-Jan Geersing, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; VeliPekka Harjola, Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Menno V. Huisman, Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Marc Humbert, Service de Pneumologie, Hoˆpital Bic^etre, Assistance Publique-Hoˆpitaux de Paris, Univ. Paris-Sud, Universite´ Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bic^etre, France; Catriona Sian Jennings, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; David Jime´nez, Respiratory Department, Ramon y Cajal Hospital and Alcala University, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain; Nils Kucher, Angiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Irene Marthe Lang, Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Mareike Lankeit, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite´ University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Clinic
2019 September 13 on guest by 1093/eurheartj/ehz405/5556136.abstract/doi/10-article-com/eurheartj/advance.oup.https://academic from Downloaded
ESC Guidelines |
49 |
of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Go¨ttingen, Go¨ttingen, Germany; Roberto Lorusso, Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, Netherlands; Lucia Mazzolai, Department of Angiology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland; Nicolas Meneveau, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz and EA3920, University of Franche-Comte´, Besanc¸on, France;
Fionnuala Nı Ainle, Haematology, Rotunda and Mater University Hospitals, Dublin, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Paolo Prandoni, Arianna Foundation on Anticoagulation, Bologna, Italy; Piotr Pruszczyk, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; Marc Righini, Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; Adam Torbicki, Department of Pulmonary Circulation, Thromboembolic Diseases and Cardiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, ECZ-Otwock, Poland; Eric Van Belle, Cardiology, Institut Coeur Poumon CHU de Lille and INSERM U1011 Lille, Lille, France; Jose´ Luis Zamorano, Cardiology, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG): Stephan Windecker (Chairperson) (Switzerland), Victor Aboyans (France), Colin Baigent (United Kingdom), Jean-Philippe Collet (France), Veronica Dean (France), Victoria Delgado (Netherlands), Donna Fitzsimons (United Kingdom), Chris P. Gale (United Kingdom), Diederick E. Grobbee (Netherlands), Sigrun Halvorsen (Norway), Gerhard Hindricks (Germany), Bernard Iung (France), Peter Ju¨ni (Canada), Hugo A. Katus (Germany), Ulf Landmesser (Germany), Christophe Leclercq (France), Maddalena Lettino (Italy), Basil S. Lewis (Israel), Bela Merkely (Hungary), Christian Mueller (Switzerland), Steffen E. Petersen (United Kingdom), Anna Sonia Petronio (Italy), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Marco Roffi (Switzerland), Evgeny Shlyakhto (Russian Federation), Iain A. Simpson (United Kingdom), Miguel Sousa-Uva (Portugal), Rhian M. Touyz (United Kingdom).
ESC National Cardiac Societies actively involved in the review process of the 2019 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism:
Algeria: Algerian Society of Cardiology, Naima Hammoudi; Armenia: Armenian Cardiologists Association, Hamlet Hayrapetyan; Austria: Austrian Society of Cardiology, Julia Mascherbauer; Azerbaijan: Azerbaijan Society of Cardiology, Firdovsi Ibrahimov; Belarus: Belorussian Scientific Society of Cardiologists, Oleg Polonetsky; Belgium: Belgian Society of Cardiology, Patrizio Lancellotti; Bulgaria: Bulgarian Society of Cardiology, Mariya Tokmakova; Croatia: Croatian Cardiac Society, Bosko Skoric; Cyprus: Cyprus Society of Cardiology, Ioannis Michaloliakos; Czech Republic: Czech Society of Cardiology, Martin Hutyra; Denmark: Danish Society of Cardiology, Søren Mellemkjaer; Egypt: Egyptian Society of Cardiology, Mansour Mostafa; Estonia: Estonian Society of Cardiology, Julia Reinmets; Finland: Finnish Cardiac Society, Pertti J€a€askel€ainen; France: French Society of Cardiology, Denis Angoulvant; Germany: German Cardiac Society, Johann Bauersachs; Greece: Hellenic
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Society of Cardiology, George Giannakoulas; Hungary: Hungarian Society of Cardiology, Endre Zima; Italy: Italian Federation of Cardiology, Carmine Dario Vizza; Kazakhstan: Association of Cardiologists of Kazakhstan, Akhmetzhan Sugraliyev; Kosovo (Republic of): Kosovo Society of Cardiology, Ibadete Bytyc¸i; Latvia: Latvian Society of Cardiology, Aija Maca; Lithuania: Lithuanian Society of Cardiology, Egle Ereminiene; Luxembourg: Luxembourg Society of Cardiology, Steve Huijnen; Malta: Maltese Cardiac Society, Robert Xuereb; Moldova (Republic of): Moldavian Society of Cardiology, Nadejda Diaconu; Montenegro: Montenegro Society of Cardiology, Nebojsa Bulatovic; Morocco: Moroccan Society of Cardiology, Ilyasse Asfalou; North Macedonia: North Macedonian Society of Cardiology, Marijan Bosevski; Norway: Norwegian Society of Cardiology, Sigrun Halvorsen; Poland: Polish Cardiac Society, Bozena Sobkowicz; Portugal: Portuguese Society of Cardiology, Daniel Ferreira; Romania: Romanian Society of Cardiology, Antoniu Octavian Petris; Russian Federation: Russian Society of Cardiology, Olga Moiseeva; San Marino: San Marino Society of Cardiology, Marco Zavatta; Serbia: Cardiology Society of Serbia, Slobodan Obradovic;
Slovakia: Slovak Society of Cardiology, Iveta Simkova; Slovenia: Slovenian Society of Cardiology, Peter Radsel; Spain: Spanish Society of Cardiology, Borja Ibanez; Sweden: Swedish Society of Cardiology, Gerhard Wikstro¨m; Switzerland: Swiss Society of Cardiology, Drahomir Aujesky; Turkey: Turkish Society of Cardiology, Cihangir Kaymaz; Ukraine: Ukrainian Association of Cardiology, Alexander Parkhomenko; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: British Cardiovascular Society, Joanna Pepke-Zaba.
