19. Порозова Д. Ю. Гештальт как основа визуального восприятия // Человек в мире культуры. 2012. № 3. С. 23-28.
20. Савчук В. В. Медиафилософия. Приступ реальности. СПб.: Изд-во РХГА, 2013. 350 с.
21. Склярова В. С. Визуальные повороты и зрелищная культура: теоретические аспекты и культурные практики // Вестник культуры и искусств. 2017. № 4. С. 116-121.
22. Терентьева И. Н. Визуальное, слишком визуальное (к характеристике иконического поворота в современных медиа и актуальных медиаисследованиях) // Вестник Нижегородского государственного технического университета им. Р Е. Алексеева. Серия «Управление в социальных системах. Коммуникативные технологии». 2012. № 2. С. 29-35.
23. Фрагменты ранних греческих философов. Ч. 1. От эпических теокосмогоний до возникновения атомистики / сост. А. В. Лебедев. М.: Наука, 1993. 576 с.
24. Хок Р Р 40 исследований, которые потрясли психологию. СПб.: Прайм-Еврознак, 2003. 416 с.
25. Шаталов В. Ф. Педагогическая проза. Архангельск: Сев.-Зап. кн. изд-во, 1990. 383 с.
26. Anderson M., Bernd M., Patrick O. Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning. London: UK, 2002. Pp. 277.
27. Klink H. Art Theory as Visual Epistemology. Cambridge: Scholars Publishing, 2014. P. 147.
28. Lynch M. Pictures of Nothing? Visual Construals in Social Theory // Sociological Theory. 1991. Vol. 9, No. 1. Pp. 1-21.
29. Wright R. Computer Graphics as Allegorical Knowledge: Electronic Imagery in the Sciences. Leonardo: Supplemental Issue. 1990. Pp. 65-73.
References
1. Antipov, M. A. Screen as the communication basis of a post-modern society. XXI century: results of the past and problems of the present. Penza: PGTA, vol. 8, pp. 216-221, 2013. (In Rus.)
2. Arnheim, R. Art and visual perception. M: Architecture, 2007. (In Rus.)
3. Bataeva, E. V. Visual Concepts in Classical German Philosophy. Humanitarian Clockwork, no. 2, pp. 41-46, 2011. (In Rus.)
4. Bataeva, E. V. Flanning and video mania: modern and post-modern visual practices, Vopr. philosophii, no. 11, pp. 61-68, 2012. (In Rus.)
5. Bereznyak, M. V. Visual Essentialism and the Object of Visual Research. Trans. from English by Ya. Levchenko. Logos, no. 1, pp. 212-242, 2012. (In Rus.)
6. Buzan, T., Buzan, B. Superthinking. Minsk: OOO “Potpourri”, 2003. (In Rus.)
7. Wertheimer, M. Productive Thinking. Trans. from English, ed. by S. F Gorbova, V. P. Zinchenko. M: Progress, 1987. (In Rus.)
8. Zhukovsky, V. I., Pivovarov, D. V., Zhukovsky, V. I. Visible essence: (visual thinking in graphic art). Sverdlovsk: Publishing House Ural. University, 1991. (In Rus.)
9. Zhukovsky, V. I. Visual thinking in the process of artistic creation. Philosophy and Culture, no. 4, pp. 618-626, 2014. (In Rus.)
10. Comenius, J. A. Great didactics. Selected Pedagogical Works. M: Uch. ped. publishing house, 1955. (In Rus.)
11. Kucherova, A. Visualization of EDUCATIONAL information in the process of teaching drawing. Modern problems of science and education, no. 2, pp. 3-12, 2019. (In Rus.)
12. Latour, B. Visualization and cognition: portraying things together. Logos, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 95-156, 2017. (In Rus.)
13. Makulin, A. V. Social visosophy: infographics, visualization and the graphic language of socio- philosophical knowledge: Dr. philos. sci. diss. Arkhangelsk, 2019. (In Rus.)
14. Maslov, V. M. Visibility and visualization in the paradigmatic and humanistic planes. Modern problems of science and education, 2014, no. 2. Web. 05.01.2020. https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/ view?id=12460. (In Rus.)
15. Pestalozzi, I. G. Pedagogy. Selected pedagogical essays. Collected works. In 2 vol. V. 1. M: Pedagogy, 1981. (In Rus.)
16. Pivovarov, D. V. On the relationship of sensory and rational in the cognitive process. Sensual and rational. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Sverdlovsk: Publishing House Ural state. Univ., 1982: 3-13. (In Rus.)
17. Pivovarov, D. V. Visual Thinking. Modern Philosophical Dictionary. Ed. by B. E. Kemerovo. London, Frankfurt, Paris, Luxembourg, Moscow, Minsk: Panprint, 1998. Web. 05.01.2020. https://www.philosophydic. ru. (In Rus.)
18. Polyakov, V. M. Neuropsychology in screening studies of child populations. Ed. by Akhutina, T V., Glozman, J. M. Second Int. Conf., dedicated to the 100th birthday of A. R. Luria. Glozman. M: Fedorovets LLC, 2003: 199-209. (In Rus.)
19. Porozova, D. Yu. Gestalt as the basis of visual perception. Man in the world of culture, no. 3, pp. 2328, 2012. (In Rus.)
20. Savchuk, V. V. Media philosophy. Fit of reality. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Arts, 2013. (In Rus.)
21. Sklyarova, V. S. Visual turns and spectacular culture theoretical aspects and cultural practices. Bulletin of Culture and Arts, no.4, pp. 116-121, 2017. (In Rus.)
22. Terentyeva, I. N. Visual, too visual (to the characterization of the iconic turn in modern media and relevant media research). Vestnik NSTU im. R. E. Alekseeva. Management in social systems. Communicative technologies, no. 2, pp. 29-35, 2012. (In Rus.)
23. Fragments of the early Greek philosophers. Part 1. From epic theocosmogonies to the emergence of atomism. Compiled by Lebedev, A. V. M: Nauka, 1993. (In Rus.)
24. Hawk, R. R. 40 studies that shocked psychology. SPb: Prime-Euroznak, 2003. (In Rus.)
25. Shatalov, V. F. Pedagogical prose. Arkhangelsk: North-West Prince Publishing House, 1990. (In Rus.)
26. Anderson, M., Bernd, M., Patrick, O. Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning. London, UK. 2002. (In Engl.)
27. Klink, H. (ed.) Art Theory as Visual Epistemology. Cambridge: Scholars Publishing. 2014. (In Engl.)
28. Lynch, M. Pictures of Nothing? Visual Construals in Social Theory. Sociological Theory, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 1991. (In Engl.)
29. Wright, R. Computer Graphics as Allegorical Knowledge. Electronic Imagery in the Sciences. Leonardo. Supplemental Issue. 1990: 65-73. (In Engl.)