17. Евстафьева Е.В., Богданова А.М., Большунова Т.С., Барановская Н.В., Осипова Н.А. Содержание ртути в эпифитных лишайниках на территории Республики Крым // Известия Томского политехнического университета. Инжиниринг георесурсов. 2019. Т 330, № 7. С. 93-103. doi: 10.18799/24131830/2019/7/2180
18. Портал Правительства Республики Крым. URL: meco.rk.gov.ru/ru/structure/60 (дата обращения: 31.03.2020).
19. Эколого-ресурсный потенциал Крыма. История формирования и перспективы развития / Е.Ю. Барабошкин, Т.А. Барабошкина, Е.П. Каюкова и др. ; под ред. Е.Ю. Барабошкина, Е.В. Ясеневой. СПб. : ВВМ, 2016. Т. 1.435 с.
20. Драган Н.А. Сравнительная оценка качества почвенных ресурсов Крыма // Ученые записки Крымского федерального университета имени В.И. Вернадского. География. Геология. 2011. Т 24, №. 2-1. С. 260-266.
21. Анализ тенденций социально-экономического развития Республики Крым / под ред. Ю.П. Майданевич. Симферополь : ПОЛИПРИНТ, 2019. 362 с.
22. Геология ртутных месторождений и рудопроявлений Украины / В.И. Скаржинский, И.Р. Белоус, С.И. Кирикилица и др. ; под ред В.И. Скаржинского. Киев : Наукова думка, 1975. 285 с.
23. Аксенов Е.М., Беляев Е.В., Садыков Р.К. Минерально-сырьевой потенциал твердых полезных ископаемых Крымского федерального округа // Разведка и охрана недр. 2015. № 9. С. 38-46.
24. Mycobank. URL: www.mycobank.org (дата обращения: 31.03.2020).
25. Bargagli R., Nimis P.L. Guidelines for the use of epiphytic lichens as biomonitors of atmospheric deposition of trace elements // Monitoring with Lichen - Monitoring Lichens. NATO Science Series (Series IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences). 2002. № 7. РР. 295299. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0423-7_23
26. Panichev N., Mokgalaka N., Panicheva S. Assessment of air pollution by mercury in South African provinces using lichens Parmelia caperata as bioindicators // Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2019. Vol. 41. PP. 2239-2250. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019- 00283-w
27. Esbri J.M., Lopez-Berdonces M.A., Fernandez-Calderon S., Higueras P., Diez S. Atmospheric mercury pollution around a chlor-alkali plant in Flix (NE Spain): An integrated analysis // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2015. Vol. 22. PP. 4842-4850. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3305-x
28. The Jamovi Project (2020). Jamovi. (Version 1.2). URL: https://www.jamovi.org (accessed: 31.03.2020).
29. Добровольский В.В. Основы биогеохимии : учебник для студ. вузов. М. : Академия, 2003. 400 с.
30. Ляпина Е.Е. Геоэкологические особенности ртутной нагрузки на территорию Томской области по данным биомониторинговых исследований // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015. № 1 (2).
31. Плотицына О.В., Стецюк А.П., Поповичев В.Н. Распределение ртути в воде соленых озер северо-западной части Крыма, Черного моря и севастопольских бухт // Экологическая безопасность прибрежной и шельфовой зон. 2014. № 28. С. 225-230.
32. Шнюков Е.Ф., Нетребская Е.Я. Глубинное геологическое строение грязевых вулканов Черного моря // Геология и полезные ископаемые Мирового океана. 2014. Т. 2, № 36. С. 66-79.