17 References
1. Mazzolai L, Aboyans V, Ageno W, Agnelli G, Alatri A, Bauersachs R, Brekelmans MPA, Buller HR, Elias A, Farge D, Konstantinides S, Palareti G, Prandoni P, Righini M, Torbicki A, Vlachopoulos C, Brodmann M. Diagnosis and management of acute deep vein thrombosis: a joint consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology working groups of aorta and peripheral vascular diseases and pulmonary circulation and right ventricular function. Eur Heart J 2018;39:4208 4218.
2.Raskob GE, Angchaisuksiri P, Blanco AN, Buller H, Gallus A, Hunt BJ, Hylek EM, Kakkar A, Konstantinides SV, McCumber M, Ozaki Y, Wendelboe A, Weitz JI. Thrombosis: a major contributor to global disease burden. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014;34:2363 2371.
3.Wendelboe AM, Raskob GE. Global burden of thrombosis: epidemiologic aspects. Circ Res 2016;118:1340 1347.
4.Keller K, Hobohm L, Ebner M, Kresoja KP, Munzel T, Konstantinides SV, Lankeit M. Trends in thrombolytic treatment and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in Germany. Eur Heart J;doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz236. Published online ahead of print 18 May 2019.
5.de Miguel-Diez J, Jimenez-Garcia R, Jimenez D, Monreal M, Guijarro R, Otero R, Hernandez-Barrera V, Trujillo-Santos J, Lopez de Andres A, Carrasco-Garrido P. Trends in hospital admissions for pulmonary embolism in Spain from 2002 to 2011. Eur Respir J 2014;44:942 950.
6.Dentali F, Ageno W, Pomero F, Fenoglio L, Squizzato A, Bonzini M. Time trends and case fatality rate of in-hospital treated pulmonary embolism during 11 years of observation in Northwestern Italy. Thromb Haemost 2016;115:399 405.
7.Lehnert P, Lange T, Moller CH, Olsen PS, Carlsen J. Acute pulmonary embolism in a national Danish cohort: increasing incidence and decreasing mortality. Thromb Haemost 2018;118:539 546.
8.Barco S, Woersching AL, Spyropoulos AC, Piovella F, Mahan CE. European Union-28: an annualised cost-of-illness model for venous thromboembolism.
Thromb Haemost 2016;115:800 808.
9.Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA, Arcelus JI, Bergqvist D, Brecht JG, Greer IA, Heit JA, Hutchinson JL, Kakkar AK, Mottier D, Oger E, Samama MM, Spannagl M; VTE Impact Assessment Group in Europe (VITAE). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost 2007;98:756 764.
2019 September 13 on guest by 1093/eurheartj/ehz405/5556136.abstract/doi/10-article-com/eurheartj/advance.oup.https://academic from Downloaded
50 |
ESC Guidelines |
10.Jimenez D, de Miguel-Diez J, Guijarro R, Trujillo-Santos J, Otero R, Barba R, Muriel A, Meyer G, Yusen RD, Monreal M; RIETE Investigators. Trends in the management and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism: analysis from the RIETE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:162 170.
11.Agarwal S, Clark D III, Sud K, Jaber WA, Cho L, Menon V. Gender disparities in outcomes and resource utilization for acute pulmonary embolism hospitalizations in the United States. Am J Cardiol 2015;116:1270 1276.
