Поэтому, оставляя позади Южную Африку, богатство зарегистрированных данных по Евразии может открыть больше пластов исторического материала, достигая средних веков и идя дальше к древним цивилизациям и Бронзовому веку. Прекрасный фон для глубоких исследований -- постоянный контраст между оседлыми и кочевыми племенами степной фронтирной зоны с характерными для них социоэкономической динамикой и кросс-культурными отношениями, их взаимозависимостью, вторжениями и подарками, что хорошо зафиксировано византийскими, древнеславянскими, персидскими и китайскими источниками со времен Хунну. Ясно, что появление сил метрополии во Внутренней Азии вряд ли можно объяснить не учитывая диалектику этих отношений и имперского стремления преодолеть их. Это обычный стереотип, что «антропологи полны предложений генеральных идей, но игнорируют детали». Однако, имея возможность рассмотреть длительную временную перспективу Евразии, к тому же в динамике, историческая антропология может добраться до «дна» и совместить интересы социокультурной антропологии с «национальной этнографией» и «глобальной историей», вышли ли они из под эволюционистского или диффузионистского пера. При этом созидаются отличные линзы, взирая сквозь которые мы явно можем улучшить наше понимание мировых цивилизаций.
Однако если держать в голове эти его особенности и использовать со всей осторожностью, то термин -- полезный инструмент для восприятия трансконтинентальных процессов. О терми¬нологических сложностях и кратко о дискуссии см.: Golden P B. War and Warfare in the Pre-Cinggisid Western Steppes of Eurasia // Warfare in Inner Asian History (500-1800). Vol. 6: Handbook of Oriental Studies, Section 8. Leiden. P. 105-172.
С этим, как мне кажется, необходимым дифференцированием согласны далеко не все из мо¬их коллег. Крис Ханн, например, неоднократно выступал за «максимальный» вариант, говоря про Евразию как «континентальный массив» (Eurasian landmass) и «суперконтинент», хотя его критики не устают отмечать поверхностность такового толкования. См.: Hann Ch.: 1) Towards a Maximally Inclusive Concept of Eurasia (Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology Working Paper, vol. 157). Halle/ Saale: Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology, 2014. P. 2; 2) A Concept of Eurasia // Current Anthropol¬ogy. 2016. Vol. 57, no. 1. P. 1-27. -- Ср.: Testa A. A Utopia of Eurasia: the Uses and Abuses of a Concept -- a counter-reply to Chris Hann // Anthropology of East Europe Review. 2017. Vol. 35, no. 1. P. 64-79. -- См. также статью в сборнике в честь юбилея В. А. Тишкова, где Ханн предлагает «Евразийский Союз» от «Атлантического до Тихого океана», столица которого видится ему в России: Ханн К. Пределы конструктивизма в теории этничности: раздумья по поводу «Четвертой Руси» и «Второй Германии» // Антропология социальных перемен: сб. статей к 70-летию В. А. Тишкова / отв. ред. Э.-Б. Гучинова, Г. Комарова. М., 2011. С. 127.
References
1. Alekseeva E. P., Kalmykov I. Х., Nevskaia V. P. Voluntary accession of Cherkessia to Russia: for the 400th anniversary. Cherkessk, Karachaevo-Cherkesskii nauchno-issledovatelskii institut istorii, iazyka i literatury publ., 1957, 92 p. (In Russian)
2. Austin M., Vidal-Naquet P Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft im alten Griechenland. Mьnchen, Beck Verlag, 1984, 344 p.
3. Axel B. K. Introduction: Historical Anthropology and its Vicissitudes. From the Margins: Historical Anthropology and its Futures. Ed. by B. K. Axel, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2002, pp. 1-44.
4. Baberowski J. Auf der Suche nach Eindeutigkeit: Kolonialismus und zivilisatorische Mission in Zarenreich und in der Sowjetunion. Jahrbьcher fьr Geschichte Osteuropas, vol. 47, no. 4, 1999, ss. 482-504.
5. Balzer M. M. The Tenacity of Ethnicity: A Siberian Saga in Global Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 203-226.
6. Barfield Th. J. The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992, 325 p.
7. Battaglia D. On Practical Nostalgia: Self-Prospecting among Urban Trobrianders. Rhetorics of Self-Making. Ed. by D. Battaglia. Berkeley CA, University of California Press, 1995, pp. 77-96.
8. Baumann H. Etnologische Fieldforschung und kulturhistorische Ethnologie. Historische Vцlkerkunde. Ed. by C. A. Schmity. Akademische Veglags-Gesellshaft, Frankfurt am Main, 1967, ss. 147-172.
