11. Норт Д., Уоллис Дж., Вайнгаст Б. Насилие и социальные порядки. Концептуальные рамки для интерпретации письменной истории человечества. М.: Изд-во Ин-та Гайдара, 2011.480 с.
12. Хабермас Ю. Философский дискурс о модерне. М.: Весь мир, 2003. 416с.
13. Шпенглер О. Закат Европы. Т. I. Образ и действительность. Новосибирск: Наука: Сибирская издательская фирма, 1993. 592 с.
14. Энгельс Ф. [Письмо] Ф. Мерингу // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. 2-е изд. Т. 39. С. 82-86.
15. Энгельс Ф. Диалектика природы // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. 2-е изд. Т. 20. С. 339-626.
16. Berger P., Lukman T. (1995) Social'noe kon- struirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sociologii znanija. Moscow, Medium, 323 p. [in Rus].
17. Bogdanov A.A. (1989) Tektologija: (Vseobsh- haja organizacionnaja nauka): 2 kn. Kn. 1. Moscow, Jekonomika, 304 p. [in Rus].
18. Bjekon F. (1971) Velikoe Vosstanovlenie Nauk / Bjekon F. Soch.: v 2 t. T.1. Moscow, Mysl', pp. 57-546 [in Rus].
19. Dekart R. (1989) Soch.: v 2 t. T. I. Moscow, Mysl', 654 p. [in Rus].
20. Kant I. 91994) Kritika chistogo razuma. Moscow, Mysl', 391 p. [in Rus].
21. Makiavelli N. (1997) Gosudar'. Rassuzhdenija o pervoj dekade Tita Livija. O voennom iskusstve. Moscow, Mysl', 639 p. [in Rus].
22. Marks K., Jengel's F. (1955) Nemeckaja ideologi- ja // Marks K., Jengel's F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 3. Moscow, Politizdat, 629 p. [in Rus].
23. Morozov N. (2012) Vestnik Rossijskoj nacii, no. 1. pp. 67-88 [in Rus].
24. Moskovichi S. (1998) Vek tolp. Istoricheskij traktat po psihologii mass. Moscow, Centr psihologii i psihoterapii, 480 p. [in Rus].
25. Nort D. (2010) Ponimanie processa jekonom- icheskih izmenenij. Moscow, Izdatel'skij dom Gosu- dastvennogo universitetata - Vysshej shkoly jekono- miki, 256 p. [in Rus].
26. Nort D., Uollis Dzh., Vajngast B. (2011) Nasilie i social'nye porjadki. Konceptual'nye ramki dlja inter- pretacii pis'mennoj istorii chelovechestva. Moscow, Izdatel'stvovo Instituta Gajdara, 480 p. [in Rus].
27. Habermas Ju. (2003) Filosofskij diskurs o moderne. Moscow, Ves' mir, 416 p. [in Rus].
28. Shpengler O. (1993) Zakat Evropy. T. I. Obraz i dejstvitel'nost'. Novosibirsk, Nauka, Sibirskaja izdatel'skaja firma, 592 p. [in Rus].
29. Jengel's F. [Pis'mo] F. Meringu // Marks K., Jengel's F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 39. pp. 82-86. [in Rus].
30. Jengel's F. Dialektika prirody // Marks K., Jengel's F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 20. pp. 339-626. [in Rus].
31. For citing: Skorobogatskaya N.A., Skorobogatsky V.V. Problem of methodology of social cognition in the light of design principle (background information) // Socium i vlast. 2018. № 1 (69). P. 7-17.
Annotation
PROBLEMOF METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL COGNITION IN THE LIGHT OF DESIGN PRINCIPLE (background information)
Skorobogatskaya Natalya Aleksandrovna, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Eltsin, Associate Professor, Cand.Sc. (Philosophy), Russian Federation,
Skorobogatsky Vyacheslav Vasilyevich, Ural Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA, Professor, Doctor of Philosophy, Russian Federation,
The article dwells upon the problem of forming the methodology of social cognition and its historic evolution. Proceeding rom the assumption that a design principle has a key role in this process, the authors try to reveal the conditions and reasons for ideologization of social cognition in the Soviet science of the XX century.
Ulterior motive for stagnation in the sphere of methodology of social cognition in modern Russian science is the discourse of revolution. It was formed under the influence of system transformation of European society in the spheres of politics, economy, social institutions, and culture. Under the name of Marxian dialectic it has become not only metamethodology of social science but had a negative effect in some branches of natural science and mathematics.
As the first step of renovating methodology of social cognition the authors consider deideologization as a process of eliminating the discourse of revolution and creating conditions for forming a new general scientific discourse.
Key concepts: methodology of social cognition, design principle, ideology, dialectic as discourse of revolution, metamethodology.