12.Roy PM, Meyer G, Vielle B, Le Gall C, Verschuren F, Carpentier F, Leveau P, Furber A; EMDEPU Study Group. Appropriateness of diagnostic management and outcomes of suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:157 164.
13.Jimenez D, Bikdeli B, Barrios D, Morillo R, Nieto R, Guerassimova I, Muriel A, Jara-Palomares L, Moores L, Tapson V, Yusen RD, Monreal M; RIETE Investigators. Management appropriateness and outcomes of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 2018;51:1800445.
14.Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:831 837.
15.Shiraev TP, Omari A, Rushworth RL. Trends in pulmonary embolism morbidity and mortality in Australia. Thromb Res 2013;132:19 25.
16.Tsai J, Grosse SD, Grant AM, Hooper WC, Atrash HK. Trends in in-hospital deaths among hospitalizations with pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:960 961.
17.Yang Y, Liang L, Zhai Z, He H, Xie W, Peng X, Wang C; Investigators for National Cooperative Project for Prevention and Treatment of PTE-DVT. Pulmonary embolism incidence and fatality trends in chinese hospitals from 1997 to 2008: a multicenter registration study. PLoS One 2011;6:e26861.
18.Konstantinides SV, Barco S, Lankeit M, Meyer G. Management of pulmonary embolism: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:976 990.
19.Biss TT, Brandao LR, Kahr WH, Chan AK, Williams S. Clinical features and outcome of pulmonary embolism in children. Br J Haematol 2008;142:808 818.
20.Andrew M, David M, Adams M, Ali K, Anderson R, Barnard D, Bernstein M, Brisson L, Cairney B, DeSai D. Venous thromboembolic complications (VTE) in children: first analyses of the Canadian Registry of VTE. Blood 1994;83:1251 1257.
21.Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in infants and children: data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. J Pediatr 2004;145:563 565.
22.van Ommen CH, Heijboer H, Buller HR, Hirasing RA, Heijmans HS, Peters M. Venous thromboembolism in childhood: a prospective two-year registry in The Netherlands. J Pediatr 2001;139:676 681.
23.Rogers MA, Levine DA, Blumberg N, Flanders SA, Chopra V, Langa KM. Triggers of hospitalization for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2012;125:2092 2099.
24.Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003;107:I9 I16.
25.Ku GH, White RH, Chew HK, Harvey DJ, Zhou H, Wun T. Venous thromboembolism in patients with acute leukemia: incidence, risk factors, and effect on survival. Blood 2009;113:3911 3917.
26.Chew HK, Wun T, Harvey D, Zhou H, White RH. Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with common cancers.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:458 464.
27.Timp JF, Braekkan SK, Versteeg HH, Cannegieter SC. Epidemiology of cancerassociated venous thrombosis. Blood 2013;122:1712 1723.
28.Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR. Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 2005;293:715 722.
29.Gussoni G, Frasson S, La Regina M, Di Micco P, Monreal M; RIETE Investigators. Three-month mortality rate and clinical predictors in patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer. Findings from the RIETE registry. Thromb Res 2013;131:24 30.
30.Blanco-Molina A, Rota L, Di Micco P, Brenner B, Trujillo-Santos J, Ruiz-Gamietea A, Monreal M; RIETE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy, postpartum or during contraceptive use. Thromb Haemost 2010;103:306 311.
31.Blanco-Molina A, Trujillo-Santos J, Tirado R, Canas I, Riera A, Valdes M, Monreal M; RIETE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism in women using hormonal contraceptives. Findings from the RIETE Registry. Thromb Haemost 2009;101:478 482.
32.van Hylckama Vlieg A, Middeldorp S. Hormone therapies and venous thromboembolism: where are we now? J Thromb Haemost 2011;9:257 266.
33.Lidegaard Ø, Nielsen LH, Skovlund CW, Skjeldestad FE, Løkkegaard E. Risk of venous thromboembolism from use of oral contraceptives containing different progestogens and oestrogen doses: Danish cohort study, 2001-9. BMJ 2011;343:d6423.
34.de Bastos M, Stegeman BH, Rosendaal FR, Van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Stijnen T, Dekkers OM. Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;3:CD010813.
35.van Vlijmen EF, Wiewel-Verschueren S, Monster TB, Meijer K. Combined oral contraceptives, thrombophilia and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2016;14:1393 1403.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
36.Tricotel A, Collin C, Zureik M. Impact of the sharp changes in the use of contraception in 2013 on the risk of pulmonary embolism in France. J Thromb Haemost 2015;13:1576 1580.
37.Kemmeren JM, Algra A, Grobbee DE. Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis. BMJ 2001;323:131 134.
38.van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Rosendaal FR. The risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with injectable depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptives or a levonorgestrel intrauterine device. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010;30:2297 2300.
