very skillful and uses chanting and ritual to give the act meaning.
The Moslems also incorporated circumcision into their culture. During their invasion of India they were horrified to find that Hindus and Buddhists were uncircumcised. Circumcision became a prerequisite for acceptance as a convert to the new religion; the same swords used in battle were used for this purpose.
In the Orient circumcision is very rare. The Indian and Tibetan teachings on the subject stress that it is only useful for medical reasons, such as when a foreskin cannot be retracted and sexual intercourse is impaired. Concerning China, R. H. Van Gulik, the celebrated Orientalist and sexologist, writes: "It is worth noting that there are no traces of painful manhood or womanhood initiation rites for either boys or girls, and that circumcision for boys and clitoridectomy for girls were both completely unknown."
In the past, circumcision has always been the culmination of an initiation rite, either into a patriarchal group or into the tribe. Many primitive African tribes use the rite of circumcision as a test of endurance and as an initiation into a cult. Although circumcision is a very minor operation, its psychological effects can be devastating. This is particularly true in the modern setting, where circumcision is often carried out as a purely clinical rather than a ritual act. Babies are extremely impressionable, and although the pain is relatively slight, there is a danger that circumcision may create psychological and sexual problems unless the right attitude is brought to bear.
If the father is circumcised, more often than not his son will also be. If a family wishes to maintain a tradition of circumcision, it is advisable to have the operation performed as a meaningful ritual and to employ a circumcising priest. If the family is hesitant, then the decision should wait until the child is old enough to understand exactly what is transpiring and why. Since the operation can be carried out at any age, and painlessly with anesthetics, there seems little point in early circumcision, unless is it dictated by custom or medical necessity.
Male circumcision consists in the surgical removal of part or all of the foreskin. Generally, there is a tendency to overcircumcise. This is particularly easy with an infant, since it is difficult to judge the precise amount of
skin to be removed. Therefore it is preferable to half-circumcise in such cases, by re- m o v i n g only the outermost tip of the foreskin. Even in a grown man the circumcision wound is not particularly painful; it heals in about nine days, and normal sexual intercourse can be resumed after three weeks.
Circumcision is by no means necessary for hygienic reasons. An uncircumcised boy, however, should be taught h o w to keep his Lingam clean. Parents should explain how to carefully retract the foreskin and wash the inner Lingam at least every few days. In an uncircumcised boy the foreskin should not be fully retracted until after the age of three.
Some medical conditions make circumcision advisable. The persistent recurrence of itching, soreness, and redness of the inner surface of the foreskin and the head of the Lingam is one such indication. If in doubt about whether or not to circumcise for medical reasons, it is best to consult a specialist.
Some have suggested that premature ejaculation can sometimes by cured by circumcision, even at a relatively late stage in life, since it results in a decrease in the Lingam's sensitivity. On the other hand, some consider this decrease in sensitivity one of the disadvantages of the operation. Medical opinion is divided about equally for and against the general practice of circumcision, though in most hospitals it is performed routinely on male infants. We feel that a clinical hospital environment for circumcision is the most unpleasant aspect of this operation, and as such is best avoided.
As for female circumcision (the surgical removal of all or part of the clitoris), it must surely be one of man's most cruel inventions. It is first referred to in the late Ptolemaic period of Egyptian history (circa 3Q0—30 B.C.) and is still practiced in some Arab and African cultures. It was introduced to the West in Victorian times, supposedly to stop young girls from playing with their Yonis. Fortunately this practice has been discontinued in the West.
The choice for male circumcision is an aspect of sexuality best left to the individual or family. Outside the hospital setting, it can be a meaningful ritual, with some possible physical benefits. However, there is a strong case for delaying the decision to circumcise or not until the boy is of age to decide for himself.
She asked him through the interpreter why it is that Moslems demanded circumcision and caused so much suffering to their boys. "Besides," she concluded, "it is interference with God's manner of creation and useless at that." "Ah," said the Moslem Ruler, "tell her that circumcision is the greatest value, for a branch, if pruned, grows strong and thick and sturdy. So long as this operation is not carried out, it will remain thin and weak."
IBN HAYYAN