9. Bayly Ch. A. Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988, 248 p.
10. Bayly S. Imaging `Greater India': French and Indian visions of colonialism in the Indic mode. Modern Asian Studies, vol. 38, no. 3, 2004, pp. 703-744.
11. Beller-Hann I. Community Matters in Xinjiang, 1880-1949. Towards a Historical Anthropology of the Uyghur. China Studies, vol. 17, Leiden, Brill Publishers, 2008, 477 p.
12. Benda-Beckmann F., Benda-Beckmann K. The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders. Dynamics of Plural Legal Orders. Ed. by E. von Benda-Beckmann, K. von Benda-Beckmann. Mьnster, LIT Verlag, 2006, pp. 53-54.
13. Bhattacharya S. India-Myanmar Relations: 1886-1948. Kolkata, K. P Bagchi, 2007. 438 p.
14. Bloch M. The Ethnohistory of Madagascar. Ethnohistory, 2001, vol. 48, no. 1-2, pp. 294-295.
15. Burbank J. The Rights of Difference: Law and Citizenship in the Russian Empire. Imperial Formations. Ed by A. L. Stoler, C. McGranahan, P C. Perdue. Santa Fe, School for Advanced Research Press, 2007, pp. 77-111.
16. Buzin V. S. On the Nation and Nationalism. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2018, vol. 63, iss. 1, pp. 311-324. (In Russian)
17. Cohn B. S. An Anthropologist among the Historians and Others Essays. Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1987,
18. pp. 1-17.
19. Comaroff J., Comaroff J. The End of History, Again? Pursuing the Past in the Postcolony. Postcolonial Studies and Beyond. Ed. by A. Loomba, S. Kaul, M. Bunzl, A. Burton, J. Esty. Durham, NC: Duke Univerrsity Press, 2005, pp. 125-144.
20. Comaroff J. Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992, 337 p.
21. Cooper F. Postcolonial Studies and the Study of History. Postcolonial Studies and Beyond. Ed. by A. Loomba, S. Kaul, M. Bunzl, J. Esty. Durham, London, Duke University Press, 2005, pp. 401-422.
22. Darnton R. The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History. New York, Vintage Books, 1985, 298 p.
23. Dirks N. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001, 386 p.
24. Dirks N. The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, 458 p.
25. Dordzhieva G. Sh. The social roots of Lamaism and the main milestones of its distribution among the Oirats and Kalmyks. Lamaizm v Kalmykii. Ed. by V. Darbakova. Elista, Kalmytskii nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut iazyka, literatury i istorii, 1977, pp. 5-13. (In Russian)
26. Dumont L. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and its Implications. Chicago, Universiity of Chicago Press, 1980, 488 p.
27. Dzhamgerchinov B. D. Kyrgyzstan's accession to Russia. Moscow, Izd-vo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi literatury, 1959, 435 p. (In Russian)
28. Eggan F. Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist, vol. 56, 1954, pp. 743-763.
29. Elfimov A. The state of the discipline in Russia: Interviews with Russian anthropologists. American Anthropologist, 1997, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 775-783.
30. Erdniev U. E. Voluntary entry of the Kalmyk people into Russia: Historical roots and significance. Elista, Kalmytskii gosudarstvennyi universitet publ., 1985, 186 p. (In Russian)
31. Evans-Pritchard E. E. Social anthropology: Past and present. Man, 1950, vol. 50, no. 198, pp. 118-124.
32. Gallinat A. Intense paradoxes of memory: researching moral questions about remembering the socialist past. Yistory and Anthropology, 2009, vol 20, no. 2, pp. 183-199.
33. Gerasimova K. M. Lamaism and the national-colonial policy of tsarism in Transbaikalia in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Ulan-Ude, Buriat-mongol'skii nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut kul'tury, 1957, 160 p. (In Russian)
34. Giersch C. P A Motley Throng': social change on Southwest China's early modern frontier, 1700-1880. The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 60, no 1, 2001, pp. 67-94.
35. Giordano Ch. The Past in the Present: Actualized History in the Social Construction of Reality. Critical Junctions: Anthropology and History Beyond the Cultural Turn. Ed. by D. Kalb, H. Tak. New York, Berghahn Books, 2005, pp. 53-71.
