MIL-STD-202G
NUMERICAL INDEX OF TEST METHODS
Test Method |
|
Date |
|
Title |
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental tests (100 class) |
|
|
101E |
|
February 2002 |
|
Salt atmosphere (corrosion) |
(formerly called salt spray) |
8 |
|
||||
102A |
Cancelled |
|
Superseded by Method 107 |
(see note on Method 102) |
|
103B |
12 |
September 1963 |
|
Humidity (steady state) |
|
104A |
24 |
October 1956 |
|
Immersion |
|
105C |
12 |
September 1963 |
|
Barometric pressure (reduced) |
|
106G |
8 |
February 2002 |
|
Moisture resistance |
|
107G |
28 |
March 1984 |
|
Thermal shock |
|
108A |
12 |
September 1963 |
|
Life (at elevated ambient temperature) |
|
109C |
8 |
February 2002 |
|
Explosion |
|
110A |
16 |
April 1973 |
|
Sand and dust |
|
111A |
16 |
April 1973 |
|
Flammability (external flame) |
|
112E |
11 |
October 1988 |
|
Seal |
|
|
|
Physical characteristics tests (200 class) |
|
||
201A |
|
October 1956 |
|
Vibration |
|
24 |
|
|
|||
202D |
Cancelled |
|
Superseded by Method 213 |
(see note on Method 202) |
|
203C |
8 |
February 2002 |
|
Random drop |
|
204D |
1 |
April 1980 |
|
Vibration, high frequency |
|
205E |
Cancelled |
|
Superseded by Method 213 |
(see note on Method 205) |
|
206 |
12 |
September 1963 |
|
Life (rotational) |
|
207B |
8 |
February 2002 |
|
High-impact shock |
|
208H |
31 |
January 1996 |
|
Solderability |
|
209 |
18 |
May 1962 |
|
Radiographic inspection |
|
210F |
8 |
February 2002 |
|
Resistance to soldering heat |
|
211A |
14 |
April 1969 |
|
Terminal strength |
|
212A |
16 |
April 1973 |
|
Acceleration |
|
213B |
16 |
April 1973 |
|
Shock (specified pulse) |
|
214A |
28 |
March 1984 |
|
Random vibration |
|
215K |
8 |
February 2002 |
|
Resistance to solvents |
|
216 |
Cancelled |
|
Superseded by Method 210 |
(see note on Method 216) |
|
217A |
8 |
February 2002 |
|
Particle impact noise detection (PIND) |
|
|
|
Electrical characteristics tests (300 class) |
|
||
301 |
|
February 1956 |
|
Dielectric withstanding voltage |
|
6 |
|
|
|||
302 |
6 |
February 1956 |
|
Insulation resistance |
|
303 |
6 |
February 1956 |
|
DC resistance |
|
304 |
24 |
October 1956 |
|
Resistance temperature characteristic |
|
305 |
24 |
October 1956 |
|
Capacitance |
|
306 |
24 |
October 1956 |
|
Quality factor (Q) |
|
307 |
24 |
October 1956 |
|
Contact resistance |
|
308 |
29 |
November 1961 |
|
Current-noise test for fixed resistors |
|
309 |
27 |
May 1965 |
|
Voltage coefficient of resistance determination procedure |
|
310 |
20 |
January 1967 |
|
Contact-chatter monitoring |
|
311 |
14 |
April 1969 |
|
Life, low level switching |
|
312 |
16 |
April 1973 |
|
Intermediate current switching |
|
7
MIL-STD-202G
CLASS 100
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS
MIL-STD-202G
METHOD 101E
SALT ATMOSPHERE (CORROSION)
(formerly Salt Spray (Corrosion))
1.PURPOSE. The salt-spray test, in which specimens are subjected to a fine mist of salt solution, has several useful purposes when utilized with full recognition of its deficiencies and limitations. Originally proposed as an accelerated laboratory corrosion test simulating the effects of seacoast atmospheres on metals, with or without protective coatings, this test has been erroneously considered by many as an all-purpose accelerated corrosion test, which if "withstood successfully" will guarantee that metals or protective coatings will prove satisfactory under any corrosive condition. Experience has since shown that there is seldom a direct relationship between resistance to salt atmosphere corrosion and resistance to corrosion in other media, even in so-called "marine" atmospheres and seawater. However, some idea of the relative service life and behavior of different samples of the same (or closely related) metals or of protective coating-base metal combinations in marine and exposed seacoast locations can be gained by means of the salt atmosphere test, provided accumulated data from correlated field service tests and laboratory salt atmosphere tests show that such a relationship does exist, as in the case of aluminum alloys. (Such correlation tests are also necessary to show the degree of acceleration, if any, produced by the laboratory test). The salt atmosphere test is generally considered unreliable for comparing the general corrosion resistance of different kinds of metals or coating-metal combinations, or for predicting their comparative service life. The salt atmosphere test has received its widest acceptance as a test for evaluating the uniformity (specifically, thickness and degree of porosity) of protective coatings, metallic and nonmetallic, and has served this purpose with varying amounts of success. In this connection, the test is useful for evaluating different lots of the same product, once some standard level of performance has been established. The salt atmosphere test is especially helpful as a screening test for revealing particularly inferior coatings. When used to check the porosity of metallic coatings, the test is more dependable when applied to coatings that are cathodic rather than anodic toward the basic metal. This test can also be used to detect the presence of free iron contaminating the surface of another metal, by inspection of the corrosion products.
2.APPARATUS. Apparatus used in the salt atmosphere test shall include the following:
a.Exposure chamber with racks or fixtures for supporting specimens.
b.Salt-solution reservoir with means for monitoring an adequate level of solution.
c.Means for atomizing the salt solution, including suitable nozzles and compressed air supply.
d.Chamber-heating means and controls.
e.Means for humidifying the air at a temperature above the chamber temperature.
2.1 Chamber. The chamber and all accessories shall be made of material that will not affect the corrosiveness of the salt atmosphere, such as glass, hard rubber, or plastic. All parts of the test setup that come in contact with test specimens shall be of materials that will not cause electrolytic corrosion. The chamber and accessories shall be so constructed and arranged that there is no direct impinging of the spray or dripping of the condensate on the specimens, so that the atmosphere circulates freely about all specimens to the same degree, and so that no liquid which has come in contact with the test specimens returns to the salt-solution reservoir. The chamber shall be properly vented to prevent pressure build up and allow uniform distribution of salt spray. The chamber shall have a suitable means of heating and maintaining the required test temperature.
2.2 Salt solution reservoir. The salt solution reservoir shall be made of material that is non-reactive with the salt solution, e.g., glass, hard rubber, or plastic. The reservoir shall be adequately protected from the surrounding environment and shall have a means to monitor the solution level. The reservoir shall include a means to filter the salt solution in the supply line to the atomizers. When long duration test conditions are specified (e.g. test condition D), the reservoir may be refilled via auxiliary reservoirs so that the test cycle shall not be interrupted.
METHOD 101E
8 February 2002
1 of 4