33. Zhang H., Yin R.S., Feng X.B., Sommar J., Anderson C.W.N., Sapkota A., Fu X., Larssen T. Atmospheric mercury inputs in montane soils increase with elevation: evidence from mercury isotope signatures // Scientific Reports. 2013. Vol. 3 (3322). PP. 1-8. doi: 10.1038/ srep03322
34. Shao J.J., Liu C.B., Zhang Q.H., Fu J.J., Yang R.Q., Shi J.B., Cai Y, Jiang G.B. Characterization and speciation of mercury in mosses and lichens from the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau // Environmental geochemistry and health. 2017. Vol. 39, № 3. PP. 475482. doi: 10.1007/s10653-016-9828-y
35. Mezhibor A.M., Bolshunova T.S., Rikhvanov L.P. Geochemical features of sphagnum mosses and epiphytic lichens in oil and gas exploitation areas (the case of Western Siberia, Russia) // Environmental Earth Sciences. 2016. Vol. 75, № 18. e1260. doi: 10.1007/s12665- 016-6062-y
36. Тарханов С.Н. Влияние аэротехногенного загрязнения на покрытие стволов деревьев эпифитными лишайниками в лесных насаждениях Северо-Двинского бассейна и Беломорско-Кулойского плато // Известия высших учебных заведений. Лесной журнал. 2016. Т 1, № 349. C. 37-47. doi: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2016.1.37
37. Bozkurt Z. Determination of airborne trace elements in an urban area using lichens as biomonitor // Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2017. Vol. 189. № 11. PP. 573. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6275-x
38. Klapstein S.J., Walker A.K., Saunders C.H., Cameron R.P., Murimboh J.D., O'Driscoll N.J. Spatial distribution of mercury and other potentially toxic elements using epiphytic lichens in Nova Scotia // Chemosphere. 2020. Vol. 241. e125064. doi: 10.1016/j. chemosphere.2019.125064
39. Weiss-Penzias P.S., Bank M.S., Clifford D.L., Torregrosa A., Zheng B., Lin W., Wilmers C.C.. Marine fog inputs appear to increase methylmercury bioaccumulation in a coastal terrestrial food web // Scientific Reports. 2019. Vol. 9. e17611. doi: 10.1038/ s41598-019-54056-7
40. Ndlovu N.B., Frontasyeva M.V., Newman R.T., Maleka P.P. Active biomonitoring of atmospheric pollution in the Western Cape (South Africa) using INAA and ICP-MS // Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear. 2019. Vol. 322. PP. 1549-1559. doi: 10.1007/ s10967-019-06823-z
References
1. World Health Organization/ United Nations Environment Programme (WHO/ UNEP). Guidance for identifying populations at risk from mercury exposure. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: Inter-Organization Program for the Sound Management of Chemicals; 2008. 167 p. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.who.int/ foodsafety/publications/chem/mercuryexposure.pdf (accessed 31.03.2020).
2. Li WC, Tse HF. Health risk and significance of mercury in the environment. Environ Sci PollutRes. 2015;22(1):192-201. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3544-x
3. Travnikov O, Dastoor A, Friedman C, Ryzhkov A, Selin N, Song S. Global mercury modelling: update of modelling results in the global mercury assessment 2013. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, Norway/ UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland: Narayana Press; 2013. 36 p. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https:// wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/13772/Report_Modelling_update_of_ the_GMA2013.pdf.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 31.03.2020).
4. Pirrone N, Keating T. Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution 2010: Part B-Mercury. New
York and Geneva: United Nations Publication; 2010. 213 p. [Electronic resource]. Available at:https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/lrtap/Publications/11-22145-Part-B.pdf
(accessed 31.03.2020).
5. Obrist D, Kirk JL, Zhang L, Sunderland EM, Jiskra M, Selin NE. A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use. Ambio. 2018;47(2):116-140. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017- 1004-9
6. Bargagli R. Moss and lichen biomonitoring of atmospheric mercury: A review. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;572:216-231. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.202
7. Kuldeep S, Bhattacharya P. Lichen as a Bioindicator Tool for Assessment of Climate and Air Pollution Vulnerability: Review. Int Research J Environmental Sciences. 2015;4:107-117.
8. Anicic MU, Gordana V, Milica T. Biomonitoring of Air Pollution Using Mosses and Lichens: A Passive & Active Approach - State of the Art Research & Perspectives. Air, Water and Soil Pollution Science and Technology Series. New York, United States: Nova Science Publishers Inc.; 2016. 236 p.
