Материал: Клинический протокол. ВРТ и искусственная инсеминация

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17714711

154. Johnson LNC, Sasson IE, Sammel MD, Dokras A. Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2013;100(3):704–11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773312

155.Moreno C, Ruiz A, Simón C, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a routine indication in low responder patients. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1998;13(8):2126–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9756282

156.Luna M, Bigelow C, Duke M, Ruman J, Sandler B, Grunfeld L, et al. Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved? J Assist Reprod

157.Kim HH, Bundorf MK, Behr B, McCallum SW. Use and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2007;88(3):622–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17445809

158.Hwang JL, Lin YH, Tsai YL. In vitro maturation and fertilization of immature oocytes: a comparative study of fertilization techniques. J Assist Reprod Genet [Internet]. 2000;17(1):39–43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10754782

159.Nagy ZP, Cecile J, Liu J, Loccufier A, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Pregnancy and birth after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of in vitro matured germinal-vesicle stage oocytes: case report. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 1996;65(5):1047–50. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8612833

160.Tucker M, Graham J, Han T, Stillman R, Levy M. Conventional insemination versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 2001;358(9293):1645–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11716920

161.Teixeira DM, Barbosa MAP, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA, Raine-Fenning N, Nastri CO, et al. Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD010167.

162.McDowell S, Kroon B, Ford E, Hook Y, Glujovsky D, Yazdani A. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2014;(10):CD010461.

163.Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod

164.Zeng M, Su S, Li L. The effect of laser-assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci [Internet]. 2018;33(3):655–66. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29116610

165.Carney S-K, Das S, Blake D, Farquhar C, Seif MMW, Nelson L. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD001894.

166.Capalbo A, Romanelli V, Cimadomo D, Girardi L, Stoppa M, Dovere L, et al. Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management. J Assist Reprod Genet [Internet]. 2016;33(10):1279–86. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423665

155

167.Martins WP, Rocha IA, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO. Assisted hatching of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod Update [Internet]. 17(4):438–53. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21474527

168.Li D, Yang D-L, An J, Jiao J, Zhou Y-M, Wu Q-J, et al. Effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

169.Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A, Staessen C, Michiels A, Verpoest W, et al. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2008;23(3):481–

92.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18156649

170.De Vos A, Staessen C, De Rycke M, Verpoest W, Haentjens P, Devroey P, et al. Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2009;24(12):2988–96. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19773223

171.Dumoulin JC, Bras M, Coonen E, Dreesen J, Geraedts JP, Evers JL. Effect of Ca2+/Mg2+- free medium on the biopsy procedure for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and further development of human embryos. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1998;13(1O):2880–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9804249

172.Kahraman S, Bahçe M, Samli H, Imirzalioğlu N, Yakisn K, Cengiz G, et al. Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2000;15(9):2003–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10967004

173.Munné S, Cohen J. Unsuitability of multinucleated human blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1993;8(7):1120–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8408497

174.Geber S, Bossi R, Lisboa CB, Valle M, Sampaio M. Laser confers less embryo exposure than acid tyrode for embryo biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles: a randomized study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol [Internet]. 2011;9:58. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21527004

175.Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obs Gynecol. 1999;13(3):307–11.

176.Wininger JD, Taylor TH, Orris JJ, Glassner M, Anderson SH. Pregnancy after rebiopsy and vitrification of blastocysts following allele dropout after day 3 biopsy. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2011;95(3):1122.e1--2. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20951376

177.Greco E, Biricik A, Cotarelo RP, Iammarone E, Rubino P, Tesarik J, et al. Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst. Springerplus [Internet]. 2015;4:22. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25625041

178.Eldar-Geva T, Srebnik N, Altarescu G, Varshaver I, Brooks B, Levy-Lahad E, et al. Neonatal outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2014;102(4):1016–

21.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25064409

179.De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn [Internet]. 2001;21(9):767–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11559914

180.Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis

156

comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):139–55.

181.Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2239–46.

182.Cobo A, Garrido N, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Six years’ experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2015;104(6):1426–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26353081

183.Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(1):35–58.

184.Shi Q, Xie Y, Wang Y, Li S. Vitrification versus slow freezing for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a systematic review and meta-anlaysis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2017;7(1):8538. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819292

185.Zhou X-H, Zhang D, Shi J, Wu Y-J. Comparison of vitrification and conventional slow freezing for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue with respect to the number of intact primordial follicles: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. 2016;95(39):e4095. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27684791

186.Justice T, Christensen G. Sperm cryopreservation methods. Methods Mol Biol [Internet]. 2013;927:209–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22992915

187.Levron J, Madgar I, Shefi S, Meirow D, Wiser A, Bider D, et al. IVF outcome with cryopreserved testicular sperm. Andrologia [Internet]. 2011;43(1):48–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219382

188.Hovatta O, Foudila T, Siegberg R, Johansson K, von Smitten K, Reima I. Pregnancy resulting from intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa from a frozen-thawed testicular biopsy specimen. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1996;11(11):2472–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8981136

189.Vajta G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. Open versus closed systems for vitrification of human oocytes and embryos. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet]. 2015;30(4):325–33. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25639657

190.Youm HS, Choi J-R, Oh D, Rho YH. Survival Rates in Closed and Open Vitrification for Human Mature Oocyte Cryopreservation: A Meta-Analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest

191.Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):393– 406.