39.Sweetland S, Beral V, Balkwill A, Liu B, Benson VS, Canonico M, Green J, Reeves GK; Million Women Study Collaborators. Venous thromboembolism risk in relation to use of different types of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a large prospective study. J Thromb Haemost 2012;10:2277 2286.
40.Clayton TC, Gaskin M, Meade TW. Recent respiratory infection and risk of venous thromboembolism: case-control study through a general practice database. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:819 827.
41.Smeeth L, Cook C, Thomas S, Hall AJ, Hubbard R, Vallance P. Risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after acute infection in a community setting. Lancet 2006;367:1075 1079.
42.Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Culakova E, Lyman GH, Francis CW. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood 2008;111:4902 4907.
43.Dijk FN, Curtin J, Lord D, Fitzgerald DA. Pulmonary embolism in children.
Paediatr Respir Rev 2012;13:112 122.
44.Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Venous thromboembolism and atherothrombosis: an integrated approach. Circulation 2010;121:2146 2150.
45.Steffen LM, Cushman M, Peacock JM, Heckbert SR, Jacobs DR Jr, Rosamond WD, Folsom AR. Metabolic syndrome and risk of venous thromboembolism: longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:746 751.
46.Severinsen MT, Kristensen SR, Johnsen SP, Dethlefsen C, Tjonneland A, Overvad
K.Anthropometry, body fat, and venous thromboembolism: a Danish follow-up study. Circulation 2009;120:1850 1857.
47.Ageno W, Becattini C, Brighton T, Selby R, Kamphuisen PW. Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2008;117:93 102.
48.Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ, Lessard DM, Goldberg RJ, Emery C, Spencer FA. Venous thromboembolism in patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis. Thromb Haemost 2011;106:1095 1102.
49.Montecucco F, Mach F. Should we focus on "venous vulnerability" instead of "plaque vulnerability" in symptomatic atherosclerotic patients? Thromb Haemost 2011;106:995 996.
50.Gresele P, Momi S, Migliacci R. Endothelium, venous thromboembolism and ischaemic cardiovascular events. Thromb Haemost 2010;103:56 61.
51.Fox EA, Kahn SR. The relationship between inflammation and venous thrombosis
-A systematic review of clinical studies. Thromb Haemost 2005;94:362 365.
52.Wattanakit K, Lutsey PL, Bell EJ, Gornik H, Cushman M, Heckbert SR, Rosamond WD, Folsom AR. Association between cardiovascular disease risk factors and occurrence of venous thromboembolism. A time-dependent analysis.
Thromb Haemost 2012;108:508 515.
53.Enga KF, Braekkan SK, Hansen-Krone IJ, le Cessie S, Rosendaal FR, Hansen JB. Cigarette smoking and the risk of venous thromboembolism: the Tromsø Study.
JThromb Haemost 2012;10:2068 2074.
54.Sorensen HT, Horvath-Puho E, Lash TL, Christiansen CF, Pesavento R, Pedersen L, Baron JA, Prandoni P. Heart disease may be a risk factor for pulmonary embolism without peripheral deep venous thrombosis. Circulation 2011;124:1435 1441.
55.Prandoni P, Pesavento R, Sorensen HT, Gennaro N, Dalla Valle F, Minotto I, Perina F, Pengo V, Pagnan A. Prevalence of heart diseases in patients with pulmonary embolism with and without peripheral venous thrombosis: findings from a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Intern Med 2009;20:470 473.
56.Sorensen HT, Horvath-Puho E, Pedersen L, Baron JA, Prandoni P. Venous thromboembolism and subsequent hospitalisation due to acute arterial cardiovascular events: a 20-year cohort study. Lancet 2007;370:1773 1779.
57.McIntyre KM, Sasahara AA. The hemodynamic response to pulmonary embolism in patients without prior cardiopulmonary disease. Am J Cardiol 1971;28:288 294.
58.Smulders YM. Pathophysiology and treatment of haemodynamic instability in acute pulmonary embolism: the pivotal role of pulmonary vasoconstriction.
Cardiovasc Res 2000;48:23 33.
59.Lankhaar JW, Westerhof N, Faes TJC, Marques KMJ, Marcus JT, Postmus PE, Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Quantification of right ventricular afterload in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;291:H1731 H1737.
60.Marcus JT, Gan CT, Zwanenburg JJ, Boonstra A, Allaart CP, Gotte MJ, VonkNoordegraaf A. Interventricular mechanical asynchrony in pulmonary arterial hypertension: left-to-right delay in peak shortening is related to right ventricular overload and left ventricular underfilling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:750 757.
2019 September 13 on guest by 1093/eurheartj/ehz405/5556136.abstract/doi/10-article-com/eurheartj/advance.oup.https://academic from Downloaded