20. Гидденс Э. Трансформация интимности. Сексуальность, любовь и эротизм в современных обществах. СПб.: Питер, 2004. 208 с.
21. Скотт Дж. Гендер: Полезная категория исторического анализа // Введение в гендерные исследования / под ред. С.В. Жеребкина. Харьков: ХЦГИ ; СПб.: Алетейя, 2001. Ч. 2: Хрестоматия. С. 405-437.
22. Бурдье П. Социология политики. M.: Socio-Logos, 1993. 336 с.
23. Айвазова С.Г. Гендер: граница и / или измерение политического поля. Перечитывая классиков // Политическая наука. 2018. № 2. С. 34-52.
24. Алейников А.В., Артемов Г.П., Пинкевич А.Г. Риск-рефлексии как фактор выбора форм политического участия (по итогам всероссийского опроса) // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Сер. Социология. 2020. Т. 20, № 4. C. 847-863.
25. Zinn J.O. A Comparison of Sociological Theorizing on Risk and Uncertainty // Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction / ed. by J.O. Zinn. Oxford ; Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. P. 174-175.
26. Чирун С.Н., Боброва Е.А. Гендерные особенности политического участия в постсовременной России // Женщина в российском обществе. 2018. № 2 (87). С. 104-115.
27. Музыка Е.В. Гендерные особенности восприятия власти в современной России: дис. ... канд. полит. наук. М.: Мос. гос. ун-т им. М.В. Ломоносова, 2016. 240 с.
References
1. Yanitskiy, O.N. (2004) Rossiya kak obshchestvo riska: metodologiya analiza i kontury kontseptsii [Russia as a Risk Society: Methodology of Analysis and Contours of the Concept]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' - Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2. pp. 5-15.
2. Weinstein, N.D. (1987) Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioural Medicine. 10(5). pp. 481-500.
3. Dolinski, D., Gromski, W. & Zawisza, E. (1987) Unrealistic pessimism. The Journal of Social Psychology. 127. pp. 511-516.
4. Yadov, V.A. (2001) Sotsial'nyy resurs individov i grupp kak ikh kapital: vozmozhnost' prime- neniya universal'noy metodologii issledovaniya real'nogo rassloeniya v rossiyskom obshchestve [The social resource of individuals and groups as their capital: the possibility of using a universal methodology for studying real stratification in Russian society]. In: Zaslavskaya, T.I. (ed.) Kto i kuda stremitsya vesti Rossiyu? Aktory makro-, mezo- i mikrourovney sovremennogo transformatsionnogo protsessa [Who and where is striving to lead Russia? Actors of macro-, meso- and microlevels of the modern transformational process]. Moscow: MHSSES. pp. 314-317.
5. Sukhushina, E.V., Abramova, M.O. & Rykun, A.Yu. (2019) Basic Elements of Masculinity Reproduction Models (Practical Research Experience). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universi- teta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 52. pp. 184-192. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/52/17
6. Diev, V.S. (2011) Risk and uncertainty in philosophy, science and management. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2(14). pp. 79-89. (In Russian).
7. Giddens, A. (1994) Sud'ba, risk i bezopasnost' [Fate, risk and safety]. THESIS. 5. pp. 107-134.
8. Hoffman, I. (2001) Gendernyy displey [Gender display]. In: Zherebkin, S.V. (ed.) Vvedenie v gendernye issledovaniya [Introduction to Gender Studies]. Vol. 2. Kharkov: KhTSI; St. Petersburg: Aleteyya. pp. 306-335.
9. Vorontsov, D.V. (2009) Gendernye issledovaniya v sotsial'noy psikhologii: granitsy polya [Gender studies in social psychology: the boundaries of the field]. Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhur- nal. 6(2). pp. 8-18.
10. Beck, W. (2000) Obshchestvo riska. Naputi k drugomu modernu [The risk society. On the way to another modernity]. Translated from English. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.
11. United Nations. (2009) Snizhenie riska bedstviy s uchetom gendernogo aspekta: Strategiya i prakticheskoe rukovodstvo [Gender-responsive Disaster Risk Reduction: A Strategy and Practical Guide]. Geneva, Switzerland: UNO.
12. Ionov, I.N. (2000) Zhenshchiny i vlast' v Rossii: istoriya i perspektivy [Women and power in Russia: history and prospects]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'- Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 4. pp. 75-87.
13. Bem, S. (2004) Linzy gendera: transformatsiya vzglyadov na problemu neravenstva polov [Lenses of gender: transformation of views on the problem of gender inequality]. Moscow: ROSSPEN.
14. Sillaste, G.G. (2019) The country gender landscape as the factor of a new gender order formation, its social risk. Zhenshchina v rossiyskom obshchestve - Woman in Russian Society. 3. pp. 4-13. (In Russian).
15. Slovic, P. (2000) The Perception of Risks. London: Earthscan.
16. Gavrilov, K.A. (2009) Sotsiologiya vospriyatiya riska: opyt rekonstruktsii klyuchevykh podkhodov [Sociology of Risk Perception: An Experience of Reconstructing Key Approaches]. Moscow: Institute of Sociology, RAS.
17. Slovic, P., Weinstein, M. & Lichtenstein, S. (1957) Sex Differences in the Risks a Person Selects for Himself and the Risks Ne Selects for Someone Else. Research Bulletin. 7(10). pp. 1-13.
18. Slovic, P. (1997) Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics and Science: Surveying the Risk-assessment Battlefield. In: Bazerman, M.H., Messick, D.M., Tenbrunsel, A.E. & Wade-Benzoni, K.A. (eds) Environment, Ethics, and Behavior. San Francisco: New Lexington Press. pp. 277-313.
19. Giddens, A. (1999) Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. Translated from English. Moscow: URSS.
20. Giddens, A. (2004) Transformatsiya intimnosti. Seksual'nost', lyubov' i erotizm v sovremen- nykh obshchestvakh [Transformation of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies]. St. Petersburg: Piter.
21. Scott, J. (2001) Gender: Poleznaya kategoriya istoricheskogo analiza [Gender: A useful category of historical analysis]. In: Zherebkin, S.V. (ed.) Vvedenie vgendernye issledovaniya [Introduction to gender studies]. Kharkov: KhTsGI; St. Petersburg: Aleteyya. pp. 405-437.
22. Bourdieu, P. (1993) Sotsiologiyapolitiki [Sociology of Politics]. Moscow: Socio-Logos.
23. Ayvazova, S.G. (2018) Gender: granitsa i / ili izmerenie politicheskogo polya. Perechityvaya klassikov [Gender: the boundary and/or dimension of the political field. Rereading the classics]. Politicheskaya nauka. 2. pp. 34-52.
24. Aleinikov, A.V., Artemov, G.P. & Pinkevich, A.G. (2020) Risk reflections as a factor for choosing forms of political participation (results of the all-Russian survey). Vestnik Rossiyskogo uni- versiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya -RUDN Journal of Sociology. 20(4). pp. 847-863. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-847-863
25. Zinn, J.O. (2008) A Comparison of Sociological Theorizing on Risk and Uncertainty. In: Zinn, J.O. (ed.) Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 174-175.
26. Chirun, S.N. & Bobrova, E.A. (2018) Gender peculiarities of political participation in postmodern Russia. Zhenshchina v rossiyskom obshchestve - Woman in Russian Society. 2(87). pp. 104-115. (In Russian).
27. Muzyka, E.V. (2016) Gendernye osobennosti vospriyatiya vlasti v sovremennoy Rossii [Gender Features of the Perception of Power in Modern Russia]. Political Sciences Cand. Diss. Moscow.