3. Zinchenko G.P. Predposylki stanovleniya teorii nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya [Background of the theory of continuing education]. Sovetskayapedagogika [Sovietpedagogy], 1991, no. 1, pp. 18-24. (In Russ.).
4. Kazakova A.G. Sovremennye pedagogicheskie tekhnologii v dopolnitel'nom professional'nom obrazovanii prepo- davateley: avtoref. dis. d-ra ped. nauk [Modern pedagogical technologies in the additional professional education of teachers. Author's abstract of diss. Dr. of Pedagogical Sciences]. Moscow, 2004. 51 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kalinnikova N.G. Nepreryvnoe pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie kak paradigma [Continuing teacher education as a par-adigm]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2005, no. 3, pp. 186-189. (In Russ.).
6. Kashtanov V.V. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie vo Frantsii. Perspektivy razvitiya sistemy narodnogo obrazovaniya [Continuing education in France. Prospects for the development of continuing education]. Moscow, APN SSR Publ., 1987, 161 p. (In Russ.).
7. Kuznetsova Yu.L. Gumanisticheskie pedagogicheskie tekhnologii v vuzakh SSHA: Vtoraya polovina XX veka: dis. kand. ped. nauk [Humanistic pedagogical technologies in US universities: The second half of the XX century. Diss. PhD in pedagogy]. Kazan, 2004. 213 p. (In Russ.).
8. Fedorov V.A. Professional'no-pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie: teoriya, empirika, praktika [Professional and peda-gogical education: theory, empiricism, practice]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Vocational Pedagogical University Publ., 2001. 330 p. (In Russ.).
9. Avram C., Larrivee P Training Foreign and Second Language Teachers: European Challenges, Successes and Perspectives. Cambridge, Cambridge Scholars Publ., 2016. 198 p. (In Eng.).
10. Beer R. Bildungsstandards: Einstellungen von Lehrerinnen undLehrern. Vienna, LIT Publ., 2007. 154 p. (In Germ.).
11. Blomeke S. Erwerb professioneller Kompetenz in der Lehrerausbildung und die Aufgabe von Zentren von Lehrerbil-dung. Folgerungen aus einer Theorie universitarer Lehrerausbildung'. Seibert N., ed. Probleme der Lehrerbildung: Analysen, Positionen, Losungsversuche. Bad Heilbrunn, Klinkhardt Publ., 2001. 131 p. (In Germ.).
12. Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006. 264 p. (In Eng.).
13. DESI-Konsortium. Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch undEnglisch. DESI-Ergebnisse Band 2. Weinheim, Beltz Padagogik Publ., 2008. 459 p. (In Germ.).
14. Foure E. Learning to be. Paris, UNESCO Publ., 1972. 314 p. (In Eng.).
15. Greiner L. Effekt gleich null. Der Spiegel, 2009, no. 4, pp. 4-43. (In Germ.).
16. Grimm N., Meyer M., Volkmann L. Teaching English. Tubingen, Narr Francke Attempto Publ., 2015. 198 p. (In Eng.).
17. Legutke M., Muller-Hartmann A., Schocker M. Teaching English in the primary school. Stuttgart, Klett Publ., 2009. 293 p. (In Eng.).
18. Piepho H.E. Kommunikative Kompetenz als ubergeordnetes Lernziel im Englischunterricht der Sekundarstufe I. Dornburg-Frickhofen, Frankonius Publ., 1974. 199 p. (In Germ.).