9. Robertas YV, Puzanov AV. Characteristics of the manifestation of transboundary pollutants transfer on the territory of Altai. Geography and Natural Resources. 2017;38(4):349-356. doi: 10.1134/S1875372817040060
10. Osipova NA, Filimonenko KA, Talovskaya AV, Yazikov EG. Geochemical Approach to Human Health Risk Assessment of Inhaled Trace Elements in the Vicinity of Industrial Enterprises in Tomsk, Russia. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. 2015;21(6):1664-1685. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2014.972912
11. Makarova A, Kruchina E, Fedoseev A, Borisov D, Suchkova D. Estimating Mercury Footprint In The Regions Of The Russian Federation. In: International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM: Surveying Geology & mining Ecology Management. Proc. of the 18th Conference. Sofia, Bulgaria. 2018:387-394. doi: 10.5593/sgem2018/5.2/ S20.052
12. Komov VT, Ivanova ES, Poddubnaya NY, Gremyachikh VA. Mercury in soil, earthworms and organs of voles Myodes glareolus and shrew Sorex araneus in the vicinity of an industrial complex in Northwest Russia (Cherepovets). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2017;189(3):104. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5799-4
13. Tatsii YG, Udachin VN, Amino PG. Environmental geochemistry of mercury in the area of emissions of the Karabashmed copper smelter. Geochemistry International. 2017;55(10):935-945. doi: 10.1134/S0016702917100093
14. Mirzoyeva N, Gulina L, Gulin S, Plotitsina O, Stetsuk A, Arkhipova S, Korkishko N, Eremin O. Radionuclides and mercury in the salt lakes of the Crimea. Chinese J Oceanology and Limnology. 2015;33(6):1413-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00343-015-4374-5
15. Radchenko AI. Raspredeleniye rtuti v landshaftno-geokhimicheskikh zonakh Kryma [Mercury distribution in landscape-geochemical areas of Crimea]. Mineralogicheskiy Zhurnal. 1999;21(1):79-84. In Russian
16. Ryabinin AI, Bobrova SA, Mal'chenko YA, Saltykova LV Neytronno-aktivatsionnyy mnogoelementnyy monitoring istochnikov pit'yevykh vod v regione g. Sevastopolya (19922010 gg.) [Neutron-activation multi-element monitoring of drinking water sources in the region of the city of Sevastopol (1992-2010)]. In: Monitoring sostoyaniya i zagryazneniya okruzhayushchey sredy. Osnovnyye rezul'taty i puti razvitiya. Materialy nauch. konf. [Monitoring of the state and environmental pollution. Main results and ways of development. Proc. of the Sci. Conf. (Moscow, Russia, 20-22 March, 2017)]. Moscow; 2017. pp. 498499. Available at: https://www.sgu.ru/sites/default/files/textdocsfiles/2017/04/04/theses_ pem2017.pdf (accessed 31.03.2020). In Russian
17. Evstafeva EV, Bogdanova AM, Bolshunova TS, Baranovskaya NV, Osipova NA. Mercury content in the epiphytic lichens of Crimea Republic. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2019;330(7):93-103. doi: 10.18799/24131830/2019/7/2180 In Russian, English Summary
18. PortalPravitel'stvaRespubliki Krym [Portal of the Government of the Republic of Crimea] [Electronic resource]. Available at: meco.rk.gov.ru/ru/structure/60 (accessed 31.03.2020). In Russian
19. Baraboshkin EY, Baraboshkina TA, Kayukova EP, Krylov OV, Yaseneva EV, Yasenev AV. Ekologo-resursnyy potentsial Kryma. Istoriya formirovaniya i perspektivy razvitiya. T. 1 [Ecological and resource potential of the Crimea. History of formation and development prospects. Vol. 1]. St. Petersburg: ВВМ Publ.; 2016. 435 p. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.rfbr.ru/rffi/ru/books/o_2060326#1 (accessed 31.03.2020). In Russian
20. Dragan NA. Comparative estimation of quality of soil resources of Crimea. Uchenyye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Geografiya. Geologiya = Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Geography. Geology. 2011;24(2-1):260-266. In Russian
21. Analiz tendentsiy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Respubliki Krym: Monografiya [Analysis of trends in the socio-economic development of the Republic of Crimea: Monograph]. Maydanevich YP, editor. Simferopol: POLIPRINT Publ.; 2019. 362 p. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://ieu.cfuv.ru/sites/default/files/2019-03/%D0 %A1%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA2019.pdf (accessed 31.03.2020). In Russian
22. Geologiya rtutnykh mestorozhdeniy i rudoproyavleniy Ukrainy [Geology of mercury deposits and occurrences of Ukraine]. Skarzhinskiy VI, editor. Kiev: Naukova dumka Publ.; 1975. 285 p. In Russian
23. Aksenov EM, Belyayev EV, Sadykov RK. Industry potencial of solid industry minerals of Crimean Federal District. Prospect and Protection of Mineral Resources. 2015;9:38-46. In Russian