36. Girchenko V. P A page from the history of the Christianization of the Buryat population at the end of the 19th century: based on unpublished archival materials. Zhizn Buriatii, 1926, no 1, pp. 98-107. (In Russian)
37. Girchenko V P Khorinsky “incident” of 1848-1849 years and the Orthodox mission: a historical essay. Zhizn Buriatii, 1929, vol. 1, pp. 119-124. (In Russian)
38. Gingrich A., Zips W Ethnohistorie und Historische Anthropologie. Ethnologie. Einfьhrung und Ьberblick. Ed. by B. Baer, H. Fisher. Berlin, Reimer Verlag, 2003, 443 s.
39. Gingrich A., Haas S., Paleczek G., Fillitz Th. (eds.), Studies in Oriental Culture and History: Festschrift for Walter Dostal. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang Verlag, 1993, 287 p.
40. Gladney D. C. Relational alternity: Constructing Dungan (Hui), Uygur, and Kazakh identities across China, Central Asia and Turkey. History and Anthropology, 1996, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 445-477.
41. Gцckenjan H., Zimonzi I. Orientalische Berichte ьder die Vцlker Osteuropas und Zentralasiens im Mittelalter. Die Gayhani-Tradition (Ibn Rusta Gardizi, Hudud al-Alam, al-Bakri und al-Marwazi) Verцffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica, bd. 54, Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz, 2001, 342 s.
42. Golden P B. War and Warfare in the Pre-Cinggisid Western Steppes of Eurasia. Warfare in Inner Asian History (500-1800) (Handbook of Oriental Studies, Section 8, vol. 6). Ed. by N. Di Cosmo. Leiden, Brill, pp. 105-172.
43. Goody J. Production and Reproduction: A Comparitive Study of the Domestic Domain. Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology, vol. 17, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, 157 p.
44. Graebner F. Methode der Ethnologie. Kulturgeschichtliche Bibliothek, Reihe I; Ethnologische Bibliothek, vol. 1, Heidelberg, Verlag Winter, 1911, 264 s.
45. Hann Ch. Anthropology's Multiple Temporalities and its Future in Central and Eastern Europe: A Debate. Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology Working Paper, vol. 90. Ed. by Ch. Han. Halle (Saale), Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology, 2007, pp. 1-11.
46. Hann Ch. Towards a Maximally Inclusive Concept of Eurasia. Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology Working Paper, 157. Halle (Saale), Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology, 2014.
47. Hann Ch. A Concept of Eurasia. Current Anthropology, 2016, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1-27.
48. Hayit B. Some reflections on the subject of annexation of Turkestani Kazakhstan by Russia. Central Asian Survey, 1984, vol. 3-4, pp. 61-75.
49. Hechter M. Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development. New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers, 1999, 360 p.
50. Hirsch E., Stewart Ch. Introduction: Etnographies of historicity. History and Anthropology, 2005, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 261-274.
51. Humphrey C. Some recent developments in ethnography in the USSR. Man, n.s., 1984, vol. 19, pp. 310-320.
52. Humpreys S. C. The historical anthropology of thought: Jan-Pierre Vernant and intellectual innovation in ancient Greece. Focaal -- European Journal of Anthropology, 2009, vol. 55, pp. 101-112.
53. Kalb D., Tak H. Introduction: Critical Junctions Recapturing Anthropology and History. Critical Junctons: Anthropology and History Beyond the Cultural Turn. Ed. by D. Kalb, H. Tak. New York, Oxford, Berghahn Books, 2005, pp. 1-27.
54. Kalb D. The Path to the Post-Colony: Why Folklore Won't Save Us. Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology Working Paper, vol. 90. Ed. by Ch. Han. Halle (Saale), Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology, 2007, pp. 22-28.
55. Khodarkovsky M. Between Europe and Asia: Russia's State Colonialism in Comparative Perspective, 15501900. Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 2018, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1-29.
56. Khodarkovsky M. Russia's Steppe Frontier. The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500-1800. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press, 2002, 305 p.
57. Khodarkovsky M. Where Two Worlds Met: The Russian State and the Kalmyk Nomads, 1600-1771. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1992, 278 p.
58. Koppers W Der historishe Gedanke in Ethologie und Prдhistorie. Kultur und Sprache. Wiener Beitrдge zur Kulturgeschichte und Linguistik, vol. 9. Ed. by W Koppers, R. Heine-Geldern, J. Haekel. Wien, Herold Verlag, 1952, ss. 11-65.
59. Koppers W Der historische Grundcharakter der Vцlkerkunde. Studium Generale, 1954, vol. 7, ss. 135-143.
60. Kosmarski A. Space, power, and prestige in the academic field: A case-study of Russian scholars. Focaal -- European Lournal of Anthropology, 2009, vol. 53, pp. 89-102.