192.Гинтер ЕК, Пузырев ВП. Наследственные болезни. Национальное руководство. Краткое издание. ГЭОТАР-Мед. Москва; 2017. 464 p.

193.Daughtry BL, Chavez SL. Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences. Cell Tissue Res

194.Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2245–

157

54.

195.De Rycke M, Goossens V, Kokkali G, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Coonen E, Moutou C. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIV-XV: cycles from January 2011 to December 2012 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2013. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2017;32(10):1974–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117384

196.PGDIS position statement on chromosome mosaicism and preimplantation aneuploidy testing at the blastocyst stage. Chicago: PGDIS Newsletter, July 19, 2016.

197.Liss J, Chromik I, Szczyglińska J, Jagiełło M, Łukaszuk A, Łukaszuk K. Current methods for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Ginekol Pol [Internet]. 2016;87(7):522–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27504946

198.Kane SC, Willats E, Bezerra Maia E Holanda Moura S, Hyett J, da Silva Costa F. PreImplantation Genetic Screening Techniques: Implications for Clinical Prenatal Diagnosis. Fetal Diagn Ther [Internet]. 2016;40(4):241–54. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27682145

199.Chen H-F, Chen S-U, Ma G-C, Hsieh S-T, Tsai H-D, Yang Y-S, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening: Current status and future challenges. J Formos Med Assoc

200.Lu L, Lv B, Huang K, Xue Z, Zhu X, Fan G. Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Assist Reprod Genet [Internet]. 2016;33(9):1129–34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27272212

201.Brezina PR, Anchan R, Kearns WG. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: what technology should you use and what are the differences? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Jul;33(7):823–32.

202.Рыжкова О, Кардымон О, Прохорчук Е. Руководство по интерпретации данных, полученных методами массового параллельного секвенирования (MPS). Медицинская генетика. 2017;16(7):4–17.

203.Deglincerti A, Croft GF, Pietila LN, Zernicka-Goetz M, Siggia ED, Brivanlou AH. Selforganization of the in vitro attached human embryo. Nature [Internet]. 2016;533(7602):251– 4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27144363

204.Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2013;99(1):47–62. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23095142

205.Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Oocyte or embryo donation to women of advanced age: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2013;100(2):337–40. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23472948

206.Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: ASRM@asrm.org, Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Oocyte or embryo donation to women of advanced reproductive age: an Ethics Committee

opinion. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2016;106(5):e3--e7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450186

207.Le Ray C, Scherier S, Anselem O, Marszalek A, Tsatsaris V, Cabrol D, et al. Association between oocyte donation and maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 43 years or older. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2012;27(3):896–901. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22252087

208.Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice

158

Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Electronic address: ASRM@asrm.org, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2017;107(2):e3--e10. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28069181

209.Сельков СА, Ярмолинская МИ. Эндометриоз как патология регуляторных механизмов. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2017;66(2):9–13.

210.Schifrin BS, Erez S, Moore JG. Teen-age endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1973;116(7):973–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4718224

211.Wheeler JM. Epidemiology of endometriosis-associated infertility. J Reprod Med [Internet]. 1989;34(1):41–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2704007

212.Giudice LC, Kao LC. Endometriosis. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 364(9447):1789– 99. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15541453

213.Fuentes A, Escalona J, Céspedes P, Espinoza A, Johnson MC. [Prevalence of endometriosis in 287 women undergoing surgical sterilization in Santiago Chile]. Rev Med Chil [Internet]. 2014;142(1):16–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24861109

214.Macer ML, Taylor HS. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2012;39(4):535–49. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23182559

215.Bondza PK, Maheux R, Akoum A. Insights into endometriosis-associated endometrial dysfunctions: a review. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) [Internet]. 2009;1:415–28. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19482656

216.Saito H, Seino T, Kaneko T, Nakahara K, Toya M, Kurachi H. Endometriosis and oocyte quality. Gynecol Obstet Invest [Internet]. 2002;53 Suppl 1:46–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11834868

217.Mansour G, Aziz N, Sharma R, Falcone T, Goldberg J, Agarwal A. The impact of peritoneal fluid from healthy women and from women with endometriosis on sperm DNA and its relationship to the sperm deformity index. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2009;92(1):61–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19409553

218.Mansour G, Sharma RK, Agarwal A, Falcone T. Endometriosis-induced alterations in mouse metaphase II oocyte microtubules and chromosomal alignment: a possible cause of infertility.

219.Garrido N, Navarro J, García-Velasco J, Remoh J, Pellice A, Simón C. The endometrium versus embryonic quality in endometriosis-related infertility. Hum Reprod Update [Internet]. 8(1):95–103. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11866246

220.Kissler S, Zangos S, Wiegratz I, Kohl J, Rody A, Gaetje R, et al. Utero-tubal sperm transport and its impairment in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci [Internet]. 2007;1101:38–48. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17344532

221.Barnhart K, Dunsmoor-Su R, Coutifaris C. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization.

159