16.Петрушенко А.Н. Научная обоснованность признаков соучастия в преступлении и их практическая реализация в нормах Особенной части УК РФ // Вестник Нижегородской академии МВД России. 2015. № 1 (29). С. 152-158.
17.Верховенство права и правовое государство : материалы X междунар. науч.-практ. конф. М. : РГУП, 2016. 872 с.
18.Михайлов А.А. Принцип пропорциональности: сущность, практика применения Европейским судом по правам человека, Конституционным судом РФ и значение для совершенствования системы доказывания в современном уголовном процессе России // Уголовная юстиция. 2016. № 1 (7). С. 56-70.
19.Жукова Н.И., Кузнецов В.А., Цветков А.В. Принцип пропорциональности в практике Конституционного Суда РФ // Молодой ученый. 2019. № 5. С. 242-244. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/243/56213/(дата обращения: 01.03.2019).
20.Липкина Н.Н. Правовые позиции Европейского Суда по правам человека относительно свободы усмотрения государств при осуществлении вмешательства в права и основные свободы : дис. . канд. юрид. наук. М., 2008. 225 с.
21.Maunz D. Grundgesetz. 2009. 53. Aufl. S. 109.
22.Малютин Н.С. Проблема оценки соразмерности наказаний в актах судебного толкования (на примере административных штрафов) // Актуальные проблемы российского права. 2015. № 7 (56) июль C. 38-43.
23.Карасев Р.Е. Осуществление КС РФ защиты прав и свобод человека и гражданина : автореф. дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. Тюмень, 2016. 31 с.
24.О некоторых вопросах судебной практики по делам о преступлениях против конституционных прав и свобод человека и гражданина (статьи 137, 138, 138.1, 139, 144.1, 145, 145.1 Уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации : ППВС РФ № 46 от 25.12.2018. URL: // http://www.supcourt.ru/documents/own/27537/
25.О внесении изменения в статью 138.1 Уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации: Федеральный закон от 02.08.2019 № 308-ФЗ. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_330689/
REFERENCES
1.Plokhova, V.I. (2019) [Evaluation of modern approaches to the implementation of criminal liability from the perspective of proportionality of ac
tion and responsibility]. Ugolovnoepravo: strategiya razvitiyav XXIveke[Criminal law: Development strategy in the 21st century]. Proceedings of the International Conference. Moscow: RG-Press. pp. 323-328. (In Russian).
2.Plohova, V.I. (2017) The Use of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation when
Investi gating the Problems of the Criminal Law of the Russian Federation (Article One). Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal 'nogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki -- Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 10 (7). pp. 1090-1100.
3.Varlamova, N.V. et al. (2000) Kontseptsiya stabil'nosti zakona[The concept of stability of the law]. Moscow: Prospekt.
4.Plokhova, V.I. (2018) The forced ambiguity of criminal law norms and (or) incorrect consolidation, interpretation of their features (based on Arti
cle 138.1 of the RF Criminal Code). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta -- Tomsk State University Journal. 433. pp. 207-215. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/15617793/433/28
5.Plokhova, V.I. (2017) [Algorithm for assessing the compliance of laws and law enforcement with the conditions of lawful restriction of human
rights in the criminal law sphere]. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiyav 21 veke[Criminal Law: Development Strategy in the 21st Century]. Proceedings of the International Conference. 26-27 January 2017. Moscow: Kutafin Moscow State Law University. pp. 137-138. (In Russian).
6.Taeva, N.E. (2018) Normy konstitutsionnogo pravav sisteme pravovogo regulirovaniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii[The norms of constitutional law in
the system of legal regulation of the Russian Federation]. Abstract of Law Dr. Diss. Moscow.
7.Plokhova, V.I. (2014) Constitutional and international rules in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal
Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava -- Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law. 2. pp. 96-104. (In Russian).
8.Plokhova, V.I. (2014) Terms of legitimate restrictions of human rights and freedoms in criminal sphere. Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo
gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava -- Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law. 4. pp. 83-92. (In Russian).
9.Plokhova, V.I. (2016) Substantial conditions for the lawful restriction of rights and freedoms in the criminal sphere (general issues). Kriminolog
icheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava -- Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law. 10 (1). pp. 105-116. (In Russian).