24. Mycobank [Electronic resource]. Available at: www.mycobank.org (accessed 31.03.2020).
25. Bargagli R, Nimis PL. Guidelines for the Use of Epiphytic Lichens as Biomonitors of Atmospheric Deposition of Trace Elements. Monitoring with Lichens - Monitoring Lichens. NATO Science Series (Series IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences). 2002;7:295-299. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0423-7_23
26. Panichev N, Mokgalaka N, Panicheva S. Assessment of air pollution by mercury in South African provinces using lichens Parmelia caperata as bioindicators. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2019;41:2239-2250. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00283-w
27. Esbri JM, Lopez-Berdonces MA, Fernandez-Calderon S, Higueras P, Diez S. Atmospheric mercury pollution around a chlor-alkali plant in Flix (NE Spain): An integrated analysis. Environ Sci PollutRes. 2015;22:4842-4850. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3305-x
28. The Jamovi Project (2020). Jamovi. (Version 1.2). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://wwwjamovi.org (accessed 31.03.2020).
29. Dobrovolskiy VV Osnovy biogeokhimii: uchebnik dlya stud. VUZov [Fundamentals of biogeochemistry: A textbook for students of universities]. Moscow: Academiya Publ.; 2003. 400 p. In Russian
30. Lyapina EE. Geoecological features of the mercury load on the territory of the Tomsk region according to the data of biomonitoring research. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015;1(2). In Russian, English Summary
31. Plotitsyna OV, Stetsyuk AP, Popovichev VN. Raspredelenie rtuti v vode solenykh ozer severo-zapadnoy chasti Kryma, Chernogo morya i sevastopol'skikh bukht [Mercury distribution in waters of the North-Western Crimea Salt Lakes, Black Sea and Sevastopol Bays]. Ecological Safety of Coastal and Shelf Zones of Sea. 2014;28:225-230. In Russian
32. Shnyukov YF, Netrebskaya EY. Deep geological structure of mud volcanoes in the Black Sea. Geologiya i poleznyye iskopayemyye Mirovogo okeana = Geology and Minerals of the World Ocean. 2014;2(36):66-79. In Russian
33. Zhang H, Yin RS, Feng XB, Sommar J, Anderson CWN, Sapkota A, Fu X, Larssen T. Atmospheric mercury inputs in montane soils increase with elevation: Evidence from mercury isotope signatures. Scientific Reports. 2013;3(3322):1-8. doi: 10.1038/srep03322
34. Shao JJ, Liu CB, Zhang QH, Fu JJ, Yang RQ, Shi JB, Cai Y, Jiang GB. Characterization and speciation of mercury in mosses and lichens from the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2017;39(3):475-482. doi: 10.1007/s10653-016-9828-y
35. Mezhibor AM, Bolshunova TS, Rikhvanov LP. Geochemical features of sphagnum mosses and epiphytic lichens in oil and gas exploitation areas (the case of Western Siberia, Russia). Environmental Earth Sciences. 2016;75(18):1260. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-6062-y
36. Tarkhanov SN. Influence of aerotechnogenic pollution on the tree trunks coverage by epiphytic lichens in the forest plantations of the Northern Dvina basin and the White SeaKuloi plateau. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal. 2016;1(349):37-47. doi: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2016.1.37 In Russian, English Summary
37. Bozkurt Z. Determination of airborne trace elements in an urban area using lichens as biomonitor. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2017;189(11):573. doi: 10.1007/ s10661-017-6275-x
38. Klapstein SJ, Walker AK, Saunders CH, Cameron RP, Murimboh JD, O'Driscoll NJ. Spatial distribution of mercury and other potentially toxic elements using epiphytic lichens in Nova Scotia. Chemosphere. 2020;241:e125064. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125064
39. Weiss-Penzias PS, Bank MS, Clifford DL, Torregrosa A, Zheng B, Lin W, Wilmers CC. Marine fog inputs appear to increase methylmercury bioaccumulation in a coastal terrestrial food web. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:e17611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54056-7
40. Ndlovu NB, Frontasyeva MV, Newman RT, Maleka PP. Active biomonitoring of atmospheric pollution in the Western Cape (South Africa) using INAA and ICP-MS. J Radioanalytical and Nuclear. 2019;322:1549-1559. doi: 10.1007/s10967-019-06823-z