7. Case R. The unfortuate consequences of Bloom's taxonomy // Social Education. 2013. Vol. 77, № 4. P. 196-200.
8. Doran G. T. There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives : [англ.] // Management Review. 1981. Vol. 70, № 11. P. 35-36.
9. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. New York : David McKay Company, 1956. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. 207 р.
10. AndersonL.W., Krathwohl D.R. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, complete edition, eds. New York : Longman, 2001. 287 p.
11. Hardarson A. Aims of Education: How to Resist the Temptation of Technocratic Models // Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2017. Vol. 51, № 1. P. 59-72.
12. Suskie L. Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide, 2nd Edition. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco : Wiley, 2018. 384 p.
13. Ардашкин И.Б., Суровцев В.А. К вопросу об эпистемологии смарт-технологий и их визуализации: ведет ли смарт-образование к смарт-эпистемологии? // nPAEHMA. Проблемы визуальной семиотики. 2019. Вып. 4 (22). С. 9-35.
14. ЛисанюкЕ.Н. Логико-когнитивная теория аргументации : дис. ... д-ра филос. наук. М., 2016. 297 с.
15. Боровинская Д.Н. Измерение социального запроса на креативное образование // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2020. № 58. С. 264-271.
16. Martindale C. Personality, situation and creativity // Handbook of Creativity / eds. J. Glover, R. Ronning, G. Reynolds. New York : Plenum, 1989. P. 211-232.
17. Аргументация в праве и морали / под ред. Е.Н. Лисанюк. СПб. : ИД «Алеф-Пресс», 2018. 521 с.
18. Hempel C.G. Rational Action // Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. 1965. Vol. 35. P. 5-23.
19. Lau Joe Y.F. An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity: think more, think better. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 2011. 262 p.
20. Карпов Г.В., Лисанюк Е.Н. Практическая философия обучения аргументации и критическому мышлению // Профессиональное образование в современном мире. 2020. Т. 10, № 3. С. 3959-3970.
21. Швецов А.Н. Агентно-ориентированные системы: от формальных моделей к промышленным приложениям // Информационно-телекоммуникационные системы : сб. ст. Всерос. конкурс. отбора обзорно-аналит. ст.. М. : ФГУ ГНИИ ИТТ «Информика», 2008. С. 1-101.
22. WooldridgeM. An Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems. John Wiley and Sons. 2002. 376 p.
23. Люгер Д.Ф. Искусственный интеллект: стратегии и методы решения сложных проблем : пер. с англ. М. : Изд. дом «Вильямс», 2003. 864 с.
24. BrooksR.A. Intelligence without representation // Artificial Intelligence. 1991. № 47. P. 139159.
25. Hayes-Roth B. An integrated architecture for intelligence agents // SIGART. 1991. Vol. 2, № 4. P. 79-81.
26. Nwana H.S. Software Agents: An Overview // Knowledge Engineering Review. 1996. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 1-40.
27. Боровинская Д.Н., Суровцев В.А. Креативность и мышление: категориальная характеристика // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2019. № 47. С. 15-24.
28. Витгенштейн Л. Лекция об этике // Историко-философский ежегодник. М. : Наука, 1989. С. 238-246.
29. Суровцев В.А. Автономия логики: источники, генезис и система философии раннего Витгенштейна. Томск : Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2011. 308 с.
30. Суровцев В.А. Аналитическая философия: всеобщее и нюанс // Вопросы философии. 2010. № 8. С. 23-29.
31. Reichenbach H. Elements of symbolic logic. New York, 1944. 444 p.
32. Wright C.H. The logical Problem of induction. Oxford : Basil Black well. Second edition, 1957. 249 p.
33. Боровинская Д.Н., Суровцев В.А. Рефлексия и природа креативности // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2019. № 49. С. 17-25.
References
1. Bell, D. (1999) Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognoziro- vaniya [The coming post-industrial society. Experience of social forecasting]. Translated from English. Moscow: Akademiya.
2. Glaeser, E.L., Kolko, J. & Saiz, A. (2001) Consumer City. Journal of Economic Geography. 1. pp. 27-50.
3. Florida, R. (2005) Kreativnyy klass: lyudi, kotorye menyayut budushchee [Creative Class: People Who Change the Future].Translated from English. Moscow: Klassika-XXI.
4. Hezmondalsh, D. (2014) Kul'tumye industrii [Cultural Industries]. Translated from English by I. Kushnareva. Moscow: HSE.