61. Kozhanovsky A., Kozhanovskaya I., Perepeolkin L., Pershitz A., Stelmach V, Tertizky, K. On Tishkov's “U. S. And Russian anthropology. Current Anthropology, 1999, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 525-528.
62. Krader L. Recent Trends in Soviet Anthropology. Biennial Review of Anthropology. Ed. by B. J. Siegal. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1959, pp. 155-184.
63. Kramer F. W Vita activa: Lawrence Krader. Dialectik: Enzyklopдdische Zeitschrift fьr Philophie und Wissenshaften, vol. 2. Ed. by H. J. Sandkьhler. Hamburg, Meiner Verlag, 1991, ss. 145-152.
64. Kroeber A. L. History and science in anthropology. American Anthropologist, 1935, vol. 37, pp. 539-569.
65. Kudriavtsev P Page from the history of forced baptism of Buryats. Zhizn Buriatii, 1929, vol. 6, pp. 63-66. (In Russian)
66. Ladwig P Schools, Ritual Economies, and the Expanding State: the Changing Roles of Lao Buddhist Monks as `traditional intellectuals'. Buddhism, Modernity, and the State in Asia: Forms of Engagement. Ed. by J. Whalen-Bridge, P Kitiarsa. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, pp. 63-91.
67. Latipov R. F. Reliable outpost of Russia: Voluntary entry of Bashkiria into the Russian state and the national idea of Russia. Bel'skie prostory. Proza. Poeziia. Publitsistika: Ezhemesiachnyi obshchestvenno-politicheskii i literaturno-khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, vol. 8, no. 105, pp. 109-114. (In Russian)
68. Lattimore O. Inner Asian Frontiers of China. American Geographical Society Research Series, vol. 21, 2nd ed., New York, Capitol Publisher, Irvington, 1951, 542 p.
69. Lepenies W Geschichte und Anthropologie. Zur wissenschaftshistorischen Einschдtzung eines aktuellen Disziplinenkontakts. Geschichte und Gesselschaft. Zeitschrift fьr historische Siocialwissenschaft, 1975, bd. 1, pp. 325-343.
70. Lopasic A. Der historische Gedanke in der Social Anthropologz. Kцlner Ethnologische Mitteilungen, 1965, vol. 4, pp. 118-134.
71. Lowie R. Ethnography, cultural and social anthropology. American Anthropologist, 1953, vol. 55, pp. 527534.
72. Martin, V. Law and Custom in the Steppe. The Kazakhs of the Middle Horde and Russian Colonialism in the Nineteenth Century. Richmond, VA, Curzon Press, 2001, 244 p.
73. Morrison A. St. Russian Rule im Samarkand, 1868-1910: A Comparison with British India. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, 364 p.
74. Mьller K. E. Grundzьge des ethnologischen Historismus. Grundfragen der Ethnologie. Beitrдge zur gegenwдrtigen Theorie-Diskussion, 2nd ed. Ed. by W Schmied-Kowarzik, J. Stagl. Berlin, Reimer Verlag, 1993, pp. 197-253.
75. Nachtigall H. Vцlkerkunde -- Eine Einfьhrung (Suhrkamp Taschenbuch 184), 2nd ed. Stuttgart, Suhrkamp Verlag, Stuttgart, 1979, 150 p.
76. Nippel W Griechen, Barbaren und “Wilde”: Alte Geschichte und Sozialanthropologie. Frankfurt am Main, Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1990, 218 p.
77. Parkes P Milk kinship in Islam. Substance, structure, history. Social Anthropology, 2005, vol. 213, pp. 307329.
78. Perdue P China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2005, 725 p.
79. Petri H. Gibt es eine “Historishe Ethnologie”? Kцlner Ethnologishe Mitttelungen, 1965, vol. 4, ss. 181-195.
80. Petri V E. The old faith of the Buryat people: popular science essay. Irkutsk, Vlast' truda publ., 1928, 78 p. (In Russian)
81. Ratnagar Sh. The Bronze Age: Unique instance of a pre-industrial world system? Current Anthropology, 2001, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 351-379.
82. Reinhard W Die anthropologische Wende der Geschichtswissenschaft. Anthropologische Aufbrьche: Alttestamentliche und interdisziplinдre Zugдnge zur historischen Anthropologie Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments, Bd. 232. Ed. by A. Wagner. Gцttingen, Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 2009.
