8. Сюбаев И.И. Определение наиболее тяжкого из совершенных преступлений // Уголовное право. 2017. № 1. С. 95-99.
9. Курс уголовного процесса / под ред. Л.В. Головко. М.: Статут, 2016 // СПС Консультант Плюс (дата обращения: 29.10.2019).
References
1. Popova, E.I. & Garmaev, Yu.P. (2015) Ispol'zovanie v khodepredvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya norm ob osobomporyadke sudebnogo razbiratel'stva (kriminalisticheskiy kommentariy k normam glavy 40 UPK RF) [The rules on the special procedure for the trial applied in the preliminary investigation (forensic commentary on the norms of Chapter 40 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation)]. [Online] Available from: Konsul'tant Plyus. (Accessed: 29th October 2019).
2. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. (n.d.) Resolution No. 4-P of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of February 25, 2004, “On constitutionality of Clause 10 of Article 75 of the Federal Law `On Basic Guarantees of Electoral Rights and the Right to Participate in the Referendum of Citizens of the Russian Federation ' and the first part of Article 259 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation". [Online] Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_46769/. (Accessed: 29th October 2019). (In Russian).
3. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. (n.d.) Resolution No. 9-P of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of March 16, 1998, “On constitutionality of Article 44 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR and Article 123 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the RSFSR in connection with complaints of a number of citizens". [Online] Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_18147/ (Accessed: 29th October 2019). (In Russian).
4. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. (n.d.) Resolution No. 39-P of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of November 9, 2018, “On constitutionality of Parts One and Three of Article 1, Parts One, Three and Four of Article 35 of th e Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in connection with complaints by citizens A. V. Lushnikov, A.S. Pushkarev andI.S. Pushkarev". [Online] Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_310692/ (Accessed: 29th October 2019). (In Russian).
5. Sukharev, A.Ya. (ed.) (2004) Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary on the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation (by articles)]. Moscow: Norma.
6. Ryzhakov, A.P. (ed.) (2014) Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary on the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation (by articles)]. [Online] Available from: http://base.garant.ru/57571740/ (Accessed: 31st October 2019).
7. Lebedev, V.M. (ed.) (2011) Proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam v sude pervoy instantsii [Criminal proceedings in the court of first instance].Moscow: Norma.
8. Syubaev, I.I. (2017) Determination of the most serious of the crimes committed. Ugolovnoe pravo. 1. pp. 95-99. (In Russian).
9. Golovko, L.V. (ed.) (2016) Kurs ugolovnogoprotsessa [Criminal Process]. Moscow: Statut.