Литература
1. Арутюнова, Н. Д. (1981). Фактор адресата. Известия Академии наук СССР. Серия литературы и языка, 40 (4), 356-367.
2. Бахтин, М. М. (2000). Постановка проблемы и определение речевых жанров. В Автор и герой. К философским основам гуманитарных наук (с. 249-258). Санкт-Петербург: Азбука.
3. Бахтин, М. М. (1979). Эстетика словесного творчества. Москва: Искусство.
4. Дускаева, Л. Р. (1995). Диалогичность газетных текстов 1981-1991.Дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Пермь.
5. Дускаева, Л. Р. (2004). Диалогичность современных газетных текстов в аспекте речевых жанров. Пермь: Изд-во Пермского университета.
6. Жуланова, Е. А. (2002). Диалогичность учебно-научного монолога в речевой ситуации школьного обучения. Дис. . канд. филол. наук. Екатеринбург.
7. Лотман, Ю. М. (1981). Текст в тексте. Труды по знаковым системам, 14, 423-436.
8. Майданова, Л. М. (1987). Структура и композиция газетного текста. Красноярск: Изд-во Красноярского университета.
9. Милевская, Т Е. (1985). Средства выражения речевого контакта в русском языке (вопросно-ответный комплекс в научно-популярном произведении).Дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Ленинград.
10. Нистратова, С. Л. (1985). Коммуникативная направленность и стилистическая дифференциация синтаксических средств выражения адресованности речи в письменной и устной сферах коммуникации на научные темы.Дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Москва.
11. Подъяпольская, О. Ю. (2004). Типология адресованности в текстах эпистолярного жанра (на материале писем Ф. Кафки).Дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Челябинск.
12. Светана, С. В. (1985). О диалогизации монолога. Филологические науки, 5, 39-46.
13. Славгородская, Л. В. (1986). Научный диалог. Ленинград: Наука.
14. Тепляшина, А. Н. (2006). Жанры и формы комического в современной российской периодике. Санкт- Петербург: Изд-во СПбГУ
15. Чепкина, Э. В. (1993). Внутритекстовые автор и адресат газетного текста.Дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Екатеринбург.
16. ЧжаоАйша. (1993). Диалогизация монологического текста как средство воздействия на читателя (на материале публицистики).Дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Москва.
17. Arutiunova, N. D. (1981). Destination factor. IzvestiiaAkademiinauk SSSR. Serna literaturyiiazyka, 40 (4), 356-367. (In Russian)
18. Bakhtin, M. M. (2000). Problem Setting and Definition of Speech Genres, Author and Hero. In To philosophical foundations of humanities (pp. 249-258). St. Petersburg: Azbuka Publ. (In Russian)
19. Bakhtin, M. M. (1979). Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)
20. Chepkina, E. V. (1993). In-house author and addressee of newspaper text. PhD thesis. Ekaterinburg. (In Russian)
21. Duskaeva, L. R. (1995). Dialogue of newspaper texts 1981-1991. PhD thesis. Perm'. (In Russian)
22. Duskaeva, L. R. (2004). Dialogue of modern newspaper texts in the aspect of speech genres. Perm': Perm. Univ. Publ. (In Russian)
23. Lotman, Iu. M. (1981). Text in text. Works on landmark systems, 14, 423-436. (In Russian)
24. Maidanova, L. M. (1987). Structure and composition of newspaper text.Krasnoiarsk: Krasnoiarsk State Univ. Publ. (In Russian)
25. Milevskaia, T. E. (1985). Means of expressing speech contact in Russian (question-taking complex in scientific- popular work). PhD thesis. Leningrad. (In Russian)
26. Nistratova, S. L. (1985). Communicative focus and stylistic differentiation of syntax means of expression of speech addressability in written and oral spheres of communication on scientific topics. PhD thesis. Moscow. (In Russian)
27. Pod”iapol'skaia, O. Iu. (2004). Typology of addressability in texts of epistolar genre (On the material of the letters of F. Kafka). PhD thesis. Cheliabinsk. (In Russian)
28. Slavgorodskaia, L. V (1986). Scientific dialogue. Leningrad: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
29. Svetana, S. V. (1985). On Dialogue of Monologue. Philological Sciences, 5, 39-46. (In Russian)
30. Tepliashina, A. N. (2006). Genres and forms of comic in modern Russian periodicals. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Univ. Publ. (In Russian)
31. Zhao Aisha. (1993). Dialogue of monologue text as a means of influencing the reader (on the material of publishing). PhD thesis. Moscow. (In Russian)
32. Zhulanova, E. A. (2002). Dialogue of educational and scientific monologue in the speech situation of school education. PhD thesis. Ekaterinburg. (In Russian)
Perception of аcomic text-prank in the dialogue of network communication: Creating a problem
L. R. Duskaeva, E. A. ShcheglovaSt. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
The modern Russian political discourse is characterized by the thrust of the vector of satirical modality against an external enemy, which is played by states that support the policy of sanctions and oppose Russia in the foreign policy arena. The satire has a polemic charge corresponding to the communicative task of exposing and convicting the enemy. The comical source is the contradictions of the very reality. The goal of the research is to identify communicative response regularities to comic manifestations which are found in media speech interaction. The discovery of these patterns makes it possible to understand how the embeddedness of any text in a dialogue (its intermediate position in communication) affects the features of text making. Our focus is on model text forms that originate from a result of the “meeting” of two texts. The material of this study is the media discourse centered on the prank by Vovan and Lexus, based on the joke over US Congresswoman, Maxine Waters, which was posted by Russian media: “RIA Novosti”, “Gazeta.ru”, “Nezavisimoyeobozreniye (Independent review)”, “Tsargrad”, and others. The comedy formed by the prank arose from the contradiction between the US political establishment representatives' arrogance, the way they appear in the Russian media, and their ignorance. We analyzed speech models of users' comments to the video prank on YouTube and to publications about it in network media. As the study illustrated, several types of reactions to the prank are formed in network communication: disapproval of the prank and pranksters, approval of the pranksters' actions, ridiculing the “victim”of the prank, expressing an emotional reaction to the comic form, expressing a reaction to the satirical content, comical playful comments, and encouraging pranksters to conduct furtheractivities.
Keywords: dialogue, comic, network communication, reaction types, prank.