83. Rethmann P. “Chto Delat”: Etnography in the post-Soviet cultural context. American Anthropologist, 1997, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 770-774.
84. Rogers D. Historical Anthropology meets Soviet History. Kritika. Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2006, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 633-649.
85. Rogers D. The Old Faith and the Russian Land: A Historical Ethnography of Ethics in the Urals. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2009, 338 p.
86. Ro'i Y. The transformation of historiography on the “Punished Peoples” History & Memory, 2009, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 150-176.
87. Sahadeo J. Russian Colonial Society in Tashkent, 1865-1923. Bloomington, Indian University Press, 2007, 316 p.
88. Sheffel D. Z. The Past and the Future of Anthropology in East-Central Europe: Comments on Chris Hann's Vision. Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology Working Paper, vol. 90. Ed. by Ch. Han. Halle/Saale, Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology, 2007.
89. Schlee G. Historishe Ethnologie. Hanbuch der Ethnologie (Festschrift fьr Ulla Johansen). Ed by Th. Schweizer, M. Schweizer, W Kokot. Berlin, Reimer Verlag, 1993, ss. 441-457.
90. Schlee G. How enemies Are Made: Towards a Theory of Ethnic and Religious Conflicts. Integration and Conflict Studies, vol. 1. New York, Berghahn Books, 2008, 204 p.
91. Schmidt-Glintzer H. China. Vielvцlkerreich und Einheitsstaat. Von der Anfдngen bis heute. Mьnchen, C. H. Beck Verlag, 1997, 312 p.
92. Schott R. Das Geschichtsbild der sowjetischen Ethnographie. Saeculum: Jahrbuch fьr Universalgeschichte, 1960, vol. 11, no. 1-2, ss. 27-63.
93. Schnepel B. Die Dschungelkцnige. Ethnohistorische Aspekte von Politik und Ritual in Sьdorissa/Indien. Beitrдge zur Sьdostasienforschung, vol. 177. Stuttgart Franz Steiner Verlag, 1997, 443 s.
94. Schorkowitz D. Die ethnohistorischen Archivdokumente zu den Kalmьcken, Burjaten und Mongolen des Zentralstaatlichen Geschichtsarchives (CGIA) und des Institutsarchives fьr Ethnographie (AIE) in Leningrad. Bibliographische Mitteilungen des Osteuropa-Instituts an der Freien Universitдt Berlin, vol. 25. Berlin, Harrassowitz Verlag, 1988, 277 s.
95. Schorkowitz D. Die soziale und politische Organisation bei den Kalmьcken (Oiraten) und Prozesse der Akkulturation vom 17. Jahrhundert bis zur Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts: Ethnohistorische Untersuchungen ьber die mongolischen Vцlkerschaften. Europдische Hochschulschriften, Reihe XIX, Volkskunde, Ethnologie; Abt. B, Ethnologie, vol. 28. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang Verlag, 1992, 674 s.
96. Schorkowitz D. (ed.). Ethnohistorische Wege und Lehrjahre eines Philosophen: Festschrift fьr Lawrence Krader zum 75. Geburtstag. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang Verlag, 1995, 516 s.
97. Schorkowitz D. Staat und Nationalitдten in RuЯland. Der IntegrationsprozeЯ der Burjaten und Kalmьcken, 1822-1925. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte des цstlichen Europa, vol. 61. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 2001, 616 s.
98. Schorkowitz D. The Orthodox Church, Lamaism and Shamanism among the Buriats and Kalmyks, 18251925. Of Religion and Empire: Missions, Conversion, and Tolerance in Tsarist Russia. Eds R. Geraci, M. Khodarkovsky. Ithaca, Ny, Cornell University Press, 2001, pp. 201-225.
99. Schorkowitz D. Clio und Natio im цstlichen Europa. Historische Zeitschrift, 2004, vol. 279, no. 1, ss. 1-33.
100. Schorkowitz D. Osteuropдische Geschichte und Ethnologie. Panorama und Horizonte. Hundert Jahre Osteuropдische Geschichte. Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte des цstlichen Europa, vol. 68. Ed. by D. Dahlmann. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 2005, ss. 237-256.
101. Schorkowitz D. Gesellschaftliche Emanzipation und nationale Politik der Burjaten, 1825-1925. Sibirische Vцlker: Transkulturelle Beziehung und Identitдten in Nordasien. Periplus. Jahrbuch fьr AuЯereuropдische Geschichte, vol. 17. Mьnster, LIT Verlag, 2007, ss. 175-199.