Статья: Особый порядок судебного разбирательства при согласии обвиняемого с предъявленным обвинением: последствия принятой к закону поправки

Внимание! Если размещение файла нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам

3. Ramazanov I. Epokha vozrozhdeniia [The era of revival]. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal process], 2020, no. 8. Available at: https://e.ugpr.ru/826617 (accessed 17.10.2020).

4. Golovko L.V. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo v usloviiakh permanentnoi sudebnoi reformy [Criminal proceedings in the context of permanent judicial reform]. Zakon [Law], 2019, no. 4, pp. 67-82. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/ item.asp?id=38095581 [in Russian].

5. Kachalova O. V. Garantirovannogo prava na osobyi poriadok net ni u odnogo obviniaemogo [Not a single accused has a guaranteed right to a special order]. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal process], 2020, no. 9. Available at: https://e.ugpr.ru/833457 (accessed 19.07.2020) [in Russian].

6. Azarenok N. V Tselesoobrazno li iskliuchenie prestuplenii tiazhkoi kategorii iz osobogo poriadka sudebnogo razbiratel'stva, predusmotrennogo glavoi 40 UPK RF? [Is It Practical to Exclude Grave Crimes from Special Judicial Proceedings Stipulated by Chapter 40 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation?]. Rossiiskii sud'ia [Russian Judge], 2019, no. 9, pp. 48-51. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39262810 [in Russian].

7. Kolokolov N. A. Institut PleaBargaining v Rossii: opravdan li shag nazad? [The Plea Bargaining Institution in Russia: Is the Step Back Justified?]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo [Criminal Judicial Proceeding], 2020, no. 3, pp. 3-10. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=43870350

8. Yartsev R. V. Osobyiporiadoksudebnogo razbiratel'stva: novye podkhody ili starye oshibki (na osnove monitoringa zakonodatel'stva i pravoprimenitel'noi deiatel'nosti) [Special procedure of the trial: new approaches or old mistakes (based on monitoring of legislation and law enforcement activity)]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo [Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod], 2020, no. 2, pp. 234-252. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=42853466 [in Russian].

9. Yakimovich Yu. K., Lensky A. V, Trubnikova T V Differentsiatsiia ugolovnogo protsessa. Pod red. M. K. Sviridova [Differentiation of the criminal process. Sviridov M. K. (Ed.)]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2001, 300 p. [in Russian].

10. Golovshchinsky K. I., Gladyshev P S., Davydov M. I., Shishkin E. A. Normirovanie nagruzki v federal'nykh sudakh obshchei iurisdiktsii i federal'nykh arbitrazhnykh sudakh [Rationing of workload in federal courts of general jurisdiction and federal arbitration courts]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2019, 296 p. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/books/332598940 (accessed 20.07.2020) [in Russian].

11. Effektivnost' pravosudiia i problema ustraneniia sudebnykh oshibok / pod red. V.N. Kudriavtseva. T. 1 [Kudryavtsev V. N. (Ed.) Effectiveness of justice and the problem of eliminating judicial errors. Vol. 1]. Moscow, 1975, 298 p. Available at: https://www.iuaj.net/node/846 [in Russian].