5. Russia. (2020) O kreativnykh industriyakh v Khanty-Mansiyskom avtonomnom okruge - Yugre: zakon KhMAO - Yugry ot 27.07.2020 N 70-oz [On the creative industries in the Khanty- Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Ugra: Law N 70-oz of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra dated July 27, 2020]. [Online] Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/regbase/cgi/on- line.cgi?req=doc;base=RLAW926;n=215274#08279441615743315 (Accessed: 10th May 2022).
6. Vizho, I.Yu., Petrova, G.I. & Tarabanov, N.A. (2008) Obrazovatel'naya sub"ektivnost' klas- sicheskogo universiteta v poiskakh istiny [Educational subjectivity of the classical university in search of truth]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta - Tomsk State University Journal. 312. pp. 37-41.
7. Case, R. (2013) The unfortuate consequences of Bloom's taxonomy. Social Education. 77(4). pp. 196-200.
8. Doran, G.T. (1981) There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. Management Review. 70(11). pp. 35-36.
9. Bloom, B.S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. New York: David McKay Company.
10. Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
11. Hardarson, A. (2017) Aims of Education: How to Resist the Temptation of Technocratic Models. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 51(1). pp. 59-72. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9752.12182
12. Suskie, L. (2018) Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco: Wiley.
13. Ardashkin, I.B. & Surovtsev, V.A. (2019) Revisiting the issue of smart technologies epistemology and visualization: does smart education lead to smart epistemology? nPAaHMA. Problemy vizual'noy semiotiki - nPAaHMA. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 4(22). pp. 9-35. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-9-35
14. Lisanyuk, E.N. (2016) Logiko-kognitivnaya teoriya argumentatsii [Logico-Cognitive Theory of Argumentation]. Philosophy Dr. Diss. Moscow.
15. Borovinskaya, D.N. (2020) Measuring Social Demand for Creative Education. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 58. pp. 264-271. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/58/24
16. Martindale, C. (1989) Personality, situation and creativity. In: Glover, J., Ronning, R. & Reynolds, G. (eds) Handbook of Creativity. New York: Plenum. pp. 211-232.
17. Lisanyuk, E.N. (ed.) (2018) Argumentatsiya v prave i morali [Argumentation in Law and Morality]. St. Petersburg: Alef-Press.
18. Hempel, C.G. (1965) Rational Action. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. 35. pp. 5-23.
19. Lau Joe, Y.F. (2011) An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity: think more, think better. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
20. Karpov, G.V. & Lisanyuk, E.N. (2020) Prakticheskaya filosofiya obucheniya argumentatsii i kriticheskomu myshleniyu [Practical Philosophy of Teaching Argumentation and Critical Thinking]. Professional'noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire. 10(3). pp. 3959-3970.
21. Shvetsov, A.N. (2008) Agentno-orientirovannye sistemy: ot formal'nykh modeley k promyshlennym prilozheniyam [Agent-oriented systems: from formal models to industrial applications]. In: Informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnye sistemy [Information and Telecommunication Systems]. Moscow: State Research Institute of Information Technologies and Telecommunications.
pp. 1-101.
22. Wooldridge, M. (2002) An Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems. John Wiley and Sons.
23. Luger, D.F. (2003) Iskusstvenniy intellekt: strategii i metody resheniya slozhnykh problem [Artificial intelligence: strategies and methods for solving complex problems]. Translated from English. Moscow: Vil'yams.
24. Brooks, R.A. (1991) Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence. 47. pp. 139159.
25. Hayes-Roth, B. (1991) An integrated architecture for intelligence agents. SIGART. 2(4). pp. 79-81.
26. Nwana, H.S. (1996) Software Agents: An Overview. Knowledge Engineering Review. 11(3). pp. 1-40.
27. Borovinskaya, D.N. & Surovtsev, V.A. (2019) Creativity and thinking: Categorical characteristics. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 47. pp. 15-24. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/47/2
28. Wittgenstein, L. (1989) Lektsiya ob etike [Lecture on ethics]. In: Istoriko-filosofskiy ezhegodnik [Historical and Philosophical Yearbook]. Moscow: Nauka. pp. 238-246.
29. Surovtsev, V.A. (2011) Avtonomiya logiki: istochniki, genezis i sistema filosofii rannego Vitgenshteyna [The Autonomy of Logic: The Sources, Genesis, and System of Early Wittgenstein's Philosophy]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University.
30. Surovtsev, V.A. (2010) Analiticheskaya filosofiya: vseobshchee i nyuans [Analytical Philosophy: General and Nuance]. Voprosyfilosofii. 8. pp. 23-29.
31. Reichenbach, H. (1944) Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Dover Pubns.
32. Wright, C.H. (1957) The Logical Problem of Induction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
33. Borovinskaya, D.N. & Surovtsev, V.A. (2019) Reflection and the Nature of Creativity. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 49. pp. 17-25. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/49/2