10.Mal'tsev, V.V. (2001) Printsipy ugolovnogoprava[The principles of criminal law]. Volgograd: Volgograd Academy of the MIA of Russia.
11.Sidorenko, A.I. (2016) Printsip pravovoy opredelennostiv sudebnoy praktike: implementatsiya resheniy evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [The principle of legal certainty in judicial practice: implementation of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights]. Abstract of Law Cand. Diss. Perm', 28 c.
12.Derbysheva, E.A. (2017) Printsip pravovoy opredelennosti kak trebovanie opredelennosti normy prava [The principle of legal certainty as a requirement for the certainty of a rule of law]. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya.2. pp. 68-80. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2017.2.21970. [Online] Available from: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_21970.html.
13.Malyutin, N.S. (2016) Sudebnoe tolkovanie normativnykh pravovykh aktov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovoy aspekt[Judicial interpretation of regulatory legal acts in the Russian Federation: A constitutional-legal aspect]. Abstract of Law Cand. Diss. Moscow.
14.Supcourt.ru. (2013) O primenenii sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod ot 4 noyabrya 1950 goda i Protokolov кney: PPVS RF № 21 ot 27.06.2013[On the application by courts of general jurisdiction of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of November 4, 1950, and its Protocols: Ruling of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 21 of 27 June 2013]. [Online] Available from: http://www.supcourt.ru/documents/own/8352/.
15.Nechaev, A.D. (2017) Kontseptual'nye osnovy i teoreticheskoe modelirovanie kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii[Conceptual foundations and theoretical modeling of criminalization and decriminalization]. Law Cand. Diss. Saratov.
16.Petrushenko, A.N. (2015) Scientific Foundation of Complicity Characteristics and Its Practical Realization in the Articles of Specific Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii -- Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 1 (29). pp. 152-158. (In Russian).
17.Syrykh, V.V. & Vlasenko, V.N. (eds) (2016) Verkhovenstvo prava i pravovoe gosudarstvo[The rule of law and the rule of law]. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice.
18.Mikhaylov, A.A. (2016) The Principle of Proportionality: Essence, Practices of the European Court of Human Rights, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and Importance for Improvement of the System of Proof in the Modern Criminal Process in Russia. Ugolovnaya yustitsiya -- Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 1 (7). pp. 56-70. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/23088451/7/9
19.Zhukova, N.I., Kuznetsov, V.A. & Tsvetkov, A.V. (2019) Printsip proportsional'nosti v praktike Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF [The principle of proportionality in the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Molodoy uchenyy -- Young Scientist. 5. pp. 242-244. [Online] Available from: https://moluch.ru/archive/243/56213/. (Accessed: 01.03.2019).
20.Lipkina, N.N. (2008) Pravovye pozitsii Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka otnositel'no svobody usmotreniya gosudarstv pri osushchestvlenii vmeshatel 'stvav prava i osnovnye svobody[Legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights regarding freedom of discretion of states when intervening in rights and fundamental freedoms]. Law Cand. Diss. Moscow.
21.Maunz, D. (2009) Grundgesetz. 53. Aufl.
22.Malyutin, N.S. (2015) Problem of Evaluating Punishment Proportionality in the Acts of Judicial Interpretation (Based upon Examples of Administrative Fines). Aktual 'nyeproblemy rossiyskogoprava. 7 (56). July. pp. 38-43. (In Russian).
23.Karasev, R.E. (2016) Osushchestvlenie KS RF zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina[The protection of human and civil rights and freedoms by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Abstract of Law Cand. Diss. Tyumen.
24.Supcourt.ru. (2018) O nekotorykh voprosakh sudebnoy praktiki po delam o prestupleniyakh protiv konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina (stat'i 137, 138, 138.1, 139, 144.1, 145, 145.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: PPVS RF № 46 ot 25.12.2018[On some issues of judicial practice in cases of crimes against constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen (Articles 137, 138, 138.1, 139, 144.1, 145, 145.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: Ruling of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 46 of 25 December 2018]. [Online] Available from: http://www.supcourt.ru/documents/own/27537/.
25.Consultant.ru. (2019) O vnesenii izmeneniyav stat'yu 138.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Federal'nyy zakon ot 02.08.2019 № 308-FZ[On amending Article 138.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: Federal Law No. 308-FZ of 02 August 2019]. [Online] Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_330689/.