Ссылки
1. Sunstein C., Miles T. The New Legal Realism // University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 191, 2007, pp. 1-23.
2. Ibid.
3. Erlanger H., et al., Is It Time for a New Legal Realism? // Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2005, No. 2, pp. 335-363.
4. Macaulay S. The New Versus the Old Legal Realism: "Things Ain't What They Used to Be" // Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2005, No. 2, pp. 365-403.
5. Heise M. The Past, Present, and Future of Empirical Legal Scholarship: Judicial Decision Making and the New Empiricism // Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 733. 2002, pp. 819-850.
6. Macaulay S. A New Legal Realism: Elegant Models and the Messy Law in Action // The New Legal Realism. Translating Law-and-Society for Today's Legal Practice. Volume 1 / Edited by Elizabeth Mertz, Stewart Macaulay, Thomas W. Mitchell. New York, 2016, pp. 29-50.
7. Ibid.
8. Ibid.
9. Llewellyn K.N. Some Realism About Realism: Responding to Dean Pound // Harvard Law Review. Vol. 44, No. 8 (Jun., 1931), pp. 1222-1264.
10. Sunstein C., Miles T. Op. cit.
11. Llewellyn K.N. Op. cit.
12. Sunstein C., Miles T. Op. cit.
13. Holmes O.W. The Law [Электронный ресурс] // Suffolk Bar Association Dinner, February 5, 1885. URL: http://li-brary.law.harvard.edu/suites/owh/index.php/item/43198537/1 (дата обращения: 15.01.2020).
14. Llewellyn K.N. Op. cit.
15. The New Legal Realism. Translating Law-and-Society for Today's Legal Practice. Vol. 1 / Edited by E. Mertz, S. Macaulay, T.W. Mitchell. New York, 2016. 303 р.
16. The New Legal Realism. Studying Law Globally: New Legal Realist Perspectives, Vol. II / Edited by H. Klug and S.E. Merry. New York, 2016. 282 р.
17. References:
18. Erlanger, H et al. 2005, `Is It Time for a New Legal Realism?', Wisconsin Law Review, vol. 2005, no. 2, pp. 335-363.
19. Heise, M 2002, `The Past, Present, and Future of Empirical Legal Scholarship: Judicial Decision Making and the New Empiricism', Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 733, pp. 819-850.
20. Holmes, OW 2020, `The Law', Suffolk Bar Association Dinner, February 5, 1885, viewed 15 January 2020, <http://li-
21. brary.law.harvard.edu/suites/owh/index.php/item/43198537/1 >.
22. Klug, H & Merry, SE (eds) 2016, The New Legal Realism: Studying Law Globally, New York, vol. 2, 282 р.,
23. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139683432.
24. Llewellyn, KN 1931, `Some Realism About Realism: Responding to Dean Pound', Harvard Law Review, vol. 44, no. 8, Jun., pp. 1222-1264, https://doi.org/10.2307/1332182.
25. Macaulay, S 2005, `The New Versus the Old Legal Realism: "Things Ain't What They Used to Be"', Wisconsin Law Review, vol. 2005, no. 2, pp. 365-403.
26. Macaulay, S 2016, `A New Legal Realism: Elegant Models and the Messy Law in Action', in E Mertz, S Macaulay & TW Mitchell (eds), The New Legal Realism: Translating Law-and-Society for Today's Legal Practice, New York, vol. 1, pp. 29-50, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107762336.003.
27. Mertz, E, Macaulay, S & Mitchell, TW (eds) 2016, The New Legal Realism: Translating Law-and-Society for Today's Legal Practice, New York, vol. 1,303 p., https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107762336.
28. Sunstein, C & Miles, T 2007, `The New Legal Realism', University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 191, pp. 1-23.